Intel Arc Pro B65 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Arc Pro B65 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The recorded data for the RTX 4070 Ti shows an average benchmark score of 44,795 across ten tests, while the Arc Pro B65 has no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of 0.

The RTX 4070 Ti delivers substantial compute performance in the recorded data. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,024 indicates strong modern gaming workload capability. In Geekbench OpenCL, the card records 176,953, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it reaches 213,808. The PassMark G3D score of 31,624 and GPU compute score of 18,396 reinforce its position as a high-performance part, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

The RTX 4070 Ti sits close to several rivals in the performance hierarchy. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile averages 45,152, which is 0.8% lower than the RTX 4070 Ti's average. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45,384, 1.3% lower. The Intel Arc A730M records 45,592, 1.7% lower. Only the NVIDIA RTX A6000, with 44,075, sits above the RTX 4070 Ti by 1.6%. This clustering indicates the RTX 4070 Ti is positioned in a tight competitive band where small margins separate adjacent cards.

The Arc Pro B65, by contrast, has no benchmark results in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking versus all GPUs is based purely on its specification profile rather than measured performance. Consequently, any direct comparison of benchmark outcomes between these two cards is not possible from the available data. The RTX 4070 Ti demonstrates clear measured superiority in every recorded test category, but the absence of Arc Pro B65 results means those numbers cannot be used to establish a performance gap.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B65 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database shows an average benchmark score of 0 for the Arc Pro B65, with no individual test results listed.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti averages 44,795, which is 0.8% above the RTX 5090 Mobile, 1.3% above the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, 1.6% below the RTX A6000, and 1.7% above the Intel Arc A730M.

Q: What is the RTX 4070 Ti's highest recorded benchmark score?

A: The highest individual score is 213,808 in Geekbench Vulkan, followed by 176,953 in Geekbench OpenCL.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: The Arc Pro B65 uses 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 608.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has 7,680 shading units, while the Arc Pro B65 has 2,560 shading units.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The Arc Pro B65 is listed as Active, while the RTX 4070 Ti is listed as End-of-life.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear split between these two products. The RTX 4070 Ti is a measured performer with an 84th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 44,795. It delivers strong results across DX12, OpenCL, Vulkan, and PassMark suites. The Arc Pro B65 has no benchmark data, so its 50th percentile ranking is provisional and based on specifications only.

For users who require proven, quantified performance, the RTX 4070 Ti is the only choice supported by measurements. Its FP32 throughput of 40.09 TFLOPS, 60 RT cores, and 240 tensor cores provide a substantial compute foundation. The Arc Pro B65 offers 12.29 TFLOPS FP32, 20 RT cores, and no tensor core count listed, indicating a lower theoretical ceiling.

However, the Arc Pro B65 presents a different profile. It carries 32 GB of memory versus 12 GB, a 256-bit bus versus 192-bit, and 608.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 504.2 GB/s. It also uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RTX 4070 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The Arc card is actively produced, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti is end-of-life. The RTX 4070 Ti had a launch MSRP of 799 USD, a figure that applies only to its original release.

The verdict depends on whether measured performance or capacity and longevity matter more. The RTX 4070 Ti wins on every recorded benchmark and offers a much higher compute rate. The Arc Pro B65 wins on memory size, memory bandwidth, bus interface generation, and production status. Neither card dominates across all categories, but the RTX 4070 Ti is the only one with data proving its performance level.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every core specification. The RTX 4070 Ti uses the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The Arc Pro B65 uses the BMG-G21 chip with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. Transistor density is 121.8M per mm² for the RTX 4070 Ti versus 72.1M per mm² for the Arc Pro B65.

Clock speeds diverge significantly. The Arc Pro B65 runs at 2400 MHz base and boost. The RTX 4070 Ti runs at 2310 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ: the Arc uses 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective, while the RTX 4070 Ti uses 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective.

