NVIDIA B200 SXM6 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the NVIDIA B200 SXM6 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. The B200 SXM6 has an empty benchmark array, meaning no standardized test scores are available for it in the current data. The RTX 5070 Ti, by contrast, has ten recorded benchmark entries that span DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads.

For the RTX 5070 Ti, the recorded data shows a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,604. Its Geekbench OpenCL result reaches 212,363, while the Geekbench Vulkan score climbs to 225,122. The Passmark suite shows a G3D score of 32,974, a GPU compute score of 20,203, and a G2D result of 1,332. DirectX-specific Passmark scores include 351 for DirectX 9, 300 for DirectX 11, 192 for DirectX 10, and 127 for DirectX 12.

The B200 SXM6 has no comparable numbers in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and its percentile versus all GPUs sits at 50. The RTX 5070 Ti, with an average benchmark score of 49,957, lands at the 86th percentile across all GPUs. That percentile gap, 50 versus 86, is the most direct statistical comparison available between these two products. The B200 SXM6 is a server accelerator with no display outputs and no graphics API support, which explains why no gaming or graphics benchmarks exist for it. The RTX 5070 Ti, on the other hand, is a consumer graphics card with full DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support.

Looking at the RTX 5070 Ti's nearest rivals in the database provides context for its performance tier. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50,001, a delta of -0.1 percent relative to the RTX 5070 Ti. The Intel Arc A550M scores 49,737, a delta of 0.4 percent. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50,951, which is 2 percent higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 48,477, putting it 3.1 percent behind the RTX 5070 Ti. These deltas show the RTX 5070 Ti sits within a narrow competitive band around the 50,000 score mark, with the RX 6900 XT as the only rival in the list that exceeds it by a notable margin.

Since the B200 SXM6 has no benchmark scores, the head-to-head comparison must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than measured performance. The recorded data shows the B200 SXM6 delivers 69.34 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 performance, while the RTX 5070 Ti delivers 43.94 TFLOPS in both. That is a substantial theoretical compute advantage for the server part, roughly 58 percent higher FP32 throughput. The texture rate also favors the B200 SXM6 at 1,083.4 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s for the RTX 5070 Ti. However, the pixel rate tells the opposite story: the RTX 5070 Ti achieves 235.4 GPixel/s while the B200 SXM6 manages only 43.92 GPixel/s. This reflects the B200's design focus on compute rather than rasterization output.

The Verdict

The data indicates these are fundamentally different products serving different workloads. The B200 SXM6 is a data center accelerator with 180 GB of HBM3e memory, an 8192-bit memory bus, and 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. Its 1,000 W power envelope and SXM module form factor place it firmly in server infrastructure. The RTX 5070 Ti is a consumer graphics card with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, a 256-bit bus, and 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its 300 W TDP, dual-slot design, and display outputs make it suitable for desktop systems.

The B200 SXM6 has no graphics API support, no display outputs, and no recorded benchmarks. That means for any workload requiring rasterization, DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan, the RTX 5070 Ti is the only option with measured performance. For compute-heavy tasks that can leverage the B200's massive memory capacity and bandwidth, the specification sheet shows clear advantages: 180 GB versus 16 GB of memory, 8.19 TB/s versus 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and 69.34 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput.

The percentile rankings reinforce the divide. The B200 SXM6 sits at the 50th percentile across all GPUs, but that figure reflects its zero benchmark scores rather than real-world performance. The RTX 5070 Ti's 86th percentile is backed by actual test data. The RTX 5070 Ti's nearest rivals, all within roughly 3 percent of its average score, show it competes closely with high-end AMD Radeon cards from the RX 6000 series and the older Vega 64.

The RTX 5070 Ti also holds advantages in clock speeds, with a base clock of 2,295 MHz and boost of 2,452 MHz versus the B200's 120 MHz base and 1,830 MHz boost. The B200's boost clock is significantly lower because it relies on massive parallelism across 18,944 shading units rather than high per-core clocks. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The B200 has 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, and only 24 ROPs. That ROP count of 24 is extraordinarily low for a chip with such compute resources, confirming its role as a compute-first accelerator.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each product?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 49,957. The B200 SXM6 has an average benchmark score of zero, as no benchmark results are recorded for it in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti scores 49,957 on average, while the RX 6800 XT scores 48,477. That gives the RTX 5070 Ti a 3.1 percent advantage over the RX 6800 XT.

Q: Which product has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The B200 SXM6 has 8.19 TB/s of memory bandwidth across an 8192-bit bus using HBM3e. The RTX 5070 Ti has 896.0 GB/s across a 256-bit bus using GDDR7.

Q: Does the B200 SXM6 support DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan?

A: No. The B200 SXM6 records N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan API support. It also has no display outputs.

Q: What is the transistor count difference between the two chips?

A: The B200 SXM6 uses the GB100 chip with 208,000 million transistors. The RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip with 45,600 million transistors. The B200's die size is 1,628 mm², while the RTX 5070 Ti's die is 378 mm².

Q: What percentile does each product rank at versus all GPUs?

