Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared benchmark scores for the Intel Arc Pro A60M and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. The Intel Arc Pro A60M has no recorded benchmark entries, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has a single recorded result in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, scoring 3075. Without overlapping tests, a direct performance comparison cannot be derived from the recorded data.

The RTX 5080 SUPER's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its measured score. It trails the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 by 2.8 percent, with the P1000 averaging 3163. It also trails the Intel Arc Pro B60 by 3.4 percent, which averages 3182. Conversely, it leads the NVIDIA GeForce 820A by 3.1 percent, which averages 2983, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M by 3.6 percent, which averages 2967. These deltas place the RTX 5080 SUPER within a narrow band of scores, all within roughly 3.6 percent of each other in this specific workload.

The Intel Arc Pro A60M's profile in the database shows zero benchmark scores and zero head-to-head results. Its percentile rank against all GPUs is 50, indicating it sits at the median of the database distribution, but this rank is not accompanied by any measured workload data. The RTX 5080 SUPER holds a percentile rank of 19 against all GPUs, which means it sits below the majority of recorded graphics cards in the database, despite its single Steel Nomad result. The discrepancy between the percentile ranks and the raw benchmark score suggests the percentile calculation incorporates a broader set of factors beyond just the Steel Nomad test.

The absence of shared benchmarks means there is no direct evidence for which card completes rendering tasks faster. The RTX 5080 SUPER has one data point, and the Arc Pro A60M has none. The nearest rival comparisons for the RTX 5080 SUPER show that its Steel Nomad score is competitive with older mobile and workstation GPUs, but those rivals are not the Arc Pro A60M. No extrapolation from the RTX 5080 SUPER's rivals to the Arc Pro A60M is possible, as the Arc Pro A60M does not appear in any rival list.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one firm conclusion: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has a measurable 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, while the Intel Arc Pro A60M has no recorded benchmark results. Any selection between the two must rely on the available specification and architecture data rather than workload performance.

The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers substantially higher compute throughput on paper. Its FP32 rate is 56.28 TFLOPS, its texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s, and its pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s. The Arc Pro A60M records 5.325 TFLOPS FP32, 166.4 GTexel/s, and 83.20 GPixel/s. The RTX 5080 SUPER also carries 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256 bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, versus 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth for the Arc Pro A60M. These figures indicate a wide gap in raw throughput capacity.

Users who require the higher memory capacity, faster memory bandwidth, and greater shader throughput should consider the RTX 5080 SUPER. Users who need a mobile-integrated, low-power part with a 95 W TDP and no external power connector requirement should consider the Arc Pro A60M, as its TDP is 415 W lower than the RTX 5080 SUPER's 415 W. The RTX 5080 SUPER requires a 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor, whereas the Arc Pro A60M is an IGP with portable-device-dependent display outputs.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro A60M have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the Arc Pro A60M has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of 0. It also has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER's recorded benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has one recorded result in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 3075 and an average benchmark score of 3075.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: It is 2.8 percent behind the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163), 3.4 percent behind the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182), 3.1 percent ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (2983), and 3.6 percent ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (2967).

Q: What are the memory configurations of the two GPUs?

A: The Arc Pro A60M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256 bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Arc Pro A60M has a TDP of 95 W and no power connectors listed. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a TDP of 415 W and uses one 16-pin power connector.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The Arc Pro A60M ranks at the 50th percentile against all GPUs. The RTX 5080 SUPER ranks at the 19th percentile against all GPUs.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measured specification. The Arc Pro A60M uses a DG2-256 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses a GB203 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. Transistor density also differs: 42.8M per mm² for the Arc Pro A60M versus 120.6M per mm² for the RTX 5080 SUPER.

Clock speeds diverge sharply. The Arc Pro A60M has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. Memory clocks are listed with different effective rates: 16 Gbps effective for the Arc Pro A60M versus 32 Gbps effective for the RTX 5080 SUPER.