Compute resources show the largest gap. The RTX 4070 Ti has 7,680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, 80 ROPs, 60 RT cores, and 240 tensor cores. The Arc Pro B65 has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 RT cores, with no tensor core count provided. Pixel rates are 208.8 GPixel/s for the RTX 4070 Ti and 192.0 GPixel/s for the Arc. Texture rates are 626.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Power and connectivity also differ. The RTX 4070 Ti has a TDP of 285 W and uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 600 W. The Arc Pro B65 has a TDP of 200 W, uses a 1x 8-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU. Both are dual-slot cards. The RTX 4070 Ti measures 285 mm long, 112 mm high, and 42 mm wide. The Arc Pro B65 has no dimensions recorded.

Display outputs are another point of divergence. The Arc Pro B65 provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1. The RTX 4070 Ti provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The Arc Pro B65 is built on Intel's Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series generation. The RTX 4070 Ti uses NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture from the GeForce 40-series. Both are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the underlying designs are entirely different.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The Arc Pro B65 uses 32 GB of GDDR6 across a 256-bit interface. The RTX 4070 Ti uses 12 GB of GDDR6X across a 192-bit interface. The Arc card achieves 608.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is 20.6% higher than the RTX 4070 Ti's 504.2 GB/s. The larger memory capacity and wider bus suggest the Arc Pro B65 is oriented toward memory-intensive workloads such as large model inference or high-resolution rendering.

Shader architecture also differs. The Arc Pro B65's 2,560 shading units deliver 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The RTX 4070 Ti's 7,680 shading units deliver 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.09 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The RTX 4070 Ti's FP16 throughput matches its FP32, which is a notable advantage for mixed-precision compute.

Ray tracing and tensor capabilities are asymmetric. The Arc Pro B65 has 20 RT cores and no tensor core listing. The RTX 4070 Ti has 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. The tensor cores provide dedicated AI acceleration that the Arc Pro B65 does not document in the database.

The RTX 4070 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Arc Pro B65 uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The newer PCIe generation on the Arc card provides double the theoretical interface bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti is end-of-life with a predecessor in GeForce 30 and a successor in GeForce 50. The Arc Pro B65 is active with no predecessor or successor recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti wins in every measured performance category. Its 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 is more than three times the Arc Pro B65's 12.29 TFLOPS. Its 60 RT cores triple the Arc's 20. Its 240 tensor cores enable AI workloads that the Arc Pro B65 cannot match with its unlisted tensor count. The RTX 4070 Ti's 626.4 GTexel/s texture rate and 208.8 GPixel/s pixel rate both exceed the Arc Pro B65's 384.0 GTexel/s and 192.0 GPixel/s.

The Arc Pro B65 wins on memory capacity and bandwidth. Its 32 GB is nearly triple the RTX 4070 Ti's 12 GB. Its 608.0 GB/s bandwidth exceeds the RTX 4070 Ti's 504.2 GB/s. For workloads that require holding large datasets on the GPU, the Arc Pro B65 provides a clear advantage. Its 256-bit bus supports that capacity more effectively than the RTX 4070 Ti's 192-bit bus.

The Arc Pro B65 also wins on interface modernity. PCIe 5.0 x16 vs PCIe 4.0 x16 matters for systems with PCIe 5.0 capable platforms. The Arc card's 200 W TDP is lower than the RTX 4070 Ti's 285 W, and its 550 W suggested PSU is below the RTX 4070 Ti's 600 W. The Arc Pro B65's 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support newer display standards than the RTX 4070 Ti's HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a combination.

Production status favors the Arc Pro B65. It is listed as Active, while the RTX 4070 Ti is End-of-life. For buyers seeking a currently manufactured product, the Arc Pro B65 remains available. The RTX 4070 Ti, with its launch MSRP of 799 USD, is a legacy part.

The RTX 4070 Ti wins on raw compute, ray tracing, tensor performance, and every benchmark in the database. The Arc Pro B65 wins on memory size, memory bandwidth, power efficiency, PCIe generation, display outputs, and production availability. The choice follows the workload: compute-heavy applications favor the RTX 4070 Ti, while memory-capacity and interface-driven tasks favor the Arc Pro B65.