AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs NVIDIA B200 SXM6 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct benchmark comparison between these two parts is limited by the available data. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775, placing it in the 89th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 has no recorded benchmark scores, which places it at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero. This means the only measurable performance data comes from the AMD side.

Looking at the RX 7600M’s nearest rivals, the data shows a tightly packed group. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63,830, which is 0.1% higher than the RX 7600M, representing a negligible delta of -0.1% from the RX 7600M’s perspective. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX scores 63,842, also 0.1% higher, again a -0.1% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63,693, which is 0.1% lower, giving a positive 0.1% delta for the RX 7600M. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 64,212, which is 0.7% higher, resulting in a -0.7% delta for the RX 7600M.

These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating that the RX 7600M performs nearly identically to its closest competitors in OpenCL workloads. The RX 7600M sits essentially in the middle of this cluster, slightly behind the RX 9060 XT LP and CMP 30HX, slightly ahead of the Pro Vega 56, and more noticeably behind the Pro WX 9100, though still by less than a full percent.

For the B200 SXM6, the absence of benchmark scores means there is no head-to-head numerical comparison possible. The database records no wins for either product in direct benchmark matchups, as the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. The winsA and winsB fields both show zero, confirming that no direct comparison tests have been recorded. Any assessment of the B200’s performance must rely on its architectural specifications rather than measured benchmark results.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different market segments and design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is a mobile graphics processor built on the Navi 33 chip, using the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation, specifically the RX 7000M family. The process node is 6 nm, manufactured by TSMC. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a die size of 204 mm², giving a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter.

In contrast, the NVIDIA B200 SXM6 is a server accelerator built on the GB100 chip, using the Blackwell architecture. It belongs to the Server Blackwell generation with the Bxx designation. The process node is 5 nm, also from TSMC. The chip contains 208,000 million transistors on a die size of 1,628 mm², yielding a transistor density of 127.8 million transistors per square millimeter. This represents a substantially larger and denser chip, with roughly 15.6 times as many transistors and a die area that is almost eight times larger.

Memory configurations differ dramatically. The RX 7600M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective. The B200 SXM6 uses 180 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192-bit bus, delivering 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock is also 2000 MHz but with 8 Gbps effective, reflecting the different memory technology.

Compute resources also diverge sharply. The RX 7600M has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It includes 28 ray tracing cores but no tensor cores. Its clock speeds are a base of 1500 MHz, a boost of 2410 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. The B200 SXM6 has 18,944 shading units, 592 texture mapping units, and only 24 ROPs. It includes 592 tensor cores and has no ray tracing cores listed. Its clock speeds are far lower, with a base of 120 MHz and a boost of 1830 MHz.

The pixel and texture rates reflect these differences. The RX 7600M achieves 154.2 GPixel/s and 269.9 GTexel/s. The B200 SXM6 achieves 43.92 GPixel/s and 1,083.4 GTexel/s. The B200 has much lower pixel throughput due to its small ROP count, but far higher texture throughput due to its large number of TMUs.

Floating point performance shows the B200’s compute advantage. The RX 7600M delivers 17.27 TFLOPS for FP32 and 34.55 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The B200 SXM6 delivers 69.34 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with a 1:1 ratio. The B200 produces roughly four times the FP32 throughput and twice the FP16 throughput of the RX 7600M.

Power and physical specifications are equally divergent. The RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W, uses an IGP slot width, requires no power connectors, and has a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. Its display outputs are portable device dependent. The B200 SXM6 has a TDP of 1000 W, uses an SXM Module slot width, and has a suggested PSU of 1400 W. It uses a PCIe 6.0 x16 bus interface and has no display outputs.

API support also differs. The RX 7600M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with version 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The B200 SXM6 has no API support listed for DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan, consistent with its server accelerator role rather than a graphics rendering role.

Release timing shows the RX 7600M launched on January 3, 2023, with a predecessor of Polaris Mobile and no successor. The B200 SXM6 launched on October 31, 2024, with a predecessor of Server Hopper and a successor of Server Rubin. Both are currently marked as active in production.

Where Each One Wins

The data indicates that the RX 7600M wins in scenarios requiring conventional graphics rendering and mobile deployment. Its DirectX 12 Ultimate support with version 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 makes it suitable for gaming and graphics workloads. The 28 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which the B200 lacks entirely. The RX 7600M’s 90 W TDP and IGP form factor allow it to operate in portable devices, whereas the B200 requires a 1400 W power supply and an SXM module slot.