A: The B200 SXM6 ranks at the 50th percentile. The RTX 5070 Ti ranks at the 86th percentile.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every specification category. The B200 SXM6 uses the GB100 chip while the RTX 5070 Ti uses GB203. Both are built on a 5 nm TSMC process, but the B200 packs 208,000 million transistors on a 1,628 mm² die, while the RTX 5070 Ti has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. Transistor density is similar, with the B200 at 127.8M per mm² and the RTX 5070 Ti at 120.6M per mm².

Clock speeds diverge sharply. The B200 has a base clock of 120 MHz and a boost of 1,830 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti runs at 2,295 MHz base and 2,452 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ: the B200 operates at 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective speed, while the RTX 5070 Ti runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. The memory type, capacity, bus width, and bandwidth all favor the B200: HBM3e versus GDDR7, 180 GB versus 16 GB, 8192-bit versus 256-bit, and 8.19 TB/s versus 896.0 GB/s.

Compute resources show a mixed picture. The B200 has 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The B200 has 592 tensor cores and no RT cores listed. The RTX 5070 Ti has 280 tensor cores and 70 RT cores. FP32 and FP16 performance both favor the B200 at 69.34 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS. Texture rate favors the B200 at 1,083.4 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s, but pixel rate favors the RTX 5070 Ti at 235.4 GPixel/s versus 43.92 GPixel/s.

Power and physical specifications differ completely. The B200 has a TDP of 1,000 W, requires a 1,400 W power supply, and uses an SXM module slot. The RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP, needs a 700 W power supply, uses a dual-slot design with a 1x 16-pin connector, and measures 304 mm by 137 mm by 48 mm. The B200 has no display outputs while the RTX 5070 Ti has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The bus interface differs too: PCIe 6.0 x16 for the B200 versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 5070 Ti.

Architecture Differences

The B200 SXM6 uses the Blackwell architecture while the RTX 5070 Ti uses Blackwell 2.0. Both come from NVIDIA, but they target different market segments. The B200 belongs to the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation with a release date of October 31, 2024. The RTX 5070 Ti belongs to the GeForce 50 series with a release date of February 19, 2025.

The B200's predecessor is listed as Server Hopper, and its successor is Server Rubin. The RTX 5070 Ti's predecessor is GeForce 40, and its successor is GeForce 60. These lineage entries confirm the two products track separate product roadmaps within NVIDIA's lineup.

The B200 uses a 5 nm process with 208,000 million transistors and a die size of 1,628 mm². The RTX 5070 Ti also uses a 5 nm process but with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The B200 has 592 tensor cores and no RT cores, while the RTX 5070 Ti has 280 tensor cores and 70 RT cores. The lack of RT cores on the B200 aligns with its server positioning, as ray tracing acceleration is a consumer graphics feature. The B200 also lacks any graphics API support, while the RTX 5070 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The B200's memory architecture uses HBM3e across an 8192-bit bus, delivering 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti uses GDDR7 across a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s. The B200's 180 GB capacity is more than eleven times the RTX 5070 Ti's 16 GB. The B200's 24 ROPs produce a pixel rate of 43.92 GPixel/s, while the RTX 5070 Ti's 96 ROPs produce 235.4 GPixel/s. This reflects the B200's compute-oriented design, where texture and shading throughput matter more than raster output.

Where Each One Wins

The B200 SXM6 wins in compute throughput and memory capacity. Its FP32 and FP16 performance of 69.34 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 5070 Ti's 43.94 TFLOPS. Its 8.19 TB/s memory bandwidth dwarfs the RTX 5070 Ti's 896.0 GB/s. The 180 GB memory capacity supports large data sets that would not fit in the RTX 5070 Ti's 16 GB. The B200 also has a higher texture rate at 1,083.4 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s.

The RTX 5070 Ti wins in graphics rendering and consumer-facing features. Its 235.4 GPixel/s pixel rate is more than five times the B200's 43.92 GPixel/s. It has 96 ROPs versus 24, and it includes 70 RT cores for hardware ray tracing. The RTX 5070 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the B200 has no graphics API support. The RTX 5070 Ti includes display outputs, making it usable in desktop systems. Its higher clock speeds, 2,452 MHz boost versus 1,830 MHz, also favor latency-sensitive workloads.

The RTX 5070 Ti is the only one of the two with measured benchmark data. Its 86th percentile ranking across all GPUs is supported by ten recorded scores. The B200 SXM6's 50th percentile reflects missing data rather than performance. The RTX 5070 Ti competes closely with the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, which leads by 2 percent, and the RX 6800 XT, which trails by 3.1 percent.

Power requirements separate the use cases clearly. The B200 requires a 1,000 W TDP and a 1,400 W suggested power supply, making it suitable for data center installations. The RTX 5070 Ti runs at 300 W with a 700 W suggested power supply, fitting into standard desktop configurations. The B200's SXM module form factor requires specialized server hardware, while the RTX 5070 Ti's dual-slot design fits standard consumer motherboards with PCIe 5.0 x16.

The launch MSRP for the B200 SXM6 is 34,999 USD. The launch MSRP for the RTX 5070 Ti is 749 USD. Both products are listed as Active in production status, meaning they are currently available. The B200 targets AI training, scientific computing, and large-scale data processing. The RTX 5070 Ti targets gaming, content creation, and general-purpose desktop graphics. The data shows no overlap in their intended environments, and the benchmark records confirm the RTX 5070 Ti is the only one of the two with validated graphics performance.