Intel Arc Pro A60M vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro A60M and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 occupy different positions in the performance spectrum, and the recorded data shows a clear division of strengths. The LX 7G100 is the dominant force in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 output of 24.58 TFLOPS is more than 4.6 times the Arc Pro A60M's 5.325 TFLOPS. The same pattern holds for FP16 work, where the Lisuan part delivers 49.15 TFLOPS versus 10.65 TFLOPS for the Intel GPU. For workloads that scale with shading units, texture units, or render output capacity, the LX 7G100 holds an overwhelming advantage.

The pixel throughput numbers reinforce this split. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s, while the Intel Arc Pro A60M reaches 83.20 GPixel/s. Texture rate follows suit: 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX 7G100 versus 166.4 GTexel/s for the Arc Pro A60M. These metrics indicate that the LX 7G100 is built for high-resolution rendering and texture-heavy scenes, where its larger pool of execution resources can be fully utilized.

The Intel Arc Pro A60M, by contrast, wins in the efficiency and integration category. Its 95 W TDP is less than half of the LX 7G100's 225 W TDP. The Arc Pro A60M is an IGP-class part with a portable-device-dependent display output, making it suitable for compact systems where the LX 7G100's dual-slot, 294 mm length, and 1x 8-pin power connector would not fit. The Arc Pro A60M also supports Vulkan 1.4, compared to Vulkan 1.3 on the LX 7G100, a small but measurable API feature advantage.

The memory subsystem reveals another split. The LX 7G100 carries 12 GB of GDDR6 across a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc Pro A60M has 8 GB on a 128-bit bus, producing 256.0 GB/s. For datasets that exceed 8 GB, the LX 7G100 is the only option between the two. For workloads that fit within the smaller frame buffer, the bandwidth difference still matters, but the Intel part's lower power draw and mobile-oriented design give it a niche in power-constrained platforms.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design lineages. The Intel Arc Pro A60M uses the DG2-256 chip built on the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation for Pro-Series Mobile. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. The transistor density works out to 42.8M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip under the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. It is also built on a 6 nm TSMC process, but its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The execution resource counts diverge sharply. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The Arc Pro A60M has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. This means the Lisuan part has three times the shading units, 1.5 times the TMUs, and 1.5 times the ROPs. The LX 7G100 does not list ray tracing cores, while the Arc Pro A60M includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. Neither part lists tensor cores in the recorded data.

The memory architectures also differ. The Arc Pro A60M uses a 128-bit GDDR6 interface with 8 GB capacity and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The LX 7G100 uses a 192-bit GDDR6 interface with 12 GB capacity and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. Both use PCIe 4.0 x16 for host connectivity.

API support shows a partial divergence. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc Pro A60M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. The LX 7G100 lists four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, whereas the Arc Pro A60M's display outputs are dependent on the portable device it is installed in.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark scores for these two GPUs, and the wins count for each is zero. However, the specification-derived metrics provide a basis for comparison. The largest gap appears in FP32 compute. The LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS is roughly 4.6 times the Arc Pro A60M's 5.325 TFLOPS. In FP16, the Lisuan part's 49.15 TFLOPS is 4.6 times the Intel part's 10.65 TFLOPS. These ratios indicate that any shader-bound workload will favor the LX 7G100 by a wide margin.

Memory bandwidth shows a 1.69x advantage for the LX 7G100: 432.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s. The pixel rate difference is 2.31x in favor of the Lisuan part, and the texture rate difference is 2.31x as well. These are the largest recorded performance deltas between the two parts. The shading unit count ratio is 3.0x, which is even larger than the pixel and texture ratios, suggesting that the FP32 and FP16 compute ratios understate the raw ALU count advantage because clock speeds for the LX 7G100 are not recorded.

The Arc Pro A60M's advantages are not in raw throughput but in power and API level. Its 95 W TDP is 130 W lower than the LX 7G100's 225 W TDP, a 58% reduction in power draw. The Vulkan 1.4 support is one minor version ahead of the LX 7G100's Vulkan 1.3. These factors make the Arc Pro A60M the stronger choice for systems where power delivery and thermal limits are the binding constraints.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two GPUs differ, based on recorded data.

| Field | Intel Arc Pro A60M | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | DG2-256 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Alchemist (Pro-Series Mobile) | 7G100 |

| Transistors | 11,500 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 269 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 42.8M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 900 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 16 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 166.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 5.325 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 95 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | null | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | null | 294 mm x 120 mm x 49 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-06-05 | 2026-06-17 |

The release dates place the Arc Pro A60M three years earlier than the LX 7G100, which is consistent with the larger feature set and higher power envelope of the newer Lisuan part. The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card with a 294 mm length, while the Arc Pro A60M is an IGP-class component with no recorded dimensions, power connectors, or suggested PSU rating.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is roughly 4.6 times the Intel Arc Pro A60M's 5.325 TFLOPS, and its FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS is similarly 4.6 times the Intel part's 10.65 TFLOPS.

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Arc Pro A60M has 8 GB on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro A60M support ray tracing?

A: Yes. The Arc Pro A60M includes 16 ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 does not list any ray tracing cores in the recorded data.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The Arc Pro A60M has a 95 W TDP, while the LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP. The LX 7G100 requires a 1x 8-pin power connector and a suggested 550 W PSU, while the Arc Pro A60M lists no power connector or PSU requirement.

Q: Which card supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60M supports Vulkan 1.4, one version ahead of the LX 7G100's Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What are the physical size differences?

A: The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card measuring 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm. The Arc Pro A60M is an IGP-class part with no recorded dimensions, and its display outputs are dependent on the portable device it is installed in.