GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

CMP 30HX

CORE STATE TU116
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1785 MHz
TDP 125 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
24,546
65,199
geekbench_vulkan
24,747
62,484

Analysis: Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

Analyzing the test numbers for NVIDIA NVIDIA CMP 30HX GPU and Intel's Arc A350M graphics, a definite trend unfolds. NVIDIA NVIDIA CMP 30HX GPU steadily provides higher frame rates in the testing. This benchmark advantage ranges from considerable to impressive according to the given title. This steadiness points to fundamental engineering advantages. Consumers wanting rendering performance might factor this in.

This VRAM advantage of NVIDIA NVIDIA CMP 30HX GPU becomes increasingly critical at elevated resolutions. Ultra HD rendering needs significant video memory, and NVIDIA NVIDIA CMP 30HX GPU delivers greater capability. This results into enhanced experiences in memory-intensive games. Modern software can increasingly need greater memory. This advantage grows over releases.

This graphics memory advantage of NVIDIA NVIDIA CMP 30HX GPU becomes more relevant at demanding settings. Ultra HD scenarios consumes significant VRAM, and NVIDIA NVIDIA CMP 30HX GPU offers greater headroom. This results into improved gameplay in memory-intensive scenarios. Next-gen software can increasingly require extra memory. This superiority increases over the years.

Ultimately: NVIDIA NVIDIA CMP 30HX GPU takes this showdown convincingly. Consumers prioritizing gaming power would definitely consider NVIDIA NVIDIA CMP 30HX GPU over Intel's Arc A350M graphics. This benchmark evidence demonstrates this conclusion. Your titles can execute substantially better. This is a clear victor in this category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A350M
CMP 30HX
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
1,408 +83.3%
Shaders
768
1,408 +83.3%
TMUs
48
88 +83.3%
ROPs
24
48 +100.0%
SM Count
22
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
1150 MHz
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1785 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
6 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
6,144 +50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
336.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
1536 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
85.68 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
157.1 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
10.05 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
25 W
125 W
TDP (W)
25
125 +400.0%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Turing
GPU Name
DG2-128
TU116
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Mining GPUs
Process Size
6 nm
12 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
6,600 million
Die Size
157 mm²
284 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
45.9M / mm²
23.2M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
229 mm 9 inches
Height
111 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 1.0 x4
Other
Launch Price
799 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
View Arc A350M Details View CMP 30HX Details