GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

CORE STATE Navi 21
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2250 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

CMP 30HX

CORE STATE TU116
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1785 MHz
TDP 125 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
4,079
N/A
geekbench_metal
177,021
N/A
geekbench_opencl
187,673
65,199
geekbench_vulkan
148,525
62,484
passmark_directx_10
167
N/A
passmark_directx_11
279
N/A
passmark_directx_12
113
N/A
passmark_directx_9
268
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,055
N/A
passmark_g3d
26,732
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
14,547
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

Analyzing the test results for the RX 6900 XT card from AMD and NVIDIA CMP 30HX (NVIDIA), a definite trend develops. the RX 6900 XT card from AMD consistently produces better frame rates in our evaluation. This speed lead varies from significant to outstanding based on the given title. Such consistency points to underlying architectural benefits. Users prioritizing visual power would consider this.

NVIDIA CMP 30HX (NVIDIA) struggles to rival the RX 6900 XT card from AMD's raw power. In cost-sensitive buyers, NVIDIA CMP 30HX (NVIDIA) could nevertheless represent acceptable frame rates, but people needing maximum experience should invest toward the RX 6900 XT card from AMD. The frame rate delta is significantly notable to overlook. Resource-hungry titles specifically reveal this disparity. The cost difference delivers dividends in frame rates.

The VRAM benefit of the RX 6900 XT card from AMD gets increasingly significant at elevated quality levels. High resolution rendering needs substantial graphics memory, and the RX 6900 XT card from AMD offers more capability. This leads into smoother experiences in heavy scenarios. Upcoming games will increasingly require more VRAM. This edge increases over releases.

When all is said and done: the RX 6900 XT card from AMD takes this comparison convincingly. Consumers prioritizing rendering capability should seriously choose the RX 6900 XT card from AMD over NVIDIA CMP 30HX (NVIDIA). This score evidence demonstrates this assessment. The titles might render considerably smoother. This is a straightforward champion in this category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 6900 XT
CMP 30HX
Core Specs
Shading Units
5,120
1,408 -72.5%
Shaders
5,120
1,408 -72.5%
TMUs
320
88 -72.5%
ROPs
128
48 -62.5%
Compute Units
80
SM Count
22
Clocks
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1785 MHz
Game Clock
2015 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
6 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
6,144 -62.5%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
512.0 GB/s
336.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
1536 KB
L3 Cache
128 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
288.0 GPixel/s
85.68 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
720.0 GTexel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
23.04 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,440.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
157.1 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
46.08 TFLOPS (2:1)
10.05 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
80
Power
TDP
300 W
125 W
TDP (W)
300
125 -58.3%
Suggested PSU
700 W
300 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Turing
GPU Name
Navi 21
TU116
Generation
Navi II (RX 6000)
Mining GPUs
Process Size
7 nm
12 nm
Transistors
26,800 million
6,600 million
Die Size
520 mm²
284 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
51.5M / mm²
23.2M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Triple-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
229 mm 9 inches
Height
120 mm 4.7 inches
111 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.12x DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x4
Other
Launch Price
999 USD
799 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi
Successor
Navi III
View Radeon RX 6900 XT Details View CMP 30HX Details