Intel Arc Pro B65 vs Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile Comparison

Intel Arc Pro B65 and Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile occupy opposite ends of the graphics spectrum, yet both sit in the database with identical percentile rankings against all GPUs at 50. The Arc Pro B65 is a discrete workstation-class accelerator built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, while the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is an integrated processor graphics solution for Raptor Lake laptops. The recorded data shows no head-to-head benchmark scores for this pairing, so the analysis relies on the specification differences and architectural characteristics documented in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct benchmark scores for the Intel Arc Pro B65 versus the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile. Neither entry has recorded average benchmark scores, and the wins counters for both sides stand at zero. This absence of measured performance data means the comparison must be derived from the hardware specifications that define each product’s capability envelope.

The most decisive gap appears in shading throughput. The Arc Pro B65 delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile produces 307.2 GFLOPS. That places the discrete card roughly 40 times ahead in raw single-precision floating-point work. In FP16 performance, the Arc Pro B65 reaches 24.58 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, versus 614.4 GFLOPS for the integrated solution, again a 40-fold difference. These figures translate directly into pixel and texture throughput. The Arc Pro B65 sustains 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, while the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile manages 4.800 GPixel/s and 9.600 GTexel/s. The fill-rate advantage for the discrete card is 40x in pixel output and exactly 40x in texture output.

Memory bandwidth amplifies the compute disparity. The Arc Pro B65 carries 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 608.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile relies on system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent, which in practice is far lower than dedicated GDDR6. Clock speeds also differ substantially. The Arc Pro B65 runs at a flat 2400 MHz for both base and boost, whereas the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile idles at 300 MHz and boosts to 1200 MHz. The integrated part’s boost clock is exactly half of the Arc Pro B65’s sustained clock.

Shader resources reinforce the performance stratification. The Arc Pro B65 fields 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. Those counts represent 20x, 20x, and 20x differences respectively. The Arc Pro B65 also includes 20 ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the integrated UHD Graphics 710 Mobile, which lists no RT cores. Texture and pixel rates scale directly from these unit counts, confirming that the discrete card’s 40x fill-rate advantage stems from both higher clocks and far larger execution resources.

Power consumption reflects the performance gulf. The Arc Pro B65 draws 200 W with a suggested 550 W power supply, while the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile consumes just 15 W and fits as an IGP with no power connector requirements. The 13.3x power draw difference is modest compared to the 40x compute difference, indicating the discrete card delivers substantially higher performance per watt in raw throughput terms.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the Intel Arc Pro B65 in FP32 compute than the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile?

A: The Arc Pro B65 delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile produces 307.2 GFLOPS. That represents approximately a 40x advantage for the discrete card.

Q: Does the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile support ray tracing?

A: No. The database lists no ray tracing cores for the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile. The Arc Pro B65 includes 20 dedicated RT cores as part of its Xe2-HPG architecture.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The Arc Pro B65 uses 32 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 608.0 GB/s bandwidth. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM.

Q: Which GPU has higher clock speeds?

A: The Arc Pro B65 runs at 2400 MHz for both base and boost clocks. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has a 300 MHz base clock and a 1200 MHz boost clock, so the discrete card’s minimum clock is double the integrated part’s maximum boost.

Q: What are the API level differences between the two?

A: The Arc Pro B65 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The discrete card has a higher DirectX feature level.

Q: How do the pixel fill rates compare?

A: The Arc Pro B65 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s, while the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile reaches 4.800 GPixel/s. The discrete card is exactly 40 times faster in pixel throughput.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B65 and Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile stem from entirely different architectural lineages. The Arc Pro B65 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture on the BMG-G21 chip, belonging to the Battlemage Pro Series generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 19,600 million transistors packed into a 272 mm² die. That yields a transistor density of 72.1M per square millimeter. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses the Generation 12.2 architecture on a Raptor Lake chip, belonging to the HD Graphics-M (Raptor Lake) generation. It is built on Intel’s 10 nm process. The database lists no transistor count, die size, or density for the integrated part, reflecting its role as a small block within a larger processor die.

Execution resource allocation differs sharply. The Arc Pro B65 configures 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 RT cores. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile configures 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs with no RT cores. The discrete card’s architecture also supports a 256-bit memory interface, whereas the integrated GPU connects via a Ring Bus to system memory. The Arc Pro B65 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface for host communication, while the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has no discrete bus interface listed, relying on the processor’s internal fabric.

Feature support shows both similarities and differences. Both GPUs support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The DirectX support diverges: the Arc Pro B65 reaches 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile tops out at DirectX 12 (12_1). Display output capabilities also differ. The Arc Pro B65 provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1 connectors, while the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile’s display outputs are described as portable device dependent, meaning they vary by laptop implementation.

The Arc Pro B65’s memory subsystem is self-contained with 32 GB of GDDR6 at 2375 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective and 608.0 GB/s bandwidth. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has no dedicated memory; its memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as system shared, with bandwidth dependent on the host platform’s memory configuration. This architectural separation means the discrete card’s performance is consistent across systems, while the integrated GPU’s performance scales with laptop memory speed and configuration.

