Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual and the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350. Neither GPU has any entries in the benchmark score field, and both share the same percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs. Their average benchmark scores are both recorded as zero, meaning the comparative performance data is absent from the database. Without direct measurement data, the analysis must rely on the architectural specifications and feature sets provided in the database.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 presents substantially higher raw compute figures. Its FP32 throughput is 44.44 TFLOPS, which is 3.6 times the 12.29 TFLOPS of the Arc Pro B60 Dual. In FP16 work, the Max 1350 delivers 44.44 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual reaches 24.58 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The Max 1350 also leads in texture rate at 1,388.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s for the Arc Pro B60 Dual, a 3.6x advantage.

The Arc Pro B60 Dual counters in areas tied to display and rasterization. Its pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, while the Max 1350 shows 0 MPixel/s because it has no ROPs and no display outputs. The Arc Pro B60 Dual is the only one of the two that can drive monitors, offering 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 connections. The Max 1350 is an OAM Module with no outputs, making it unsuitable for any direct display workload.

Memory bandwidth strongly favors the Max 1350. Its 96 GB of HBM2e across an 8192-bit bus delivers 2.46 TB/s, which is 5.4 times the 456.0 GB/s of the Arc Pro B60 Dual. The Arc Pro B60 Dual uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The memory capacity difference is 72 GB in favor of the Max 1350.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The Arc Pro B60 Dual runs at a base of 2000 MHz and boosts to 2400 MHz. The Max 1350 has a base clock of 750 MHz and a boost of 1550 MHz. The Arc Pro B60 Dual's boost clock is 850 MHz higher, and its base clock is 1250 MHz higher. The Arc Pro B60 Dual's memory clock is 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), while the Max 1350's memory clock is 1200 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective).

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design lineages. The Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series generation. The Max 1350 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip on the Generation 12.5 architecture, part of the Data Center GPU (Ponte Vecchio) generation. The process nodes differ: the Arc Pro B60 Dual is fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC, while the Max 1350 uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Transistor counts diverge sharply. The Max 1350 packs 100,000 million transistors on a 1280 mm² die, giving a density of 78.1M transistors per mm². The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, for a density of 72.1M per mm². The Max 1350's die is 4.7 times larger, and it holds 5.1 times more transistors. Despite the smaller process node, the Arc Pro B60 Dual has a slightly lower transistor density.

Core configurations are fundamentally different in scale. The Max 1350 has 14,336 shading units, 896 texture mapping units, and 112 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 20 ray tracing cores. The Max 1350 has 5.6 times more shading units, 5.6 times more TMUs, and 5.6 times more ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 80 ROPs, while the Max 1350 has zero ROPs, reflecting its lack of rasterization output hardware.

Memory architecture is another point of separation. The Max 1350 uses HBM2e with an 8192-bit bus, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual uses GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus. The Max 1350 offers 96 GB of memory, four times the Arc Pro B60 Dual's 24 GB. The Max 1350's bandwidth of 2.46 TB/s is 5.4 times higher. Neither GPU lists tensor cores in the database.

API support differs in key areas. The Arc Pro B60 Dual supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Max 1350 supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, but Vulkan support is not recorded. The Arc Pro B60 Dual is a dual-slot card measuring 300 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, using a single 16-pin power connector. The Max 1350 is an OAM Module with no listed dimensions or power connectors. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has a suggested PSU of 800 W, while the Max 1350 suggests 850 W. Power draw is 400 W for the Arc Pro B60 Dual and 450 W for the Max 1350.

