Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

The Verdict

The benchmark database records a decisive outcome: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds an average benchmark score of 31,087 and ranks in the 76th percentile among all GPUs, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual shows a 50th percentile standing with no recorded benchmark scores. The data indicates that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the stronger performer across every measurable metric, delivering 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus the Intel card's 12.29 TFLOPS, and offering 672.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth against 456.0 GB/s. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, however, presents a distinct profile: it carries 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, and requires a 400 W power draw with an 800 W suggested PSU, compared to the NVIDIA card's 285 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU. The recorded data suggests the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER suits users prioritizing raw performance and established software compatibility, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual, with its larger frame buffer and newer PCIe generation, may appeal to professionals needing maximum memory capacity for large datasets. The NVIDIA card is marked as end-of-life with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, whereas the Intel card remains an active production product, indicating different market positioning: the former is a mature, high-performance option, the latter a current-generation workstation entry.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER employs the AD103 chip based on Ada Lovelace architecture from the GeForce 40 generation, also on a 5 nm TSMC process, but with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, achieving a higher density of 121.1 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip packs more than double the transistors into a larger area, which correlates with its significantly higher compute throughput.

Core configurations differ substantially. The Intel card features 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 80 render output units, and 20 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA card offers 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 66 RT cores, and 264 tensor cores. This gives the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER roughly 3.3 times the shading units and 3.3 times the RT cores, explaining its 3.6 times higher FP32 throughput. Clock speeds also favor NVIDIA: the base clock sits at 2,340 MHz and boost at 2,610 MHz, while Intel runs at 2,000 MHz base and 2,400 MHz boost. The Intel part compensates with a 24 GB memory pool using GDDR6 across a 192-bit bus, whereas NVIDIA uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus; the wider bus and faster memory type give NVIDIA 672.3 GB/s bandwidth, a 47% advantage over the Intel card's 456.0 GB/s. The PCIe interface differs as well: Intel uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while NVIDIA uses PCIe 4.0 x16, though the practical bandwidth implications depend on workload. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and both use a single 16-pin power connector, but the Intel card is dual-slot while NVIDIA is triple-slot.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory. Intel's advantage is 8 GB, but NVIDIA's memory runs at 21 Gbps effective versus Intel's 19 Gbps, and NVIDIA's 256-bit bus yields 672.3 GB/s bandwidth versus 456.0 GB/s for Intel.

Q: How do the compute performances compare?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is 3.6 times higher than the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's 12.29 TFLOPS. In FP16, NVIDIA maintains 44.10 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while Intel achieves 24.58 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning NVIDIA still leads but by a smaller margin of about 1.8 times.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a 400 W TDP and requires an 800 W suggested PSU, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 285 W TDP and a 600 W suggested PSU. The NVIDIA card draws 115 W less and can run on a system with 200 W lower PSU capacity.

Q: Which GPU has better ray tracing hardware?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti SUPER includes 66 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 20. The NVIDIA card also includes 264 tensor cores, which Intel does not list, suggesting NVIDIA has a substantial advantage in RT and AI-accelerated workloads.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual measures 300 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, and occupies a dual-slot form factor. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is larger at 310 mm long, 140 mm high, and 61 mm wide, requiring a triple-slot footprint.

Q: What are the display output options?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Intel card supports the newer DisplayPort 2.1 standard, while NVIDIA uses the older DisplayPort 1.4a.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ on nearly every specification field. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip with Xe2-HPG architecture from the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation, while the NVIDIA card uses AD103 with Ada Lovelace from GeForce 40. Both use a 5 nm TSMC process, but NVIDIA has 45,900 million transistors versus Intel's 19,600 million, and a larger die at 379 mm² versus 272 mm². Transistor density is 121.1M per mm² for NVIDIA and 72.1M per mm² for Intel. Base clock favors NVIDIA at 2,340 MHz versus 2,000 MHz, and boost clock favors NVIDIA at 2,610 MHz versus 2,400 MHz. Memory differs completely: Intel has 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective); NVIDIA has 16 GB GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). Shading units are 2,560 for Intel versus 8,448 for NVIDIA; TMUs are 160 versus 264; ROPs are 80 versus 96; RT cores are 20 versus 66; NVIDIA adds 264 tensor cores while Intel lists none. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s for Intel versus 250.6 GPixel/s for NVIDIA; texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 689.0 GTexel/s; FP32 is 12.29 TFLOPS versus 44.10 TFLOPS; FP16 is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 44.10 TFLOPS. TDP is 400 W for Intel versus 285 W for NVIDIA; suggested PSU is 800 W versus 600 W. Slot width is dual-slot for Intel versus triple-slot for NVIDIA. PCIe interface is 5.0 x8 for Intel versus 4.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 for Intel versus 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a for NVIDIA. Dimensions: Intel is 300 x 110 x 40 mm; NVIDIA is 310 x 140 x 61 mm. Production status differs: Intel is Active with a release date of 2025-09-04, while NVIDIA is End-of-life with a release date of 2024-01-23 and a successor in GeForce 50.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data shows no recorded wins for the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, as it has no benchmark scores in the database. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, however, has ten recorded benchmark results that establish its performance baseline. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the NVIDIA card scores 5,569. In Geekbench OpenCL, it achieves 199,267 points, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it reaches 53,683. PassMark tests show a G3D score of 31,811, a GPU compute score of 18,372, a G2D score of 1,225, and legacy DirectX scores of 360 for DX9, 278 for DX11, 181 for DX10, and 119 for DX12. These results place the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in the 76th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 31,087. The nearest rivals in the database confirm its competitive position: the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 scores 31,206 with a delta of -0.4%, the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q scores 31,220 with a delta of -0.4%, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 31,532 with a delta of -1.4%, and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX scores 31,676 with a delta of -1.9%. These figures indicate the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sits within a tight performance cluster, trailing the TITAN RTX by less than 2% while outperforming the Quadro M5000 by 0.4%. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, with no benchmark data and a 50th percentile ranking, cannot be directly compared on these tests, but its specification sheet suggests it operates in a much lower performance tier given its 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 compute versus NVIDIA's 44.10 TFLOPS.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data shows the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins decisively on raw compute performance. Its 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 output is 3.6 times higher than the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, and its 250.6 GPixel/s pixel rate and 689.0 GTexel/s texture rate outpace Intel's 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card also leads in memory bandwidth at 672.3 GB/s versus 456.0 GB/s, and its 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware that Intel lacks entirely on the tensor side. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is more power-efficient in terms of performance per watt, delivering higher throughput at 285 W compared to Intel's 400 W, and it requires a smaller 600 W PSU versus 800 W. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins on memory capacity with 24 GB versus 16 GB, which matters for workloads that exceed 16 GB of frame buffer, and it offers the newer PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, potentially providing higher bandwidth per lane for data transfer. Intel also provides DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, a newer standard than NVIDIA's DisplayPort 1.4a, and its dual-slot design is more compact than NVIDIA's triple-slot footprint. The Intel card is an active product, while NVIDIA is end-of-life, meaning Intel has ongoing availability. For compute-heavy tasks like gaming, rendering, or AI inference, the data clearly favors NVIDIA. For large-memory professional workloads, such as massive 3D scenes or high-resolution texture sets, the Intel card's 24 GB capacity could be the deciding factor despite its lower throughput. The absence of benchmark scores for Intel, however, means its real-world performance remains unverified in the database, while NVIDIA's 76th percentile ranking and strong scores across ten tests provide a reliable baseline.