NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 Comparison

NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 represent two vastly different corners of the GPU market, one a server-grade accelerator built for massive compute workloads and the other a low-power desktop graphics card for basic rendering and display output. The database shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between them, but their recorded scores and specifications place them at opposite ends of the performance spectrum.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC dominates in raw compute performance, as evidenced by its Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831, which places it in the 100th percentile of all GPUs in the database. This score is 7% higher than the NVIDIA B200 (345,482), 10.4% higher than the NVIDIA H200 NVL (334,891), 16.3% higher than the AMD Instinct MI300X (317,994), and 25% higher than the NVIDIA L40S (295,763). The B300 SXM6 AC is clearly optimized for environments where massive parallel processing is required, such as AI training, scientific simulations, and large-scale data center workloads. Its 288 GB of HBM3e memory and 8.19 TB/s bandwidth provide the capacity and throughput needed for models and datasets that far exceed the memory limits of consumer hardware.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010, in contrast, wins in the categories of power efficiency, physical footprint, and desktop usability. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,893 places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, which is modest but still functional for entry-level 3D acceleration. The RTX 4010 draws only 50 W and requires just a 250 W suggested PSU, making it suitable for low-power systems, while its single-slot design and 163 mm length allow it to fit into compact chassis. It also outputs video through 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, whereas the B300 SXM6 AC has no display outputs at all, meaning the B300 is useless for direct monitor connection. The RTX 4010 is the only one of the two that can function as a traditional graphics card for a workstation or desktop PC.

The Verdict

The data indicates that these products serve entirely different purposes with no overlap in target use cases. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC is the clear choice for any workload requiring extreme compute density, huge memory capacity, or maximum throughput in a server rack. Its benchmark score of 369,831 in Geekbench OpenCL is the highest recorded in its comparison group, and its 100th percentile ranking confirms it belongs at the top of the performance hierarchy. It uses a 5 nm process from TSMC, packs 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, and operates at a 1100 W TDP, all of which point to a device built for institutional-scale computing.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is the appropriate pick for a desktop system that needs basic 3D acceleration, multi-monitor output, and low power consumption. Its 50 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it a drop-in card for standard office PCs or small form factor builds. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,893 is within 1% of several nearby rivals: it trails the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB by 0.5%, the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF by 0.6%, the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB by 0.7%, and the Quadro P600 by 1%. This tight clustering suggests the RTX 4010 delivers performance in line with its immediate competition in the database, making it a predictable choice for users who need a simple, low-profile GPU.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010, so a direct score comparison is not possible. However, the available single-benchmark results for each card provide a clear picture of their relative capabilities. The B300 SXM6 AC records a Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831, while the RTX 4010 records a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,893. These tests measure different aspects of GPU performance, but the magnitude of the B300's score, combined with its 100th percentile ranking, indicates a compute capability that is orders of magnitude beyond what the RTX 4010 can offer. The RTX 4010's 18th percentile ranking shows it sits in the lower quarter of all GPUs in the database, suitable for light tasks but not for heavy compute.

The B300 SXM6 AC outperforms its nearest rivals by significant margins: 7% over the B200, 10.4% over the H200 NVL, 16.3% over the MI300X, and 25% over the L40S. These delta percentages confirm that the B300 is not just marginally faster but clearly ahead of the other high-end accelerators in its class. The RTX 4010, by contrast, is nearly identical in performance to its nearest rivals, with all deltas under 1%. This means the RTX 4010 does not stand out in its own tier; it is simply one of several similar low-end cards. The B300 SXM6 AC establishes a leadership position, while the RTX 4010 blends into the pack.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC than the NVIDIA B200?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC scores 369,831 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 7% higher than the B200's average score of 345,482.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC uses 288 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 8.19 TB/s.

Q: Can the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 connect to displays?

A: Yes, the RTX 4010 has 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC has no display outputs.

Q: What is the power requirement for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010?

A: The RTX 4010 has a 50 W TDP and requires a 250 W suggested PSU. It uses no power connectors.

Q: How does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 compare to the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The RTX 4010 scores 2,893, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB's score of 2,913.

Q: Which process nodes do these two GPUs use?

A: The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC uses a 5 nm process from TSMC, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 uses an 8 nm process from Samsung.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is fundamental. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC is built on the Blackwell Ultra architecture with the GB110 chip, part of the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. It uses a 5 nm process at TSMC and contains 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 127.8 million per mm². The chip has 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, along with 592 tensor cores. Its base clock is 1665 MHz with a boost of 2032 MHz, and it operates with a TDP of 1100 W. The memory subsystem is HBM3e, running at 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective), across an 8192-bit interface for a bandwidth of 8.19 TB/s. The B300 SXM6 AC uses a PCIe 6.0 x16 bus interface and is packaged as an SXM module, meaning it is designed for server chassis rather than desktop slots. It has no display outputs and no DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan API support, confirming its compute-only role.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is built on the older Ampere architecture with the GA107 chip, part of the GeForce 40-series. It uses an 8 nm process at Samsung and contains 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, for a transistor density of 43.5 million per mm². The chip has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, 16 ROPs, 6 RT cores, and 24 tensor cores. Its base clock is 1417 MHz with a boost of 1762 MHz, and it has a TDP of just 50 W. The memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s. The RTX 4010 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and is a single-slot card measuring 163 mm in length and 69 mm in height. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The transistor count difference is stark: the B300 SXM6 AC packs over 23 times more transistors than the RTX 4010, and the die area is over 8 times larger. The B300's memory bandwidth is more than 85 times that of the RTX 4010, and its FP32 compute of 76.99 TFLOPS dwarfs the RTX 4010's 2.706 TFLOPS. The B300 SXM6 AC also leads in pixel rate (48.77 GPixel/s vs 28.19 GPixel/s) and texture rate (1,202.9 GTexel/s vs 42.29 GTexel/s). These figures illustrate a server accelerator with massive parallel throughput and a consumer card optimized for minimal power draw and physical footprint. The B300 SXM6 AC is the successor to Server Hopper hardware and predecessor to Server Rubin, while the RTX 4010 follows the GeForce 30 series and precedes the GeForce 50 series.