Intel Arc Pro B60 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Comparison

The Intel Arc Pro B60 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti represent two vastly different eras of GPU design, and the benchmark data reflects a complete generational shift. The Arc Pro B60, built on Intel’s Xe2-HPG architecture, posts an average benchmark score of 3182, while the GTX 750 Ti, based on NVIDIA’s Maxwell architecture, averages 2953. This places the Intel card at the 20th percentile of all GPUs, with the GTX 750 Ti just behind at the 19th percentile. The head-to-head results are unambiguous: the Arc Pro B60 wins all eight shared tests, with margins ranging from 44.5% to 2161.5%. The data shows a decisive performance hierarchy, though the GTX 750 Ti’s legacy as a low-power pioneer remains historically notable.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic disparity appears in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. Here, the Arc Pro B60 scores 2646 against the GTX 750 Ti’s 117, a delta of 2161.5%. This is not a marginal improvement but a complete redefinition of what the hardware can achieve under modern DirectX 12 workloads. The older card’s score is effectively a placeholder, while the Intel part demonstrates contemporary rendering capability.

In legacy DirectX tests, the gap narrows but remains substantial. PassMark DirectX 9 shows the Arc Pro B60 at 179 versus 60 for the GTX 750 Ti, a 198.3% lead. DirectX 10 results are closer in relative terms: 61 versus 17, a 258.8% advantage. DirectX 11 sees the Intel card score 122 against 26, a 369.2% margin, while DirectX 12 shows 76 versus 18, a 322.2% lead. These results indicate that the Arc Pro B60 does not merely excel in modern APIs; it also crushes the older card in the very API generations where the GTX 750 Ti was designed to compete.

The compute-oriented PassMark GPU Compute test reinforces the pattern. The Intel card scores 7029, while the GTX 750 Ti manages only 1744, a 303% difference. This aligns with the raw specification gap: the Arc Pro B60 delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the GTX 750 Ti provides 1,388.8 GFLOPS (approximately 1.39 TFLOPS). The compute advantage is nearly ninefold, and the benchmark confirms this scaling.

The overall gaming and graphics workload metric, PassMark G3D, shows the Intel card at 14580 versus 3903, a 273.6% lead. Even in the 2D test (PassMark G2D), which typically favors less demanding tasks, the Arc Pro B60 wins with 763 against 528, a 44.5% advantage. The smallest margin is still a significant win, indicating that the Intel card holds the edge across every measured dimension. The GTX 750 Ti’s only consolation is that it has a Geekbench Metal score of 5182, a test the Arc Pro B60 does not share, so no direct comparison exists there.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins the most benchmark tests head-to-head?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 wins all eight shared benchmarks, with zero wins for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti. The margins range from 44.5% in PassMark G2D to 2161.5% in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: How do the two compare on DirectX 9 performance?

A: The Arc Pro B60 scores 179 in PassMark DirectX 9, while the GTX 750 Ti scores 60. That is a 198.3% lead for the Intel card, showing it is even faster in legacy API titles.

Q: What is the memory capacity and bandwidth difference?

A: The Arc Pro B60 has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GTX 750 Ti has 2 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 86.40 GB/s. The Intel card offers 12 times the capacity and over five times the bandwidth.

Q: Does the GTX 750 Ti support any modern API features that the Arc Pro B60 lacks?

A: No. The Arc Pro B60 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GTX 750 Ti supports DirectX 12 (11_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning the Intel card has a higher DirectX feature level.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare to their nearest rivals?

A: The Arc Pro B60’s average score of 3182 is 0.6% above the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163) and 3.5% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER (3075). The GTX 750 Ti’s average of 2953 is 1% above the NVIDIA Quadro P600 (2923) and 1.4% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913).

Q: What are the release dates and production statuses?

A: The Arc Pro B60 was released on September 4, 2025, and is listed as Active. The GTX 750 Ti was released on February 17, 2014, and is End-of-life. The Intel card’s launch MSRP is 499 USD; the GTX 750 Ti’s launch MSRP is 149 USD.

