Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no completed head-to-head benchmark runs for the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual against the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Both entries show zero benchmark submissions, zero wins for either side, and an identical percentile placement of 50 against all GPUs. The average benchmark score for both cards is 0, meaning no measured performance data exists to compare directly at this time.

What the data does provide is a set of theoretical compute ceilings derived from each card's architecture. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO lists an FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS, which is exactly double the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's 12.29 TFLOPS. In FP16 workloads with a 2:1 ratio, the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS against the Arc Pro B60 Dual's 24.58 TFLOPS. This raw arithmetic suggests the LX PRO has a 100% advantage in pure shader math, assuming both architectures execute at their rated specifications without thermal or power throttling.

However, the Intel card counters in memory bandwidth. The Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 456.0 GB/s from its 24 GB GDDR6 pool at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), while the LX PRO provides 432.0 GB/s from the same 24 GB capacity at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel part holds a 5.6% bandwidth lead, which matters for memory-bound workloads such as large texture streaming or data-intensive compute kernels. Pixel rate and texture rate are identical on paper: both cards list 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, so rasterization throughput at the output stage appears matched.

The LX PRO also doubles the shading unit count, 6144 versus 2560, and has more texture mapping units (192 vs 160) and render output units (96 vs 80). Those additional units align with the higher TFLOPS figure. Without actual benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm whether the LX PRO's wider shader array translates into real-world scaling, but the specification gap is substantial.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural lineages. Intel's Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series generation. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with a TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. Both are fabricated by TSMC, but at different nodes: Intel uses a 5 nm process, while Lisuan Tech uses 6 nm. Intel lists 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, giving a density of 72.1M transistors per mm². The LX PRO's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, and no density figure is recorded.

Clock behavior differs significantly. The Intel card has explicit base and boost clocks: 2000 MHz base, 2400 MHz boost. The LX PRO lists no base or boost clock at all, only its memory clock. This means the database cannot verify the LX PRO's operating frequencies, and the FP32 calculation of 24.58 TFLOPS relies on an unstated core clock that must be substantially higher than Intel's 2400 MHz boost to achieve that figure with 6144 shading units. The absence of clock data introduces uncertainty about sustained performance under load.

Ray tracing hardware is present only on the Intel side. The Arc Pro B60 Dual lists 20 dedicated RT cores; the LX PRO has no RT core entry in the database. For DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads that leverage ray tracing, this is a structural difference favoring Intel. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the Vulkan versions differ: Intel supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. That version gap may affect compatibility with newer Vulkan extensions.

The memory subsystems share capacity and type, both 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, but the Intel card runs its memory faster at 2375 MHz versus 2250 MHz, yielding the bandwidth delta noted earlier. Power delivery and board design diverge sharply as well. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual draws 400 W and requires an 800 W suggested power supply. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO draws 225 W and asks for a 550 W PSU. Both use a single 16-pin power connector and occupy a dual-slot form factor. Physical dimensions differ: Intel measures 300 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, while the LX PRO is shorter at 248 mm, taller at 118 mm, and thicker at 48 mm.

Bus interface also separates the pair. Intel uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while Lisuan Tech uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The older x16 link offers more lanes but lower per-lane bandwidth; the newer x8 link has higher per-lane throughput. For most workloads, both provide ample bandwidth to the host, but the difference may show in heavy CPU-to-GPU transfer scenarios. Display outputs differ: Intel provides four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 connectors, while the LX PRO provides four standard DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. The DisplayPort 2.1 standard on the Intel card supports higher bandwidth for future high-resolution monitors.

