Intel Arc Pro B390 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q Comparison

Intel Arc Pro B390 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q

The comparison between the Intel Arc Pro B390 and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q is not a contest of equals; it is a study in extremes. The database records a single benchmark score for the NVIDIA part, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 11088, while the Intel Arc Pro B390 has no recorded benchmark entries. The NVIDIA card sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 11088. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q with an identical average score of 11088, the AMD Radeon RX 550 at 11075 (0.1% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER at 11047 (0.4% slower), and the AMD FirePro W4300 at 11225 (1.2% faster). The Intel part also holds a 50th percentile ranking, but with no benchmark scores, the percentile is derived from specifications alone, not measured performance. The data cannot produce a direct head-to-head comparison because the Intel Arc Pro B390 has no recorded performance results.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only benchmark result in the database for either product belongs to the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 11088 places it in a tightly packed cluster of GPUs. The closest rival, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q, matches the score exactly at 11088, showing a 0% difference. The AMD Radeon RX 550 trails by just 13 points with 11075, a 0.1% gap. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 11047, which is 41 points lower, a 0.4% deficit. Interestingly, the AMD FirePro W4300 actually outperforms the RTX PRO 6000D in this test, scoring 11225, which is 137 points higher, a 1.2% advantage for the older AMD workstation card. These deltas are small, but they reveal that the RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q does not dominate its immediate database neighbors. It is competitive, but not decisively ahead.

For the Intel Arc Pro B390, the database lists zero benchmark entries. The wins counter shows 0 for Intel and 0 for NVIDIA in head-to-head tests, confirming that no direct comparison exists. The Intel part’s performance profile is entirely speculative from the recorded specifications. The data shows no scenario where the Intel Arc Pro B390 achieves a measured victory over the NVIDIA card, nor does it show any measured loss, because no test was run. The absence of data is itself a finding: the Intel product, as an integrated graphics processor (IGP), has no standalone benchmark presence in this database. The NVIDIA card, by contrast, has a concrete, recorded result that anchors its position in the database hierarchy.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. It is built on a 3 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q uses the GB202 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference is significant: 3 nm for Intel versus 5 nm for NVIDIA, though the database does not provide transistor counts or die sizes for the Intel part. For NVIDIA, the database lists 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 122.9 million per square millimeter.

The compute resources diverge sharply. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, 24 raster operation units, and 12 ray tracing cores. It has no dedicated tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q has 24064 shading units, 752 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 188 ray tracing cores, and 752 tensor cores. The NVIDIA card’s shading unit count is roughly 15.7 times higher than Intel’s. Texture rate for Intel is recorded as 120.0 GTexel/s, while NVIDIA reaches 1,720.6 GTexel/s. Pixel rate for Intel is 60.00 GPixel/s, versus NVIDIA’s 439.3 GPixel/s. FP32 compute for Intel is 7.680 TFLOPS, while NVIDIA delivers 110.1 TFLOPS. FP16 performance also differs: Intel provides 15.36 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while NVIDIA offers 110.1 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, meaning NVIDIA does not halve its throughput for FP16 work.

Memory architecture is another chasm. The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses system shared memory, with the type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. The NVIDIA card has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA memory clock is recorded as 1750 MHz, with 28 Gbps effective data rate. The Intel part’s memory clock is also system shared. The power envelopes are equally divergent: Intel’s TDP is recorded as 80 W, while NVIDIA’s is 300 W. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors, while NVIDIA requires a single 16-pin connector and the database suggests a 700 W power supply. The bus interface for Intel is IGP, meaning it does not use a separate slot, while NVIDIA uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The NVIDIA card is dual-slot with dimensions of 267 mm length, 111 mm height, and 40 mm width; the Intel part has no dimensions because it is integrated into a processor package.

The Verdict

The data supports only one conclusion: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q is the only one of the two with measured performance. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 11088, while closely matched by several rivals, is a real number from a real test. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has no benchmark results, so any claim about its performance is unsupported by the database. For users who require validated performance data, the NVIDIA card is the only option with evidence. The Intel part’s integrated nature, 80 W TDP, and system shared memory suggest it targets a different class of system, likely low-power mobile or compact designs, but the database provides no measurements to confirm any capability. The NVIDIA card, with 96 GB of GDDR7 memory, 110.1 TFLOPS FP32, and 188 ray tracing cores, is positioned for high-end workstation tasks, but even its recorded benchmark shows it only marginally edges out an AMD Radeon RX 550 and a GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in the database’s specific test. The verdict from the data is that the NVIDIA part is the sole contender with demonstrated results, and the Intel part remains an unmeasured entity.