The Verdict

From the data, the Intel Arc Pro B60 is the clear performance winner in every shared test. Its average benchmark score of 3182 is 7.8% higher than the GTX 750 Ti’s 2953, but the head-to-head deltas are far more telling. In the most demanding modern workload (3DMark Steel Nomad DX12), the Intel card is over 21 times faster. In compute, it is roughly four times faster. The GTX 750 Ti cannot compete in any measured category, and its percentile ranking (19th) is only one point below the Intel card (20th), which suggests that while both sit low in the overall GPU distribution, the Intel part is still significantly stronger within that bracket.

Who should pick the GTX 750 Ti? Only a user constrained by its single-slot form factor, 60 W TDP, and lack of power connectors could justify it, but even then the performance gap is prohibitive. The data shows no scenario where the GTX 750 Ti wins, so for any benchmark-driven decision, the Arc Pro B60 is the only rational choice. The Intel card’s 24 GB memory, 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 make it suitable for modern workloads, while the GTX 750 Ti’s 2 GB and 86.40 GB/s are insufficient for contemporary demands.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every fundamental specification. The Arc Pro B60 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the GTX 750 Ti uses a 28 nm process, also at TSMC. Transistor counts are 19,600 million versus 1,870 million, and die sizes are 272 mm² versus 148 mm², yielding transistor densities of 72.1M per mm² and 12.6M per mm², respectively. The Intel card has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs; the GTX 750 Ti has 640 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The Arc Pro B60 includes 20 ray tracing cores, while the GTX 750 Ti has none.

Clock speeds differ: the Arc Pro B60 runs at a base of 2000 MHz and boost of 2400 MHz, while the GTX 750 Ti runs at 1020 MHz base and 1085 MHz boost. Memory clocks are 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) for the Intel card versus 1350 MHz (5.4 Gbps effective) for the NVIDIA card. The Arc Pro B60 has a 200 W TDP, is dual-slot, uses a single 8-pin connector, and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. The GTX 750 Ti has a 60 W TDP, is single-slot, uses no power connectors, and requires a 250 W suggested PSU. The bus interfaces are PCIe 5.0 x8 for the Intel card and PCIe 3.0 x16 for the NVIDIA card. Display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 versus 2x DVI and 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a. The Arc Pro B60 measures 167 mm long, 69 mm high, and 40 mm wide; the GTX 750 Ti is 145 mm long with unspecified height and width.

Architecture Differences

Architecturally, the Intel Arc Pro B60 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture on the BMG-G21 chip, part of the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti uses the Maxwell architecture on the GM107 chip, from the GeForce 700 generation. The Intel card has 20 ray tracing cores, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the GTX 750 Ti has no such hardware. The Arc Pro B60 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (feature level 12_2), while the GTX 750 Ti only reaches DirectX 12 (feature level 11_0). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, but the Intel card’s newer architecture allows for higher feature sets.

The memory subsystems are fundamentally different: 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus versus 2 GB GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus. The Intel card’s FP16 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), while the GTX 750 Ti has no listed FP16 capability. The Arc Pro B60’s pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s; the GTX 750 Ti’s are 17.36 GPixel/s and 43.40 GTexel/s. The transistor density difference (72.1M vs 12.6M per mm²) reflects the process node leap from 28 nm to 5 nm. The GTX 750 Ti has a predecessor (GeForce 600) and successor (GeForce 900), while the Arc Pro B60 has no listed predecessor or successor, indicating it is a standalone professional part.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro B60 wins in every benchmark category where the two overlap. In modern DirectX 12 workloads, it is over 21 times faster, making it the only viable option for current games or 3D applications. In compute tasks, the 303% lead in PassMark GPU Compute shows it can handle GPGPU workloads, while the GTX 750 Ti’s 1744 score limits it to basic tasks. The Intel card’s 24 GB memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are suited for large datasets or high-resolution textures; the GTX 750 Ti’s 2 GB and 86.40 GB/s are only adequate for older or low-detail content.

The GTX 750 Ti’s only advantages are physical: it is single-slot, has no power connector requirement, and draws 60 W versus 200 W. For a system with a 250 W PSU and no spare power cables, the GTX 750 Ti is the only choice from this pairing. Its 145 mm length is shorter than the Intel card’s 167 mm, which could help in compact cases. However, these are practical constraints, not performance wins. The benchmark data shows zero test victories for the GTX 750 Ti, so any selection of that card must be based on power or space limitations, not on measured performance. For all other uses, the Arc Pro B60’s 8-0 head-to-head record is the definitive answer.