Intel Arc Pro B60 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB Comparison

The Intel Arc Pro B60 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB are both positioned at the same launch MSRP of 499 USD, yet the benchmark data reveals starkly different performance profiles. In the single available head-to-head benchmark, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB holds a decisive edge, scoring 9% higher than the Arc Pro B60. This result, combined with the broader specification sheet, paints a clear picture: the NVIDIA card is the raw performance leader in this pairing, while the Intel card counters with a substantial memory capacity advantage and a more professional-oriented feature set.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison available is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which measures modern DirectX 12 gaming and graphics workload performance. In this test, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2907, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 2646. This represents a 9% advantage for the NVIDIA card, a meaningful gap that will translate into higher frame rates in most GPU-bound scenarios. The delta is consistent with the architectural differences between the two cards, particularly the NVIDIA card's higher shading unit count and peak FP32 throughput.

Beyond this single head-to-head result, the average benchmark scores across all available tests reinforce the NVIDIA card's lead. The RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB posts an average benchmark score of 2907, while the Arc Pro B60 averages 3182. It is important to note that the Arc Pro B60's average is skewed by a much broader set of benchmark results, including legacy DirectX 9 and DirectX 10 tests where it performs relatively well. For instance, the Arc Pro B60 scores 179 in Passmark DirectX 9 and 61 in Passmark DirectX 10, whereas the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has no corresponding scores in the data pack. Conversely, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB's only other data point is its 3DMark Steel Nomad score, which is its sole benchmark result.

The percentile rankings further contextualize these scores. The Arc Pro B60 sits in the 20th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB sits in the 18th percentile. This suggests that, despite the RTX card winning the head-to-head, both cards are positioned in a similar mid-range performance tier relative to the entire GPU market. The nearest rival data for the Arc Pro B60 includes the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (0.6% higher average score), the GeForce GT 640 (0.9% lower), and the GeForce 920M (3.2% lower), indicating the Arc Pro B60's average is tightly clustered with these older, lower-tier cards. In contrast, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB's nearest rivals are the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (0.1% lower), the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (0.2% lower), and the RTX 4010 (0.5% higher), showing it competes directly with more modern, similarly-performing cards.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures, which explains their divergent benchmark results. The Intel Arc Pro B60 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture on the BMG-G21 chip, part of the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on the AD106 chip, part of the GeForce 40 series. Both are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the transistor counts and die sizes differ significantly. The NVIDIA chip packs 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The Intel chip contains 19,600 million transistors on a larger 272 mm² die, resulting in a lower density of 72.1M per mm².

The compute configuration is where the NVIDIA card's performance advantage becomes clear. The RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB features 4352 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It also includes 34 ray tracing cores and 136 tensor cores. The Arc Pro B60, by contrast, has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, along with 20 ray tracing cores and no listed tensor cores. The NVIDIA card's higher shading unit count and FP32 throughput of 22.06 TFLOPS versus the Intel card's 12.29 TFLOPS directly explain its 9% lead in the 3DMark test. The Intel card does counter with higher pixel and texture rates (192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s) compared to the NVIDIA card's 121.7 GPixel/s and 344.8 GTexel/s, but these metrics do not translate into a win in the available benchmark.

Memory architecture is another major differentiator. The Arc Pro B60 offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB offers 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card's 8 GB capacity advantage and 168 GB/s bandwidth advantage are significant for workloads that exceed 16 GB of VRAM, such as large dataset rendering or multi-model AI inference, but they do not offset the NVIDIA card's raw compute advantage in the tested scenario.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is the faster card. It wins the only available head-to-head benchmark by 9%, and its architecture provides a clear compute advantage with 4352 shading units and 22.06 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. Buyers prioritizing maximum frame rates in DirectX 12 workloads should choose the NVIDIA card. The data shows no single benchmark where the Intel Arc Pro B60 outperforms the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB.

However, the Intel Arc Pro B60 is not without a rationale. Its 24 GB of memory, compared to the NVIDIA card's 16 GB, is a substantial capacity lead that could be decisive for users who know their workloads require more than 16 GB of VRAM. The Arc Pro B60 also has a higher memory bandwidth (456.0 GB/s vs 288.0 GB/s) and more ROPs (80 vs 48), which could benefit specific rasterization-heavy tasks. Its PCIe 5.0 x8 interface is newer than the NVIDIA card's PCIe 4.0 x8, and it offers four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs versus the NVIDIA card's single HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Users with a specific need for those features might prefer the Intel card, but on pure performance, the NVIDIA card wins.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 has an average benchmark score of 3182, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has an average score of 2907. However, the Intel card's average includes multiple legacy benchmark tests (DirectX 9, 10, 11, 12, G2D, G3D, and compute), while the NVIDIA card's average is based solely on its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score.

Q: What is the performance difference in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2907, which is 9% higher than the Intel Arc Pro B60's score of 2646. The NVIDIA card is the winner in this benchmark.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Which card has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 has a memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s, which is significantly higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB's 288.0 GB/s.

Q: Are both cards the same price?

A: Yes, both the Intel Arc Pro B60 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB have a launch MSRP of 499 USD.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has 4352 shading units, compared to the Intel Arc Pro B60's 2560 shading units. This contributes to the NVIDIA card's higher FP32 performance of 22.06 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB wins in raw compute performance. Its 4352 shading units, 136 tensor cores, and 22.06 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput give it a clear edge in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, where it leads by 9%. The data indicates that for any DirectX 12 gaming or general-purpose GPU compute task where the VRAM requirement fits within 16 GB, the NVIDIA card is the superior choice. Its higher boost clock (2535 MHz vs 2400 MHz) and lower TDP (165 W vs 200 W) also suggest better power efficiency per frame, though no power consumption benchmarks are provided in the data pack.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 wins on memory capacity and bandwidth. Its 24 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are both significantly higher than the NVIDIA card's 16 GB and 288.0 GB/s. This makes the Intel card the better option for workloads that are memory-bound and can utilize more than 16 GB of VRAM, such as large-scale 3D rendering, scientific simulations, or AI model training with large batch sizes. The Intel card also has more ROPs (80 vs 48) and a higher pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s vs 121.7 GPixel/s), which could provide advantages in fill-rate-limited scenarios. Its PCIe 5.0 x8 interface and four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs are also more modern and flexible than the NVIDIA card's PCIe 4.0 x8 and mixed HDMI/DisplayPort setup.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B60 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | BMG-G21 | AD106 |

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | Ada Lovelace |

| Transistors | 19,600 million | 22,900 million |

| Die Size | 272 mm² | 188 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 72.1M / mm² | 121.8M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 2000 MHz | 2310 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2535 MHz |

| Memory Size | 24 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 456.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 4352 |

| TMUs | 160 | 136 |

| ROPs | 80 | 48 |

| RT Cores | 20 | 34 |

| Tensor Cores | Not listed | 136 |

| FP32 Performance | 12.29 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) | 22.06 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 200 W | 165 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 550 W | 450 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-09-04 | 2023-05-17 |