NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation reveals two products designed for entirely different segments of the GPU market. The B300 SXM6 AC is a server-class accelerator with a benchmark score of 369,831 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 100th percentile among all GPUs. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores and sits in the 50th percentile, making direct performance comparison impossible from the recorded data.

The B300 SXM6 AC is the clear choice for data center workloads requiring massive compute throughput, 288 GB of HBM3e memory, and 8.19 TB/s of memory bandwidth. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA B200 (7% lower average score), the NVIDIA H200 NVL (10.4% lower), the AMD Instinct MI300X (16.3% lower), and the NVIDIA L40S (25% lower). The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation targets portable and embedded systems, with a 50 W power envelope, no power connectors, and display outputs described as portable device dependent. It uses the Ada Lovelace architecture with 3,072 shading units and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

For organizations deploying server infrastructure, the B300 SXM6 AC delivers the highest recorded compute score in the database. For embedded or mobile applications where power consumption and physical footprint matter, the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation offers a compact IGP solution with modern API support including DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The data shows no overlap in target use cases, so the selection depends entirely on the deployment environment.

Where Each One Wins

The B300 SXM6 AC dominates in raw compute performance. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831 places it ahead of every listed rival, including the NVIDIA B200, which scores 345,482 (7% lower), and the AMD Instinct MI300X, which scores 317,994 (16.3% lower). The B300 SXM6 AC also leads in memory capacity with 288 GB versus the RTX 2000 Embedded's 8 GB, and in memory bandwidth with 8.19 TB/s versus 256.0 GB/s. Its shading unit count of 18,944 dwarfs the RTX 2000 Embedded's 3,072 units, and its FP32 throughput of 76.99 TFLOPS is more than six times the RTX 2000 Embedded's 12.35 TFLOPS.

The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation wins in power efficiency and physical integration. Its 50 W TDP is a fraction of the B300 SXM6 AC's 1100 W, and it requires no power connectors, whereas the B300 SXM6 AC suggests a 1500 W power supply. The RTX 2000 Embedded is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) form factor, while the B300 SXM6 AC is an SXM module. The RTX 2000 Embedded also offers display outputs, though portable device dependent, whereas the B300 SXM6 AC has no display outputs at all. The RTX 2000 Embedded supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the B300 SXM6 AC has no API support listed for DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan, indicating it is not designed for graphics rendering workloads.

The RTX 2000 Embedded also has a higher pixel rate at 96.48 GPixel/s versus the B300 SXM6 AC's 48.77 GPixel/s, despite having far fewer shading units. Its 48 ROPs double the B300 SXM6 AC's 24 ROPs. These figures indicate the RTX 2000 Embedded is optimized for rasterization output, while the B300 SXM6 AC prioritizes compute density.

Architecture Differences

The B300 SXM6 AC uses the GB110 chip built on the Blackwell Ultra architecture, produced on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 127.8 million per mm². The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation uses the AD107 chip on the Ada Lovelace architecture, also on a 5 nm TSMC process, but with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, giving a density of 118.9 million per mm². The B300 SXM6 AC therefore packs over ten times the transistor count into a die roughly ten times larger.

The B300 SXM6 AC features 592 tensor cores and 592 texture mapping units, but lists no RT cores, suggesting a compute-focused design without dedicated ray tracing hardware. The RTX 2000 Embedded includes 96 tensor cores, 24 RT cores, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The B300 SXM6 AC's ROP count of 24 is notably low relative to its compute resources, reinforcing its role as a data center accelerator rather than a graphics card.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The B300 SXM6 AC uses 288 GB of HBM3e on an 8192-bit bus, while the RTX 2000 Embedded uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The B300 SXM6 AC's memory clock is 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective, and the RTX 2000 Embedded's memory clock is also 2000 MHz but with 16 Gbps effective. The bus width difference explains the bandwidth gap: 8.19 TB/s versus 256.0 GB/s.

The B300 SXM6 AC uses a PCIe 6.0 x16 bus interface, while the RTX 2000 Embedded uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The B300 SXM6 AC has no display outputs, while the RTX 2000 Embedded's display outputs are portable device dependent. The B300 SXM6 AC's release date is September 10, 2025, with a predecessor in Server Hopper and successor in Server Rubin. The RTX 2000 Embedded released March 20, 2023, succeeding Ampere-MW and preceding Blackwell-MW.

