GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 890M

CORE STATE Strix Point

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

GPU

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

CORE STATE DG1

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz

TDP 25 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Generation 12.1

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

590

N/A

geekbench_opencl

37,254

14,315

geekbench_vulkan

40,808

N/A

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

979

N/A

passmark_g3d

8,076

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

4,157

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 890M vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Throughout this graphics card showdown, Radeon AMD Radeon 890M establishes its dominance clearly. If you're gaming at 1080p, Radeon AMD Radeon 890M steadily surpasses Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics by significant percentages. The benchmark difference expands notably greater at elevated quality levels. This card executes resource-hungry titles with ease. The technical benefits are apparent.

For real-time ray tracing, Radeon AMD Radeon 890M leaps considerably in front of Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics. Its specialized cores handle heavy shadow calculations considerably more smoothly. Users demanding cutting-edge graphics will definitely consider Radeon AMD Radeon 890M. The RT capability is notable. Modern AAA games increasingly use RT technology.

All things considered, Radeon AMD Radeon 890M provides the superior choice in this matchup. The frame rate leads justify evaluation for buyers putting together a powerful visual build. Even though Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics features its strengths, the benchmark figures undeniably favors Radeon AMD Radeon 890M. Make your decision based on this. This benchmark delta is notable sufficiently to impact.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

890M

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,024

768 -25.0%

Shaders

1,024

768 -25.0%

TMUs

48 -25.0%

ROPs

24 -25.0%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

400 MHz

300 MHz

Boost Clock

2900 MHz

1650 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

2133 MHz 4.3 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

4,096

Memory Type

System Shared

LPDDR4X

Memory Bus

System Shared

128 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

68.26 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

2 MB

1024 KB

L3 Cache

—

16 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

92.80 GPixel/s

39.60 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

185.6 GTexel/s

79.20 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

5.939 TFLOPS

2.534 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

371.2 GFLOPS (1:16)

633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.939 TFLOPS (1:1)

5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Power

TDP

15 W

25 W

TDP (W)

25 +66.7%

Suggested PSU

—

200 W

Power Connectors

None

—

Architecture

RDNA 3.5

Generation 12.1

GPU Name

Strix Point

DG1

Generation

Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)

Xe Graphics

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

34,000 million

—

Die Size

233 mm²

95 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Density

145.9M / mm²

—

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Navi II IGP

Graphics

Successor

—

Alchemist

View Radeon 890M Details View Iris Xe MAX Graphics Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 890M

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 890M vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons