NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC vs NVIDIA Jetson T5000 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records a single OpenCL benchmark result for the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC, with a score of 369,831. The NVIDIA Jetson T5000 has no recorded benchmark scores, so direct comparison is limited to the B300's performance against its nearest rivals.

The B300 SXM6 AC sits at the 100th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 369,831 places it 7% ahead of the NVIDIA B200, which scores 345,482. Against the NVIDIA H200 NVL, the B300 holds a 10.4% advantage, with the H200 NVL scoring 334,891. The AMD Instinct MI300X trails by 16.3%, recording 317,994. The NVIDIA L40S is the farthest behind among the listed rivals, with a 25% gap, scoring 295,763.

These deltas indicate a clear performance hierarchy. The B300 leads every comparable accelerator in the database by a meaningful margin. The smallest gap, 7% over the B200, still represents a substantial lead for a single-generation comparison. The 25% lead over the L40S is particularly notable, as that GPU serves a different market segment, but the data shows the B300's OpenCL output is decisively higher.

The Jetson T5000, by contrast, has no benchmark entries in the database. Its percentile rank is 50, which reflects the median position of all recorded GPUs, but with an average score of zero, the T5000 cannot be positioned against the B300 or any other accelerator in terms of measured performance. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and neither product records a win in the database.

FAQ

Q: How does the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC compare to the NVIDIA B200 in benchmark performance?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC records an average benchmark score of 369,831, which is 7% higher than the B200's average of 345,482. This places the B300 ahead of its immediate predecessor in the same server Blackwell generation.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two products?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC uses 288 GB of HBM3e memory with an 8192-bit bus and 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The Jetson T5000 uses 128 GB of LPDDR5X memory with a 256-bit bus and 273.2 GB/s bandwidth. The B300 has more than double the capacity and over 30 times the bandwidth.

Q: Are there any recorded benchmark scores for the Jetson T5000?

A: No. The database lists no benchmarks for the Jetson T5000. Its average benchmark score is zero, and it has no nearest rivals listed. The B300 SXM6 AC, in contrast, has one OpenCL benchmark result of 369,831.

Q: What are the power requirements for each product?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC has a TDP of 1100 W and a suggested PSU of 1500 W. The Jetson T5000 has a TDP of 120 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W. The B300 draws roughly nine times the power of the T5000.

Q: How do the shading unit counts differ?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC contains 18,944 shading units, while the Jetson T5000 contains 2,560. The B300 also has 592 tensor cores versus 96 in the T5000, and 592 TMUs versus 80 in the T5000.

Q: What is the release date difference between the two products?

A: The Jetson T5000 was released on 2025-08-26, and the B300 SXM6 AC was released on 2025-09-10. Both are currently listed as Active in production status.

Architecture Differences

The B300 SXM6 AC uses the GB110 chip built on the Blackwell Ultra architecture, while the Jetson T5000 uses the GB10B chip on the base Blackwell architecture. Both are fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, but the chip designs diverge substantially.

The B300's die measures 1628 mm² and contains 208,000 million transistors, yielding a density of 127.8M transistors per mm². The T5000's die is 391 mm², and its transistor count is listed as unknown in the database. The B300's die is over four times larger, reflecting a much more complex silicon design with far more compute resources.

Clock speeds differ meaningfully. The B300 has a base clock of 1665 MHz and a boost clock of 2032 MHz. The T5000 operates at a base of 1386 MHz and a boost of 1575 MHz. The B300 runs faster in absolute terms, though the T5000's lower clocks align with its much lower power envelope.

Memory subsystems are fundamentally different. The B300 uses HBM3e with 288 GB capacity, an 8192-bit bus, and 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The T5000 uses LPDDR5X with 128 GB capacity, a 256-bit bus, and 273.2 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clock rates also differ: the B300's memory runs at 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective data rate, while the T5000's memory runs at 1067 MHz with 8.5 Gbps effective.

Compute resources show a wide gap. The B300 has 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The T5000 has 2,560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The T5000 includes 20 ray tracing cores, a feature not listed for the B300. Tensor core counts are 592 for the B300 and 96 for the T5000.

