Intel Arc Pro B60 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB Comparison

Intel Arc Pro B60 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB occupy adjacent tiers in the benchmark database, with the NVIDIA card holding a narrow edge in the single shared test while the Intel card offers a dramatically different memory and feature profile. The data presents a classic split between raw compute density and capacity-oriented design, where the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB wins the one direct benchmark comparison but the Arc Pro B60 counters with triple the memory and a newer display interface standard.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results show a clear, if limited, division of labor. In the only head-to-head test available — 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) — the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB wins outright, scoring 2913 against the Intel Arc Pro B60’s 2646, a delta of 9.2% in NVIDIA’s favor. This makes the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB the stronger choice for pure rasterization workloads that scale with shading unit count and FP32 throughput, where it holds a substantial 22.06 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS advantage.

The Intel Arc Pro B60, however, wins on every metric related to memory capacity and bandwidth. With 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivering 456.0 GB/s, it more than triples the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB’s 8 GB allocation and exceeds its 288.0 GB/s bandwidth by 58.3%. This makes the Arc Pro B60 the logical pick for workloads that are memory-bound rather than compute-bound — large dataset processing, high-resolution texture streaming, or AI inference models that require substantial VRAM residency. The Intel card also leads in pixel fill rate (192.0 GPixel/s versus 121.7 GPixel/s) and texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s versus 344.8 GTexel/s), suggesting advantages in certain fill-limited scenarios despite the raw FP32 deficit.

FAQ

Q: Which card is faster in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2913, which is 9.2% higher than the Intel Arc Pro B60’s 2646. This is the only benchmark where both cards have recorded scores.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 features 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s. The Intel card offers 3x the capacity and 58.3% more bandwidth.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 has an average benchmark score of 3182 across multiple tests (including PassMark G3D at 14580 and GPU Compute at 7029), while the NVIDIA card’s average is 2913 based solely on the 3DMark Steel Nomad result.

Q: Which card has higher raw compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB delivers 22.06 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.06 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio), versus the Intel Arc Pro B60’s 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The NVIDIA card has 79.5% higher FP32 throughput.

Q: What display outputs does each card provide?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Intel card supports the newer DisplayPort standard.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 is listed as Active production, released on September 4, 2025, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB is marked End-of-life, released on May 17, 2023.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single direct comparison in the database is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, and it tells a straightforward story. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2913 points, beating the Intel Arc Pro B60’s 2646 by 9.2%. This margin is consistent with the cards’ raw compute specifications — the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB has 4352 shading units versus 2560 for the Arc Pro B60, and its FP32 throughput of 22.06 TFLOPS is nearly double the Intel card’s 12.29 TFLOPS.

However, the Intel card’s advantage in memory and fill-rate metrics suggests where it might close the gap in real-world scenarios not captured by this single test. The Arc Pro B60’s 456.0 GB/s bandwidth and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate could prove decisive in workloads that saturate memory or require heavy overdraw. The delta of 9.2% is notable but not overwhelming, and the Intel card’s higher average benchmark score (3182 versus 2913) reflects its performance across a broader test suite, including PassMark DX9 (179), DX10 (61), DX11 (122), and DX12 (76) tests. The NVIDIA card has no recorded scores in these legacy DirectX tests, making a complete cross-benchmark comparison impossible from the available data.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every core specification category. The Intel Arc Pro B60 uses the BMG-G21 chip with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die (72.1M/mm² density), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB uses AD106 with 22,900 million transistors on a smaller 188 mm² die (121.8M/mm² density). Clock speeds favor NVIDIA: 2310 MHz base and 2535 MHz boost versus Intel’s 2000 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ, with Intel at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) and NVIDIA at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem is where the biggest divergence appears. The Intel card offers 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, while NVIDIA offers 8 GB on a 128-bit bus. This drives the bandwidth difference: 456.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s. The shading unit count heavily favors NVIDIA (4352 versus 2560), as do RT cores (34 versus 20) and tensor cores (136 versus none listed for Intel). However, Intel leads in TMUs (160 versus 136) and ROPs (80 versus 48). Power requirements also differ: the Intel card has a 200 W TDP with a 550 W suggested PSU and 1x 8-pin connector, while NVIDIA’s card has a 160 W TDP with a 450 W suggested PSU and 1x 16-pin connector. The bus interface differs as well — Intel uses PCIe 5.0 x8, NVIDIA uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Physical dimensions vary significantly: the Intel card is 167 mm long and 69 mm high, while the NVIDIA card is 240 mm long and 111 mm high.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap is fundamental. Intel’s Arc Pro B60 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture from the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation, while NVIDIA’s RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB uses Ada Lovelace from the GeForce 40 generation. Both are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the transistor densities tell different design stories — NVIDIA packs 121.8M transistors per mm² versus Intel’s 72.1M/mm², indicating a more compact, dense design that achieves higher clocks and FP32 throughput.

Ray tracing hardware differs in count and presumably capability: NVIDIA includes 34 RT cores and 136 tensor cores, while Intel lists 20 RT cores and no tensor core count. The FP16 processing approach also diverges — Intel achieves 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 via a 2:1 ratio from its FP32 units, while NVIDIA offers 22.06 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, suggesting different compute priorities. Display output technology separates them further: Intel provides DisplayPort 2.1, while NVIDIA is limited to DisplayPort 1.4a and HDMI 2.1. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is equal. The production status also differs, with Intel’s card active and NVIDIA’s end-of-life, and the release dates are over two years apart (September 2025 versus May 2023).

The Verdict

The data supports a performance pick for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB in compute-bound scenarios. Its 9.2% win in 3DMark Steel Nomad, combined with 79.5% higher FP32 throughput and 70% more shading units, makes it the clear choice for gaming or rendering workloads that rely on raw shader execution. The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB also offers superior transistor density and higher clock speeds, indicating a more mature, efficient design.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the capacity pick. Its 24 GB memory allocation, 58.3% higher bandwidth, and newer DisplayPort 2.1 outputs position it for professional workloads where VRAM limits are the bottleneck — large 3D scenes, machine learning model training, or multi-display setups. The Intel card’s higher pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s versus 121.7 GPixel/s) and texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s versus 344.8 GTexel/s) suggest it can handle fill-heavy tasks effectively, even if its raw FP32 is lower. The longer-term production status and newer release date also favor Intel for longevity. The choice ultimately hinges on whether the workload is compute-bound (NVIDIA) or memory-bound (Intel), with the 9.2% benchmark gap being small enough that capacity advantages could easily flip real-world results.