NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single recorded benchmark for the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831. This result places the B300 SXM6 AC in the 100th percentile of all GPUs in the database, meaning it outperforms every other recorded graphics processor. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so no direct head-to-head comparison can be made from measured data. The B300 SXM6 AC's nearest rivals provide context for its performance tier. It leads the NVIDIA B200 by 7%, the NVIDIA H200 NVL by 10.4%, the AMD Instinct MI300X by 16.3%, and the NVIDIA L40S by 25%. These deltas show a consistent advantage across the server-grade competitor field.

The absence of benchmark data for the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 means the database cannot place it against the B300 SXM6 AC in any compute workload. Its 50th percentile ranking across all GPUs is a positional metric, not a measured score, and it has no rival entries to compare against. The B300 SXM6 AC, by contrast, has a fully populated benchmark profile with a verified average score of 369,831. This asymmetry in available data shapes the entire comparison: the B300 SXM6 AC is a measured leader, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 remains an unmeasured entry.

Where Each One Wins

The B300 SXM6 AC wins decisively in every measurable compute category. Its FP32 throughput of 76.99 TFLOPS doubles the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2's 32.69 TFLOPS. FP16 performance follows the same pattern, with the B300 SXM6 AC delivering 76.99 TFLOPS (1:1) against the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2's 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1). Texture rate favors the B300 SXM6 AC at 1,202.9 GTexel/s versus 510.7 GTexel/s. Memory capacity is a stark differentiator: the B300 SXM6 AC carries 288 GB of HBM3e across an 8192-bit bus, producing 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus for 576.0 GB/s. The B300 SXM6 AC also has more shading units (18,944 versus 9,728), more TMUs (592 versus 304), and more tensor cores (592 versus 304).

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 holds advantages in specific areas that matter for its intended role. Its pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s is nearly four times the B300 SXM6 AC's 48.77 GPixel/s, indicating stronger rasterization throughput per clock. It has 112 ROPs compared to the B300 SXM6 AC's 24, a substantial gap that reflects different rendering pipelines. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 includes 76 dedicated ray tracing cores, while the B300 SXM6 AC lists no RT core count. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 also supports the full DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs, whereas the B300 SXM6 AC lists N/A for all three. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 consumes 150 W, a fraction of the B300 SXM6 AC's 1100 W, and requires no power connectors, making it suitable for embedded and portable deployments.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different NVIDIA architectures and target entirely different market segments. The B300 SXM6 AC uses the GB110 chip built on the Blackwell Ultra architecture, part of the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 127.8M per mm². The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses the AD103 chip based on Ada Lovelace, from the Ada-MW generation. It is also fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC but packs 45,900 million transistors on a much smaller 379 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The B300 SXM6 AC integrates over four times the transistor count of the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2.

Clock behavior diverges sharply. The B300 SXM6 AC runs at a 1665 MHz base clock and boosts to 2032 MHz, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 starts at 930 MHz and boosts to 1680 MHz. Memory technology differs completely: the B300 SXM6 AC uses HBM3e at 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective), while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses GDDR6 at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The B300 SXM6 AC's memory bus is 8192 bits wide, exactly 32 times wider than the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2's 256-bit bus. The B300 SXM6 AC connects via PCIe 6.0 x16, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The B300 SXM6 AC is an SXM Module with no display outputs, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is an IGP with portable device dependent outputs.

Production timelines also differ. The B300 SXM6 AC released on September 10, 2025, with its predecessor listed as Server Hopper and successor as Server Rubin. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 released on March 20, 2023, with its predecessor listed as Ampere-MW and successor as Blackwell-MW. Both remain in active production. The B300 SXM6 AC's suggested PSU rating is 1500 W, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 lists no suggested PSU. The B300 SXM6 AC's power draw of 1100 W places it firmly in the data center class, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2's 150 W aligns with mobile and embedded workloads.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear separation of purpose. The B300 SXM6 AC is a server-grade compute accelerator with class-leading benchmark scores. Its 369,831 Geekbench OpenCL result places it at the 100th percentile of all GPUs, 7% ahead of the NVIDIA B200 and 10.4% ahead of the NVIDIA H200 NVL. Its 288 GB HBM3e memory with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth and 76.99 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it suitable for large-scale compute, AI training, and scientific simulation workloads. The 1100 W power envelope and SXM module form factor confirm its data center orientation.

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 serves a different function entirely. With 16 GB GDDR6, 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32, it offers a fraction of the compute throughput. Its 150 W power draw, lack of power connectors, and IGP form factor make it appropriate for embedded systems, portable devices, and applications where power and space constraints dominate. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2's higher pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and 112 ROPs suggest it retains rasterization capability suited to graphics output, reinforced by its full API support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The B300 SXM6 AC has no display outputs and no graphics API support, making it a pure compute device.

The data does not support a single winner across all criteria. The B300 SXM6 AC wins on raw compute, memory capacity, bandwidth, and transistor budget. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 wins on pixel throughput, ray tracing cores, API compatibility, power efficiency per watt, and physical integration flexibility. Buyers requiring maximum compute throughput should select the B300 SXM6 AC based on its measured benchmark dominance. Buyers requiring a low-power, embeddable GPU with graphics output support should select the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 based on its architectural features, though no benchmark data exists to verify its compute performance.

FAQ

Q: What benchmark score does the B300 SXM6 AC achieve?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC records a Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831, placing it in the 100th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 have any benchmark results?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark scores for the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, and its average benchmark score is 0.

Q: How does the B300 SXM6 AC compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It leads the NVIDIA B200 by 7%, the NVIDIA H200 NVL by 10.4%, the AMD Instinct MI300X by 16.3%, and the NVIDIA L40S by 25%.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each GPU?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC has 288 GB of HBM3e on an 8192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU supports graphics APIs?

A: The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The B300 SXM6 AC lists N/A for all graphics APIs and has no display outputs.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC consumes 1100 W with a suggested PSU of 1500 W. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 consumes 150 W and requires no power connectors.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB110 | AD103 |

| Architecture | Blackwell Ultra | Ada Lovelace |

| Generation | Server Blackwell (Bxx) | Ada-MW |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 208,000 million | 45,900 million |

| Die Size | 1628 mm² | 379 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 127.8M / mm² | 121.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1665 MHz | 930 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2032 MHz | 1680 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz, 8 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 288 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | HBM3e | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 8192 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 8.19 TB/s | 576.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 18,944 | 9,728 |

| TMUs | 592 | 304 |

| ROPs | 24 | 112 |

| RT Cores | Not listed | 76 |

| Tensor Cores | 592 | 304 |

| Pixel Rate | 48.77 GPixel/s | 188.2 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 1,202.9 GTexel/s | 510.7 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 76.99 TFLOPS | 32.69 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 76.99 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 1100 W | 150 W |

| Slot Width | SXM Module | IGP |

| Power Connectors | Not listed | None |

| Suggested PSU | 1500 W | Not listed |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 6.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX Support | N/A | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL Support | N/A | 4.6 |

| Vulkan Support | N/A | 1.4 |

| Release Date | 2025-09-10 | 2023-03-20 |

| Predecessor | Server Hopper | Ampere-MW |

| Successor | Server Rubin | Blackwell-MW |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 100 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 369,831 | 0 |