Pixel and texture rates follow the resource counts. The B300 achieves 48.77 GPixel/s and 1,202.9 GTexel/s. The T5000 achieves 50.40 GPixel/s and 126.0 GTexel/s. Despite having fewer ROPs, the T5000's pixel rate is slightly higher, while the B300's texture rate is nearly ten times greater.

FP32 and FP16 performance are each listed at 76.99 TFLOPS for the B300, with a 1:1 ratio. The T5000 delivers 8.064 TFLOPS in both precisions, also at 1:1. The B300 provides roughly 9.5 times the compute throughput.

Form factors differ entirely. The B300 is an SXM module with no display outputs and no power connectors listed. The T5000 is an IGP with no display outputs and no power connectors, measuring 87 mm in length, 100 mm in height, and 15 mm in width. The B300's dimensions are not listed.

Both products share the same generation classification (Server Blackwell), predecessor (Server Hopper), and successor (Server Rubin). Both list no API support for DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan, which is consistent with server-oriented accelerators that lack consumer graphics interfaces.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear separation in purpose and capability between these two NVIDIA products. The B300 SXM6 AC is a high-power, high-throughput accelerator with a 1100 W TDP, 288 GB of HBM3e memory, and a benchmark score of 369,831 that places it at the 100th percentile. The Jetson T5000 is a low-power, compact IGP with a 120 W TDP, 128 GB of LPDDR5X memory, and no recorded benchmark scores.

For workloads requiring maximum compute density, memory bandwidth, and FP32 throughput, the B300 is the only option with measured performance data. Its 8.19 TB/s bandwidth and 76.99 TFLOPS FP32 performance are far beyond the T5000's 273.2 GB/s and 8.064 TFLOPS. The B300's 7% lead over the B200 and 16.3% lead over the AMD Instinct MI300X place it at the top of the database's recorded accelerators.

For environments constrained by power and physical size, the T5000 presents a different profile. Its 120 W TDP allows operation with a 300 W suggested PSU, and its compact 87 mm by 100 mm by 15 mm dimensions fit in spaces where an SXM module would not. The T5000's 50th percentile rank reflects its position as a median performer, though the absence of benchmark scores prevents a quantitative assessment.

The T5000's ray tracing cores, absent from the B300's listed specifications, suggest a different feature set. The B300's lack of display outputs and graphics APIs aligns with pure compute acceleration. The T5000 also lacks display outputs, so neither product targets graphics rendering.

The release dates are close, with the T5000 arriving on 2025-08-26 and the B300 on 2025-09-10. Both are active products in the same server generation, yet the silicon designs could not be more different. The B300's 1628 mm² die and 208,000 million transistors represent a maximal compute design. The T5000's 391 mm² die serves a power-efficient edge or embedded role.

The launch MSRP for the T5000 is 2,999 USD. The B300 has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC | NVIDIA Jetson T5000 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB110 | GB10B |

| Architecture | Blackwell Ultra | Blackwell |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 208,000 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 1628 mm² | 391 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 127.8M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 1665 MHz | 1386 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2032 MHz | 1575 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz 8 Gbps effective | 1067 MHz 8.5 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 288 GB | 128 GB |

| Memory Type | HBM3e | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus Width | 8192 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 8.19 TB/s | 273.2 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 18944 | 2560 |

| TMUs | 592 | 80 |

| ROPs | 24 | 32 |

| RT Cores | null | 20 |

| Tensor Cores | 592 | 96 |

| Pixel Rate | 48.77 GPixel/s | 50.40 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 1,202.9 GTexel/s | 126.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 76.99 TFLOPS | 8.064 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 76.99 TFLOPS (1:1) | 8.064 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 1100 W | 120 W |

| Slot Width | SXM Module | IGP |

| Power Connectors | null | None |

| Suggested PSU | 1500 W | 300 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 6.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Dimensions | null | 87 mm 3.4 inches x 100 mm 3.9 inches x 15 mm 0.6 inches |

| Release Date | 2025-09-10 | 2025-08-26 |

| Launch MSRP | null | 2,999 USD |

| Benchmark Score | 369831 | 0 |

| Percentile | 100 | 50 |