The B300 SXM6 AC's base clock is 1665 MHz with a boost clock of 2032 MHz, while the RTX 2000 Embedded has a base clock of 1530 MHz and a boost clock of 2010 MHz. The B300 SXM6 AC's texture rate is 1,202.9 GTexel/s versus 193.0 GTexel/s for the RTX 2000 Embedded. The FP16 performance mirrors FP32 on both parts at 1:1 ratios, with the B300 SXM6 AC delivering 76.99 TFLOPS and the RTX 2000 Embedded delivering 12.35 TFLOPS.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC records a Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831 and sits in the 100th percentile among all GPUs. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark scores and sits in the 50th percentile.

Q: How does the B300 SXM6 AC compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC leads the NVIDIA B200 by 7%, the NVIDIA H200 NVL by 10.4%, the AMD Instinct MI300X by 16.3%, and the NVIDIA L40S by 25% in average benchmark score.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC uses 288 GB of HBM3e on an 8192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The RTX 2000 Embedded uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC has a TDP of 1100 W and a suggested power supply of 1500 W. The RTX 2000 Embedded has a TDP of 50 W and requires no power connectors.

Q: Which GPU supports modern graphics APIs?

A: The RTX 2000 Embedded supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The B300 SXM6 AC lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan.

Q: What form factors do these GPUs use?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC is an SXM Module, while the RTX 2000 Embedded is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) form factor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the B300 SXM6 AC and the RTX 2000 Embedded. The only benchmark available for the B300 SXM6 AC is Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 369,831. The RTX 2000 Embedded has no benchmark entries in the database.

The B300 SXM6 AC's score of 369,831 can be contextualized against its nearest rivals. The NVIDIA B200 averages 345,482, which is 7% lower. The NVIDIA H200 NVL averages 334,891, which is 10.4% lower. The AMD Instinct MI300X averages 317,994, which is 16.3% lower. The NVIDIA L40S averages 295,763, which is 25% lower. These deltas show the B300 SXM6 AC maintains a consistent advantage of at least 7% over the next-best competitor and stretches to a full quarter ahead of the L40S.

Compute throughput figures reinforce the gap. The B300 SXM6 AC delivers 76.99 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16, while the RTX 2000 Embedded delivers 12.35 TFLOPS in both. The B300 SXM6 AC's shading unit count of 18,944 is roughly 6.2 times the RTX 2000 Embedded's 3,072, and its texture rate of 1,202.9 GTexel/s is over six times higher than the 193.0 GTexel/s of the RTX 2000 Embedded.

Memory bandwidth follows a similar pattern. The B300 SXM6 AC's 8.19 TB/s is approximately 32 times the RTX 2000 Embedded's 256.0 GB/s. The pixel rate, however, favors the RTX 2000 Embedded at 96.48 GPixel/s versus the B300 SXM6 AC's 48.77 GPixel/s. The RTX 2000 Embedded's higher ROP count of 48 versus 24 explains this result.

The B300 SXM6 AC's transistor count of 208,000 million dwarfs the RTX 2000 Embedded's 18,900 million, and its die size of 1628 mm² compares to 159 mm². Both are built on TSMC's 5 nm process, with the B300 SXM6 AC achieving a higher transistor density of 127.8 million per mm² versus 118.9 million per mm².

Clock speeds are comparable: the B300 SXM6 AC boosts to 2032 MHz, and the RTX 2000 Embedded boosts to 2010 MHz. The B300 SXM6 AC's base clock is 1665 MHz versus 1530 MHz for the RTX 2000 Embedded. The effective memory clock on the RTX 2000 Embedded is 16 Gbps, double the 8 Gbps effective rate of the B300 SXM6 AC, though the B300 SXM6 AC compensates with a far wider memory bus.

The B300 SXM6 AC supports PCIe 6.0 x16, while the RTX 2000 Embedded supports PCIe 4.0 x16. The B300 SXM6 AC has no display outputs, while the RTX 2000 Embedded's outputs are portable device dependent. The B300 SXM6 AC's production status is Active, as is the RTX 2000 Embedded's. The B300 SXM6 AC released on September 10, 2025, and the RTX 2000 Embedded released on March 20, 2023.