Compute resources show a large gap. The Arc Pro A60M has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 RT cores. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores. The Arc Pro A60M lists no tensor cores. Pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s versus 293.1 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s versus 879.3 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 5.325 TFLOPS versus 56.28 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 10.65 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio versus 56.28 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Physical specifications differ as well. The Arc Pro A60M is listed as IGP slot width with no dimensions recorded. The RTX 5080 SUPER is dual-slot with a length of 304 mm, height of 137 mm, and width of 40 mm. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for the Arc Pro A60M and PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 5080 SUPER. Display outputs for the Arc Pro A60M are portable device dependent, while the RTX 5080 SUPER provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The release date for the Arc Pro A60M is June 5, 2023, and for the RTX 5080 SUPER is December 31, 2025. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a launch MSRP of 999 USD; the Arc Pro A60M has no launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro A60M uses the Xe-HPG architecture, branded as Alchemist, within the Pro-Series Mobile generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER uses Blackwell 2.0 architecture, belonging to the GeForce 50 series. These are fundamentally different GPU designs with different feature sets and execution models.

The Arc Pro A60M is built on a 6 nm TSMC process with 11,500 million transistors. The RTX 5080 SUPER is built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 45,600 million transistors. The RTX 5080 SUPER's die is larger at 378 mm² versus 269 mm², and its transistor density is nearly three times higher at 120.6M per mm² versus 42.8M per mm².

Memory architecture differs by generation. The Arc Pro A60M uses GDDR6 with a 128 bit bus, while the RTX 5080 SUPER uses GDDR7 with a 256 bit bus. Memory bandwidth scales accordingly, with the RTX 5080 SUPER reaching 1.02 TB/s compared to 256.0 GB/s for the Arc Pro A60M. The RTX 5080 SUPER's effective memory rate of 32 Gbps doubles the Arc Pro A60M's 16 Gbps effective rate.

The RTX 5080 SUPER includes tensor cores, 336 of them, which the Arc Pro A60M lacks entirely. RT core counts differ, 84 for the RTX 5080 SUPER versus 16 for the Arc Pro A60M. The FP16 execution ratio also differs: the Arc Pro A60M runs FP16 at half rate (2:1 ratio) achieving 10.65 TFLOPS, while the RTX 5080 SUPER runs FP16 at full rate (1:1 ratio) achieving 56.28 TFLOPS.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status for both is Active. The RTX 5080 SUPER carries the GeForce 50-series branding, while the Arc Pro A60M belongs to the Alchemist generation with no series name recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5080 SUPER wins on every recorded computational specification. It offers over ten times the FP32 throughput, 5.3 times the texture rate, and 3.5 times the pixel rate compared to the Arc Pro A60M. Its memory bandwidth is roughly four times higher, and it supports three times the memory capacity. It also adds tensor cores, which the Arc Pro A60M does not have, and doubles the memory bus width.

The RTX 5080 SUPER is the only one of the two with a recorded benchmark result. Its Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 places it within a small margin of the Quadro P1000, Arc Pro B60, GeForce 820A, and GTX 860M. This is the sole workload evidence in the database for either GPU.

The Arc Pro A60M wins on power efficiency and integration. Its TDP of 95 W is substantially lower than the RTX 5080 SUPER's 415 W. It requires no power connectors, whereas the RTX 5080 SUPER requires a 16-pin connector. The Arc Pro A60M is an IGP, meaning it is designed for integration into portable devices, while the RTX 5080 SUPER is a dual-slot discrete card measuring 304 mm in length. The Arc Pro A60M's display outputs are portable device dependent, reflecting its mobile integration target.

The Arc Pro A60M also holds a higher percentile rank against all GPUs at 50, compared to the RTX 5080 SUPER's 19. This rank reflects the database distribution rather than a direct workload comparison, since the Arc Pro A60M has no benchmark scores. The RTX 5080 SUPER's percentile rank of 19 indicates it falls below the majority of GPUs in the database, despite its high absolute specifications, which may be an artifact of the sparse benchmark coverage.

For workloads that demand maximum shader throughput, memory capacity, and ray tracing resources, the RTX 5080 SUPER is the clear choice from the recorded data. For systems constrained by power draw, physical space, or the need for an integrated mobile solution, the Arc Pro A60M is the only viable option between the two. The database provides no evidence that the Arc Pro A60M can match the RTX 5080 SUPER in any measured rendering workload, because no such workload is recorded for the Arc Pro A60M.