Clock behavior reflects the design intent. The Arc Pro B65 maintains a constant 2400 MHz clock for both base and boost, suggesting a fixed operating point suitable for sustained workstation workloads. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has a 300 MHz base clock that boosts to 1200 MHz, indicating aggressive power management for battery-constrained mobile environments. The 15 W TDP for the integrated part versus 200 W for the discrete card underscores this design philosophy.

The Verdict

The data positions the Intel Arc Pro B65 as a high-throughput compute and rendering device, while the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile serves as a low-power integrated solution for basic display and light acceleration tasks. The Arc Pro B65’s 12.29 TFLOPS FP32, 608.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 20 RT cores place it in a performance class that handles demanding professional workloads. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile’s 307.2 GFLOPS FP32 and system shared memory cap its capabilities at fundamental desktop composition, video playback, and lightly accelerated applications.

For users with workloads that stress GPU compute, the Arc Pro B65 delivers 40x the FP32 throughput, 40x the pixel fill rate, and 40x the texture rate of the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile. The discrete card’s 32 GB GDDR6 capacity and 256-bit bus provide the memory headroom for large datasets and high-resolution textures, while the integrated part depends entirely on host system memory. The Arc Pro B65 also brings hardware ray tracing through its 20 RT cores, a capability the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile lacks entirely.

The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile claims its own advantages in the database. It consumes 15 W versus 200 W, a 13.3x reduction in power draw. It requires no additional power connectors, fits as an IGP with no slot width, and needs no suggested power supply rating. The Arc Pro B65 demands a dual-slot footprint, a single 8-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested power supply. For systems where power efficiency and minimal footprint are paramount, the integrated solution is the only viable choice.

The release timeline gives the Arc Pro B65 a 2026-03-31 launch date, while the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile shipped on 2023-01-03. The integrated part has a documented successor, Arc Graphics-M, whereas the Arc Pro B65 lists no successor. Both products remain in active production status per the database.

The verdict follows the data. The Arc Pro B65 suits scenarios requiring maximum compute throughput, dedicated memory bandwidth, and ray tracing support. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile suits scenarios requiring minimal power consumption, no discrete card installation, and basic graphics capability. The 40x performance ratios across compute and fill rates make the discrete card the clear choice for performance-oriented tasks, while the 15 W power envelope makes the integrated GPU the clear choice for battery-powered portability. Neither product fills the other’s role adequately based on the recorded specifications.

Specification Differences

The database records substantial differences across nearly every specification field between the Intel Arc Pro B65 and the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile.

Chip and Architecture: The Arc Pro B65 uses the BMG-G21 chip with Xe2-HPG architecture from the Battlemage Pro Series. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses the Raptor Lake chip with Generation 12.2 architecture from the HD Graphics-M (Raptor Lake) generation.

Process Node: The Arc Pro B65 is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Transistors and Die Size: The Arc Pro B65 contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die with 72.1M transistors per mm². The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has no transistor count, die size, or density listed.

Clocks: The Arc Pro B65 runs at 2400 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile runs at 300 MHz base and 1200 MHz boost. The Arc Pro B65’s memory clock is 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), while the UHD Graphics 710 Mobile’s memory clock is system shared.

Memory: The Arc Pro B65 has 32 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 608.0 GB/s bandwidth. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has system shared memory, system shared type, system shared bus width, and system dependent bandwidth.

Shading Units: The Arc Pro B65 has 2560 shading units. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has 128 shading units.

TMUs: The Arc Pro B65 has 160 texture mapping units. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has 8.

ROPs: The Arc Pro B65 has 80 render output units. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has 4.

Ray Tracing Cores: The Arc Pro B65 has 20 RT cores. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has none.

Pixel Rate: The Arc Pro B65 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile achieves 4.800 GPixel/s.

Texture Rate: The Arc Pro B65 achieves 384.0 GTexel/s. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile achieves 9.600 GTexel/s.

FP32 Performance: The Arc Pro B65 delivers 12.29 TFLOPS. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile delivers 307.2 GFLOPS.

FP16 Performance: The Arc Pro B65 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1). The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile delivers 614.4 GFLOPS (2:1).

TDP: The Arc Pro B65 has a 200 W TDP. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has a 15 W TDP.

Slot Width: The Arc Pro B65 is dual-slot. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is an IGP.

Power Connectors: The Arc Pro B65 uses one 8-pin connector. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has none.

Suggested PSU: The Arc Pro B65 suggests a 550 W power supply. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has no suggested PSU.

Bus Interface: The Arc Pro B65 uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses a Ring Bus.

Display Outputs: The Arc Pro B65 provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile’s outputs are portable device dependent.

DirectX: The Arc Pro B65 supports 12 Ultimate (12_2). The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile supports 12 (12_1).

OpenGL: Both support OpenGL 4.6.

Vulkan: Both support Vulkan 1.4.

Release Date: The Arc Pro B65 launched on 2026-03-31. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile launched on 2023-01-03.

Successor: The Arc Pro B65 has no successor listed. The UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has Arc Graphics-M as its successor.

Production Status: Both are listed as active.

Percentile: Both sit at the 50th percentile against all GPUs in the database, despite their vast specification differences. This parity reflects the database’s current lack of benchmark scores for either product, leaving both ranked at the median by default.