The RX 7600M also wins on pixel throughput. Its 154.2 GPixel/s is substantially higher than the B200’s 43.92 GPixel/s, a difference of roughly 3.5 times. This gives the RX 7600M an advantage in rasterization-heavy workloads where pixel fill rate is the limiting factor. The 64 ROPs on the RX 7600M compared to 24 on the B200 reinforce this strength.

The B200 SXM6 wins in compute-heavy server workloads. Its 69.34 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 is four times the RX 7600M’s FP32 throughput and double its FP16 throughput. The 592 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for AI and machine learning operations, which the RX 7600M cannot offer. The B200’s 180 GB of HBM3e memory with 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth is a massive advantage for large datasets, exceeding the RX 7600M’s 8 GB and 256.0 GB/s by orders of magnitude.

The B200 also wins on texture throughput. Its 1,083.4 GTexel/s is approximately four times the RX 7600M’s 269.9 GTexel/s. The 592 TMUs on the B200 versus 112 on the RX 7600M drive this advantage, benefiting workloads that sample textures or perform gather operations.

The B200’s PCIe 6.0 x16 interface provides double the bandwidth of the RX 7600M’s PCIe 4.0 x16, which matters for data transfer in multi-GPU server configurations. The B200’s 5 nm process node and higher transistor density of 127.8M per mm² indicate a more advanced manufacturing technology compared to the RX 7600M’s 6 nm node and 65.2M per mm² density.

The RX 7600M wins on clock speed. Its boost clock of 2410 MHz and game clock of 2070 MHz are both higher than the B200’s boost clock of 1830 MHz and base clock of 120 MHz. This indicates the RX 7600M can sustain higher per-core frequencies, which benefits latency-sensitive workloads that do not scale perfectly with core count.

The Verdict

The data shows two products designed for fundamentally different purposes. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is a mobile graphics processor with a measured OpenCL benchmark score of 63,775 and an 89th percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals all score within 0.7% of it, confirming that it performs in line with its immediate competitive set. The RX 7600M is appropriate for portable devices requiring DirectX 12 Ultimate support, ray tracing capability, and a 90 W power envelope. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth suit mainstream graphics workloads.

The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 is a server accelerator with no recorded benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking by default. Its specifications indicate a compute-focused design: 69.34 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16, 592 tensor cores, 180 GB of HBM3e memory, and 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. The 1000 W TDP and 1400 W suggested PSU place it firmly in data center infrastructure. The absence of display outputs and graphics APIs confirms that it is not intended for rendering tasks.

For users seeking a mobile GPU for gaming or graphics applications, the RX 7600M is the only viable option from this data. It supports the required graphics APIs, includes ray tracing cores, and has a measured performance level consistent with its rivals. For users seeking a compute accelerator for AI or high-performance computing, the B200 SXM6 offers the necessary resources, though its performance cannot be directly verified from benchmark data.

The RX 7600M’s advantage lies in its measured performance percentile, graphics feature set, and low power requirements. The B200’s advantage lies in its raw computational capacity, memory size, and bandwidth. Neither product competes in the other’s primary market. The RX 7600M has a launch MSRP that is not recorded in the database, while the B200 SXM6 has a launch MSRP of 34,999 USD, though pricing analysis is outside the scope of this data.

The recorded data confirms that the RX 7600M is a competitive mobile GPU within its peer group, while the B200 SXM6 occupies a distinct server segment with no direct benchmark comparisons available.

FAQ

Q: What is the Geekbench OpenCL score for the AMD Radeon RX 7600M?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775.

Q: Does the NVIDIA B200 SXM6 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the NVIDIA B200 SXM6 has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of zero.

Q: How does the RX 7600M compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100?

A: The RX 7600M scores 63,775 while the Pro WX 9100 scores 64,212, giving a delta of -0.7% for the RX 7600M.

Q: What are the memory sizes for both GPUs?

A: The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the B200 SXM6 has 180 GB of HBM3e memory.

Q: Which GPU has tensor cores?

A: The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 has 592 tensor cores. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M does not have any tensor cores listed.

Q: What is the TDP for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W, and the B200 SXM6 has a TDP of 1000 W with a suggested PSU of 1400 W.