Specification Differences

The two products differ in nearly every recorded specification. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q has a base clock of 1590 MHz and a boost clock of 2288 MHz. Intel’s memory is system shared, while NVIDIA has 96 GB of GDDR7. Intel’s bus width is system shared, NVIDIA’s is 512 bit. Intel’s bandwidth is system dependent, NVIDIA’s is 1.79 TB/s. Shading units: Intel 1536, NVIDIA 24064. TMUs: Intel 48, NVIDIA 752. ROPs: Intel 24, NVIDIA 192. Ray tracing cores: Intel 12, NVIDIA 188. Tensor cores: Intel none listed, NVIDIA 752. Pixel rate: Intel 60.00 GPixel/s, NVIDIA 439.3 GPixel/s. Texture rate: Intel 120.0 GTexel/s, NVIDIA 1,720.6 GTexel/s. FP32: Intel 7.680 TFLOPS, NVIDIA 110.1 TFLOPS. FP16: Intel 15.36 TFLOPS (2:1), NVIDIA 110.1 TFLOPS (1:1). TDP: Intel 80 W, NVIDIA 300 W. Slot width: Intel IGP, NVIDIA dual-slot. Power connectors: Intel none, NVIDIA 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU: Intel none listed, NVIDIA 700 W. Bus interface: Intel IGP, NVIDIA PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs: Intel portable device dependent, NVIDIA 4x DisplayPort 2.1b. Process node: Intel 3 nm, NVIDIA 5 nm. Foundry: Intel, TSMC. Transistors: Intel unknown, NVIDIA 92,200 million. Die size: Intel unknown, NVIDIA 750 mm². Release date: Intel 2026-01-26, NVIDIA 2025-03-17. The NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 8,565 USD. The Intel part has no recorded launch MSRP. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

FAQ

Q: What is the only benchmark score recorded for either GPU?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 11088. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: How does the NVIDIA card compare to its nearest rival in the database?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q matches it exactly at 11088, a 0% difference. The AMD Radeon RX 550 scores 11075, which is 0.1% lower. The AMD FirePro W4300 scores 11225, which is 1.2% higher.

Q: What are the memory capacities of the two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses system shared memory, so its capacity is system dependent. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q delivers 110.1 TFLOPS, while the Intel Arc Pro B390 provides 7.680 TFLOPS.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B390 has a TDP of 80 W and requires no power connectors. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q has a TDP of 300 W and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 700 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000D Blackwell Max-Q wins on every measured and specified performance metric in the database. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 11088 is the only recorded performance result, so it wins the only benchmark that exists. It wins on raw compute: 110.1 TFLOPS FP32 versus 7.680 TFLOPS for Intel. It wins on memory: 96 GB of GDDR7 with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth versus system shared memory. It wins on texture rate at 1,720.6 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s. It wins on pixel rate at 439.3 GPixel/s versus 60.00 GPixel/s. It wins on ray tracing cores at 188 versus 12. It wins on tensor cores at 752 versus none listed for Intel. It wins on shading units at 24064 versus 1536. It wins on TMUs at 752 versus 48. It wins on ROPs at 192 versus 24. The NVIDIA card also offers dedicated display outputs with 4x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the Intel part has portable device dependent outputs. For any workload that relies on FP32 compute, ray tracing, tensor operations, or high-bandwidth memory, the NVIDIA card is the clear winner in the database’s recorded data.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 wins on power efficiency in terms of raw TDP, at 80 W versus 300 W for NVIDIA. It wins on integration, as an IGP with no power connectors and no slot width, meaning it fits into a processor package without a dedicated card. It wins on process node, using 3 nm versus NVIDIA’s 5 nm, though no transistor or die size data confirms practical benefits. It also has a higher boost clock at 2500 MHz versus NVIDIA’s 2288 MHz, though this does not translate to higher throughput given the far smaller core count. The Intel part’s release date of 2026-01-26 is later than NVIDIA’s 2025-03-17, but later release does not imply better performance in the absence of benchmark data. For systems where power draw must stay below 100 W and where a discrete card is not an option, the Intel Arc Pro B390 has a specification-based advantage. For any task that requires measured performance, the NVIDIA card is the only one with evidence of capability. The database shows no scenario where the Intel part achieves a benchmark win, because no benchmark was recorded.