Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data contains a single measurable result for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the NVIDIA card posts a score of 6269.5. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no benchmark entries in the database, so a direct numerical comparison between the two cannot be established from the recorded measurements.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's average benchmark score of 6270 places it at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals show the competitive landscape around this score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 matches the average score exactly at 6270, a delta of 0 percent. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, which is 0.2 percent higher. The AMD FirePro W600 trails at 6223, a 0.8 percent deficit. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 sits at 6327, 0.9 percent above the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER.

Without recorded scores for the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, the head-to-head comparison rests entirely on architectural and specification data rather than measured test results. The database shows zero benchmark wins for either card in direct comparison, which reflects the absence of paired test data rather than any performance equivalence.

Architecture Differences

The two cards derive from fundamentally different design philosophies. Intel builds the Arc Pro B60 Dual on the BMG-G21 chip using the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series generation. NVIDIA counters with the GB203 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture from the GeForce 50-series.

Both GPUs use TSMC's 5 nm process node, but the transistor counts diverge sharply. Intel integrates 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a density of 72.1 million transistors per square millimeter. NVIDIA packs 45,600 million transistors onto a 378 mm² die, achieving 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip carries more than double the transistor count on a die that is roughly 39 percent larger.

The memory subsystems reflect different priorities. The Intel card offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, producing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card uses 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, nearly doubling bandwidth to 896.0 GB/s. The memory clock speeds also differ: Intel runs at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), while NVIDIA runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The GDDR7 standard delivers the higher effective data rate despite a lower physical clock.

Compute resources show a substantial NVIDIA advantage in raw count. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER carries 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual features 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 RT cores, with no tensor core count recorded. The NVIDIA card delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 43.94 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio. Intel manages 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio.

Clock speeds favor NVIDIA on the base frequency: 2295 MHz versus Intel's 2000 MHz. The boost clocks sit closer, with NVIDIA at 2452 MHz and Intel at 2400 MHz. Pixel and texture rates follow the resource counts, with NVIDIA reaching 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s, while Intel records 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s.

Power characteristics differ as well. The Intel card lists a TDP of 400 W with a suggested PSU of 800 W. The NVIDIA card lists a 350 W TDP with no suggested PSU in the database. Both use a single 16-pin power connector and occupy a dual-slot form factor.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER demonstrates clear advantages in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 figure of 43.94 TFLOPS stands 3.6 times higher than the Intel card's 12.29 TFLOPS. The FP16 performance follows the same pattern: 43.94 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, a 1.8-fold margin. Texture rate shows NVIDIA at 686.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, a 1.8-fold advantage. Memory bandwidth doubles: 896.0 GB/s versus 456.0 GB/s.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins on memory capacity with 24 GB versus 16 GB. This gives it a 50 percent capacity advantage for workloads that require large working sets. The Intel card also lists a higher TDP at 400 W versus 350 W, which may indicate greater power delivery headroom, though the database records no efficiency measurements.

The pixel rate comparison shows a narrower gap: 235.4 GPixel/s for NVIDIA versus 192.0 GPixel/s for Intel, a 1.2-fold difference. This suggests fill-rate-bound scenarios favor NVIDIA less decisively than compute-bound scenarios.

The display output configuration differs meaningfully. Intel provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. NVIDIA provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The Intel configuration suits multi-display setups with uniform connector types, while the NVIDIA card includes HDMI for direct consumer display compatibility.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA card in FP32 compute?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 12.29 TFLOPS. This represents a 3.6-fold advantage for NVIDIA.

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: NVIDIA leads with 896.0 GB/s from 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus. Intel provides 456.0 GB/s from 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: Intel offers 24 GB, which is 8 GB more than NVIDIA's 16 GB. The Intel card provides a 50 percent capacity advantage.

Q: Does either card have tensor cores?

A: The NVIDIA card includes 280 tensor cores. The Intel card lists no tensor core count in the database.

Q: What are the transistor density figures?

A: NVIDIA achieves 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter on its 378 mm² die. Intel achieves 72.1 million per square millimeter on a 272 mm² die.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: It matches the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 exactly at 6270 average score. It trails the Quadro K620 by 0.2 percent, leads the FirePro W600 by 0.8 percent, and trails the Radeon R7 M350 by 0.9 percent.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | BMG-G21 | GB203 |

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Transistors | 19,600 million | 45,600 million |

| Die size | 272 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Transistor density | 72.1M / mm² | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base clock | 2000 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2400 MHz | 2452 MHz |

| Memory clock | 2375 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 24 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 456.0 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 2560 | 8960 |

| TMUs | 160 | 280 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT cores | 20 | 70 |

| Tensor cores | Not recorded | 280 |

| Pixel rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 384.0 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 400 W | 350 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | 300 x 110 x 40 mm | 304 x 137 x 48 mm |

| Release date | 2025-09-04 | 2025-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | 1,199 USD | 749 USD |

| Percentile vs all GPUs | 50 | 36 |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 6270 |

The Verdict

The data indicates two cards with clearly different design targets. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER dominates in compute throughput, memory bandwidth, and feature count. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 280 tensor cores position it for compute-heavy and AI-accelerated workloads. The recorded benchmark score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad confirms real-world DX12 performance in line with its nearest rivals.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual offers 24 GB of memory, a 50 percent capacity advantage, and four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. Its lower compute figures and absence of tensor cores limit its applicability in the same high-throughput scenarios. The 400 W TDP exceeds the NVIDIA card's 350 W figure, yet delivers substantially lower FP32 and texture rates.

The benchmark database contains no recorded scores for the Intel card, so users seeking measured performance comparisons must rely on the specification-level differences presented here. The NVIDIA card's 36th percentile ranking with a 6270 average score places it in a specific performance tier. The Intel card's 50th percentile figure carries no supporting benchmark data.

Buyers prioritizing compute performance, memory bandwidth, and tensor core acceleration should select the NVIDIA card. Buyers requiring maximum memory capacity or uniform mini-DisplayPort connectivity should consider the Intel card. The NVIDIA launch MSRP of 749 USD sits below the Intel launch MSRP of 1,199 USD, though the database records no pricing analysis beyond those figures.