Release dates separate the products by roughly six months. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual launched on September 4, 2025, with a listed launch MSRP of 1,199 USD. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a release date of March 16, 2026, and no launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded specifications, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS doubles Intel's 12.29 TFLOPS, and its FP16 rate of 49.15 TFLOPS doubles Intel's 24.58 TFLOPS. Workloads that scale with shader count, such as general-purpose GPU compute, physics simulation, or large matrix operations, should favor the LX PRO if the missing clock data holds up. The LX PRO also has more TMUs (192 vs 160) and ROPs (96 vs 80), which could benefit texture-heavy rendering and fill-rate-bound scenes.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins in areas where its feature set and memory speed matter more than raw shader count. The 20 RT cores give it a hardware path for ray-traced effects that the LX PRO cannot match at all. The higher memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s gives Intel a 5.6% edge in bandwidth-sensitive tasks. The DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support newer display standards than the LX PRO's DisplayPort 1.4a. The PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, while narrower, uses a newer generation with higher per-lane bandwidth, which may reduce latency in certain data transfer patterns. The lower 5 nm process node also suggests denser transistor packing, though the LX PRO's transistor count is unknown.

Power efficiency clearly favors the Lisuan Tech card. The LX PRO delivers double the FP32 throughput while drawing 225 W, compared to Intel's 400 W. That translates to roughly 109 TFLOPS per kilowatt for the LX PRO versus 31 TFLOPS per kilowatt for the Intel card, based on the recorded figures. The LX PRO also requires a lower suggested PSU, 550 W versus 800 W, which affects system build flexibility. The Intel card's higher power draw may be justified by its RT cores and faster memory, but the arithmetic shows the LX PRO is far more efficient in raw compute per watt.

Physical footprint favors Intel in length and width but not height. The Intel card is longer at 300 mm but narrower at 40 mm and shorter at 110 mm. The LX PRO is shorter at 248 mm but taller at 118 mm and thicker at 48 mm. Users with tight case clearances will need to check both dimensions against their chassis.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, exactly double the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's 12.29 TFLOPS. The LX PRO also doubles the FP16 rate at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: Do both cards have the same memory configuration?

A: Both cards use 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The Intel card runs at 2375 MHz with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the LX PRO runs at 2250 MHz with 432.0 GB/s. Intel holds a 5.6% bandwidth advantage.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have ray tracing hardware?

A: No. The database shows no RT core entry for the LX PRO. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual lists 20 dedicated RT cores.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a TDP of 400 W with an 800 W suggested PSU. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W with a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which card supports newer display outputs?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual provides four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO provides four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors.

Q: What is the release date for each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual launched on September 4, 2025. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a release date of March 16, 2026.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | BMG-G21 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Battlemage (Pro Series) | 7G100 |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 19,600 million | Unknown |

| Die size | 272 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor density | 72.1M / mm² | Not recorded |

| Base clock | 2000 MHz | Not recorded |

| Boost clock | 2400 MHz | Not recorded |

| Memory clock | 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| Memory bandwidth | 456.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 2560 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 160 | 192 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT cores | 20 | Not recorded |

| FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 400 W | 225 W |

| Suggested PSU | 800 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | 300 mm x 110 mm x 40 mm | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Release date | 2025-09-04 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 1,199 USD | Not recorded |

The Verdict

The recorded data splits the decision cleanly along workload type. For compute-heavy tasks that rely on raw shader throughput, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO offers double the FP32 and FP16 performance of the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, with fewer watts consumed and a lower PSU requirement. The 6144 shading units versus 2560 represent a fundamental scaling advantage that no other specification on the Intel card can offset in pure math-bound scenarios.

For graphics workloads that use ray tracing, the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is the only option with dedicated RT hardware. The 20 RT cores provide a hardware path that the LX PRO lacks entirely. The Intel card also carries faster memory, newer display outputs, and a newer Vulkan revision. These features matter for professional rendering pipelines that rely on ray-traced effects or for systems driving monitors that require DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth.

The lack of any actual benchmark scores means neither card has proven performance in the database. The theoretical specifications favor the LX PRO for compute and efficiency, and the Intel card for feature completeness and memory bandwidth. Users who prioritize raw TFLOPS and power efficiency should select the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Users who need ray tracing, newer display connectivity, or a smaller physical footprint should select the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, accepting its higher 400 W power draw and larger 300 mm length. The database records no head-to-head wins for either side, so these conclusions rest entirely on the specification sheets rather than measured results.