The bus interface differs as well. The Arc Pro B60 Dual uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while the Max 1350 uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The Max 1350 was released on 2023-01-09, and the Arc Pro B60 Dual on 2025-09-04. The Max 1350 lists a successor, the H3C Graphics, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual has no predecessor or successor in the database. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD; the Max 1350 has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 wins decisively in compute throughput and memory capacity. Its FP32 performance of 44.44 TFLOPS is 3.6 times the Arc Pro B60 Dual's 12.29 TFLOPS. Its FP16 performance of 44.44 TFLOPS at 1:1 ratio is 1.8 times the Arc Pro B60 Dual's 24.58 TFLOPS at 2:1 ratio. The Max 1350's 96 GB of HBM2e memory and 2.46 TB/s bandwidth make it suited for large data sets and memory-bound workloads. Its 112 ray tracing cores and 14,336 shading units support massive parallel workloads. The Max 1350 also has 5.6 times more TMUs, delivering a texture rate of 1,388.8 GTexel/s. Its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides double the lane width of the Arc Pro B60 Dual's x8 connection.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins in display and rasterization capabilities. It has 80 ROPs and a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, while the Max 1350 has no ROPs and a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s. The Arc Pro B60 Dual provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, enabling direct monitor connection, while the Max 1350 has no display outputs. The Arc Pro B60 Dual also has higher clock speeds: a 2400 MHz boost and 2000 MHz base, compared to 1550 MHz and 750 MHz for the Max 1350. Its memory clock of 2375 MHz is nearly double the Max 1350's 1200 MHz. The Arc Pro B60 Dual supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, while the Max 1350 only lists DirectX 12 (12_1) and no Vulkan support.

The Arc Pro B60 Dual is a physically smaller card at 300 mm length, 40 mm width, and dual-slot thickness, while the Max 1350 is an OAM Module with no listed dimensions. The Arc Pro B60 Dual uses 400 W, 50 W less than the Max 1350's 450 W, and suggests an 800 W PSU versus 850 W for the Max 1350.

The Verdict

The data points to two different usage profiles. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 is the compute-oriented part: 3.6 times higher FP32, 1.8 times higher FP16, 5.4 times more memory bandwidth, and four times the memory capacity. Its zero ROP count and lack of display outputs confirm it is not designed for rasterization or direct video output. The Max 1350 is built for data center scale compute, where 44.44 TFLOPS and 96 GB of memory are the relevant metrics. Its 112 ray tracing cores and 14,336 shading units give it a 5.6x core advantage over the Arc Pro B60 Dual across the board.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is the only one of the two that can output to a display. Its 80 ROPs, 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs make it a functional graphics card for workstation use. Its 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP16 are still substantial, and its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory is enough for many professional workloads. The Arc Pro B60 Dual operates at higher clocks, with a 2400 MHz boost versus 1550 MHz for the Max 1350, and supports a newer DirectX feature level (12_2 versus 12_1) plus Vulkan 1.4. Its 400 W power draw is lower, and its dual-slot form factor fits standard workstation slots.

The recorded data shows no benchmarks, so the selection must be made on specifications alone. For rendering or any workload requiring a display output, the Arc Pro B60 Dual is the only viable option. For headless compute with large memory footprints, the Max 1350 is the stronger choice. Both GPUs hold the same 50th percentile rank in the database, reflecting the absence of measured performance data rather than equivalence. The Max 1350 is the older part, released in 2023, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual arrived in 2025.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has 44.44 TFLOPS of FP32, which is 3.6 times the 12.29 TFLOPS of the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual.

Q: Can the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 connect to a display?

A: No. The Max 1350 has no display outputs and is an OAM Module with 0 MPixel/s pixel rate. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Max 1350 has 96 GB of HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus with 2.46 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Arc Pro B60 Dual has a TDP of 400 W and suggests an 800 W PSU. The Max 1350 has a TDP of 450 W and suggests an 850 W PSU.

Q: Which GPU supports more advanced DirectX features?

A: The Arc Pro B60 Dual supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Max 1350 supports DirectX 12 (12_1). The Arc Pro B60 Dual also supports Vulkan 1.4, while Vulkan support is not recorded for the Max 1350.

Q: What are the clock speeds of the two GPUs?

A: The Arc Pro B60 Dual runs at 2000 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, with memory at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The Max 1350 runs at 750 MHz base and 1550 MHz boost, with memory at 1200 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective).