NVIDIA B200 SXM6 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the NVIDIA B200 SXM6 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Both entries show an average benchmark score of zero and a percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs, indicating that neither part has accumulated a verified performance dataset in the system. This absence of measured scores means a direct numerical comparison of compute throughput, memory performance, or real-world application results is not possible from the recorded data.

The gap between these two products is defined entirely by their specifications rather than by tested outcomes. The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 is a server module built around the GB100 chip with a Blackwell architecture, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a dual-slot add-in card using the 7G105 chip with a TrueGPU architecture. Their positioning could hardly be more different: one targets dense data center compute, the other targets a conventional workstation or desktop slot. Without benchmark scores, the analysis must rely on the raw capabilities listed in the database, which reveal a massive disparity in scale, memory capacity, and compute throughput.

The most significant single-number difference is memory. The B200 SXM6 carries 180 GB of HBM3e across an 8192-bit bus, delivering 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s. That is a difference of 156 GB in capacity and roughly 19 times the memory bandwidth in favor of the NVIDIA part. In FP32 compute, the B200 SXM6 delivers 69.34 TFLOPS, while the LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. The B200 SXM6 is roughly 2.8 times faster in single-precision floating-point work. In FP16, the B200 SXM6 again delivers 69.34 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, making the B200 SXM6 approximately 1.4 times faster in FP16 throughput.

Pixel throughput favors the Lisuan card. The LX PRO achieves a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, whereas the B200 SXM6 records 43.92 GPixel/s. This is over 4.3 times higher for the LX PRO, which reflects its 96 ROPs compared to just 24 on the B200 SXM6. Texture rate goes the other way: the B200 SXM6 posts 1,083.4 GTexel/s against 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX PRO, a roughly 2.8 times advantage for the NVIDIA module.

The shading unit counts reinforce the compute split. The B200 SXM6 has 18,944 shading units and 592 TMUs, while the LX PRO has 6,144 shading units and 192 TMUs. The B200 SXM6 also includes 592 tensor cores, a feature entirely absent from the LX PRO listing. Clock behavior is also documented differently: the B200 SXM6 has a base clock of 120 MHz and a boost clock of 1830 MHz, while the LX PRO does not list base or boost clocks in the database. Memory clocks tell a different story. The B200 SXM6 memory runs at 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective, while the LX PRO memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The LX PRO uses faster memory chips, but the narrow 192-bit bus limits total bandwidth.

The LX PRO is the only one of the two with display outputs, offering 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The B200 SXM6 has no display outputs, which aligns with its role as a compute module. API support follows the same pattern. The LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The B200 SXM6 lists N/A for all three graphics APIs, confirming it is not intended for any graphics workload. Power consumption also differs greatly: the B200 SXM6 has a TDP of 1000 W with a suggested PSU of 1400 W, while the LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 has 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 432.0 GB/s. The B200 SXM6 is roughly 19 times higher.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO support display outputs?

A: Yes, the LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 has no display outputs.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 delivers 69.34 TFLOPS in FP32, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. The B200 SXM6 is about 2.8 times faster.

Q: What is the memory type and bus width for each GPU?

A: The B200 SXM6 uses 180 GB of HBM3e on an 8192-bit bus. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus.

Q: Which GPU has tensor cores?

A: The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 has 592 tensor cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO does not list any tensor cores in the database.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The B200 SXM6 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The LX PRO uses a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 is built on the GB100 chip using the Blackwell architecture, a server-oriented design in the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 127.8M per mm². The chip is massive, reflecting a design goal of maximum compute density for data center workloads. Its predecessor is listed as Server Hopper, and its successor is Server Rubin, placing it in a clear product lineage.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is built on the 7G105 chip using the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The database does not list transistor count, die size, or transistor density for this chip, so a direct comparison of physical complexity is not possible. The LX PRO has no predecessor or successor listed, suggesting it is a standalone design in the database.

Memory architecture separates the two significantly. The B200 SXM6 uses HBM3e with an 8192-bit bus, which is typical for high-bandwidth compute accelerators. The LX PRO uses GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus, which is more common for consumer or workstation graphics cards. The B200 SXM6 has no display outputs and no graphics API support, confirming it is a pure compute accelerator. The LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, and provides four DisplayPort outputs, indicating it can function as a conventional graphics card.

The B200 SXM6 includes tensor cores, 592 of them, which are essential for AI and machine learning workloads. The LX PRO does not list tensor cores. The B200 SXM6 also has a much higher texture rate at 1,083.4 GTexel/s, while the LX PRO has a higher pixel rate at 192.0 GPixel/s. This suggests the B200 SXM6 is optimized for compute and texture-heavy operations, while the LX PRO is better suited to pixel-driven graphics rendering.

Power and physical design also differ. The B200 SXM6 is an SXM module, a board form factor designed for dense server chassis, with a TDP of 1000 W and a suggested PSU of 1400 W. The LX PRO is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, with a 1x 16-pin power connector, a TDP of 225 W, and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The B200 SXM6 uses PCIe 6.0 x16, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Release timing is also recorded: the B200 SXM6 was released on 2024-10-31, and the LX PRO was released on 2026-03-16.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to two different devices for two different jobs. The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 is a high-power, high-bandwidth compute accelerator with no graphics outputs, no graphics API support, and a 1000 W TDP. Its 180 GB of HBM3e, 8.19 TB/s bandwidth, 69.34 TFLOPS FP32, and 592 tensor cores make it suitable for large-scale AI training, scientific simulation, and data center compute. The 208,000 million transistors and 1628 mm² die indicate a top-tier part in its generation.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a more conventional dual-slot graphics card with 24 GB of GDDR6, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16. It has display outputs, supports modern graphics APIs, and runs on a 225 W TDP. Its higher pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and 96 ROPs make it more capable for rasterization-driven tasks. It is smaller, uses less power, and fits in a standard PCIe 4.0 x16 slot.

The data does not include benchmark scores, so the verdict rests on specification analysis. The B200 SXM6 is the clear choice for compute-heavy, memory-hungry workloads that do not require a display. The LX PRO is the only option for users who need a GPU with video outputs and graphics API support. There is no overlap in display capability, and the compute gap is substantial. The B200 SXM6 has a launch MSRP of 34,999 USD, while the LX PRO has no recorded launch MSRP.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every recorded specification field. The B200 SXM6 uses the GB100 chip with a Blackwell architecture, while the LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with a TrueGPU architecture. The process node is 5 nm for the B200 SXM6 and 6 nm for the LX PRO, both at TSMC. Transistor count is 208,000 million for the B200 SXM6; it is unknown for the LX PRO. Die size is 1628 mm² for the B200 SXM6; it is unknown for the LX PRO.

Memory size is 180 GB HBM3e for the B200 SXM6 versus 24 GB GDDR6 for the LX PRO. Bus width is 8192 bit versus 192 bit. Bandwidth is 8.19 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. Shading units are 18,944 versus 6,144. TMUs are 592 versus 192. ROPs are 24 versus 96. Tensor cores are 592 on the B200 SXM6 and are not listed for the LX PRO.

Pixel rate is 43.92 GPixel/s for the B200 SXM6 and 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO. Texture rate is 1,083.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 69.34 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 is 69.34 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). TDP is 1000 W versus 225 W. Slot width is SXM Module versus Dual-slot. Power connectors are not listed for the B200 SXM6 and are 1x 16-pin for the LX PRO. Suggested PSU is 1400 W versus 550 W.

Bus interface is PCIe 6.0 x16 for the B200 SXM6 and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX PRO. Display outputs are none for the B200 SXM6 and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for the LX PRO. API support is N/A for the B200 SXM6 and includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3 for the LX PRO. Dimensions are not listed for the B200 SXM6; the LX PRO is 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Release dates are 2024-10-31 for the B200 SXM6 and 2026-03-16 for the LX PRO. The B200 SXM6 has a launch MSRP of 34,999 USD, and the LX PRO has none recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 wins in memory capacity, memory bandwidth, FP32 compute, FP16 compute, texture rate, shading units, TMUs, and tensor core availability. It also has a larger transistor count and die size, and it supports a faster PCIe 6.0 x16 interface. Its 8.19 TB/s bandwidth and 180 GB capacity are unmatched by the LX PRO, which makes the B200 SXM6 the stronger option for large models and data-intensive operations.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in pixel rate, ROP count, memory clock speed, display outputs, graphics API support, and power efficiency on paper. Its 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate is over four times the B200 SXM6, and its 96 ROPs are four times higher. It is the only one of the two that can drive a display, and it supports modern graphics APIs. Its 225 W TDP is far below the 1000 W of the B200 SXM6, which makes it easier to integrate into conventional systems.

The split is clean. The B200 SXM6 is a compute accelerator for servers where memory bandwidth and FP32/FP16 throughput are critical. The LX PRO is a graphics card for rendering, display, and standard workstation use where pixel throughput and API compatibility matter. The data does not include any benchmark results, so these conclusions are based strictly on the recorded specification fields.