Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The database places both the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with no recorded head-to-head benchmark scores. The data therefore offers no direct performance ranking between them. What the specifications do show is a fundamental divide in purpose: the Intel part is an integrated graphics processor for mobile systems, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a discrete, dual-slot expansion card with dedicated memory and a power connector. The recorded data indicates that the LX PRO is designed for workloads demanding high throughput and substantial frame buffer capacity, whereas the Arc 64EU targets space and power constrained laptops.

For any workload that requires more than a few gigabytes of video memory or sustained high-resolution output, the LX PRO is the only defensible choice based on the database. The Arc 64EU, with system-shared memory and a 65 W TDP, fits scenarios where the GPU must share the system's power budget and physical space. The data does not support a claim that either part outperforms the other in raw speed, because no benchmark results are recorded. The verdict is strictly a matter of class and capability: the LX PRO is a standalone compute and rendering device, the Arc 64EU is an embedded graphics solution.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs share no common architecture lineage in the recorded data. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile uses the Xe-LPG architecture on a 10 nm process node, fabricated by Intel. Its chip is Meteor Lake, and it belongs to the Arc Graphics-M generation. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses an architecture labeled TrueGPU, built by TSMC on a 6 nm process, with the chip designation 7G105 from the 7G100 generation. The manufacturing differences are clear: Intel produces its own silicon at 10 nm, while the LX PRO is fabricated by TSMC at 6 nm. The smaller node gives the LX PRO a potential density and efficiency advantage, though the database does not provide transistor counts or die sizes to confirm this.

The Intel part is an IGP with a Ring Bus interface, meaning it is integrated into the host processor's interconnect. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a discrete card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, a dual-slot cooler, dimensions of 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm, and a 16-pin power connector. The LX PRO also carries a suggested PSU rating of 550 W, while the Intel part has no power connector at all. The two devices belong to different physical categories: one is embedded, the other is a removable expansion card.

The DirectX feature levels differ as well. The Arc 64EU supports DirectX 12 (12_1). The LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), the higher tier. Vulkan support is close: the Intel part lists Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO lists Vulkan 1.3. OpenGL is identical at 4.6. The LX PRO includes four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the Intel part's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Both parts have zero recorded wins and zero benchmark scores. Consequently, there are no exact performance deltas, no percentile shifts, and no nearest rival comparisons to cite. The absence of data is itself informative: the two products are so dissimilar in form factor and target platform that the database has not paired them in any measured test.

What can be compared directly are the computed throughput figures from the specification table. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, against 1.792 TFLOPS for the Arc 64EU. That is a large gap, roughly an order of magnitude, but it is a specification-based difference, not a measured benchmark win. The pixel rate follows the same pattern: the LX PRO outputs 192.0 GPixel/s versus 28.00 GPixel/s for the Intel part. Texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 56.00 GTexel/s. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The Arc 64EU has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc 64EU uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. These are the only quantitative comparisons the database supports.

The boost clock tells part of the story: the Arc 64EU boosts to 1750 MHz, while the LX PRO has no recorded base or boost clock. The LX PRO's memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every recorded field. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1750 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded base or boost clocks. Memory size differs completely: 24 GB of GDDR6 on the LX PRO versus system shared on the Intel part. The bus width is 192 bit on the LX PRO, system shared on the Intel part. Memory bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s on the LX PRO, system dependent on the Intel part.

Shading units are 512 for Intel versus 6144 for Lisuan Tech. TMUs are 32 versus 192. ROPs are 16 versus 96. FP32 compute is 1.792 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 compute is 3.584 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). TDP is 65 W versus 225 W. Slot width is IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors are absent on the Intel part, while the LX PRO requires a single 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. The bus interface is Ring Bus versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are portable device dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The process node is 10 nm versus 6 nm. The foundry is Intel versus TSMC.

The release dates also differ: the Intel part launched on 2023-12-13, while the LX PRO is dated 2026-03-16. Both are marked as Active in production status. The Arc 64EU has a predecessor, HD Graphics-M, while the LX PRO has none recorded. Neither part has a successor or a launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6144 shading units, while the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has 512 shading units.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile have dedicated video memory?

A: No. Its memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as system shared, and bandwidth is system dependent. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has a TDP of 65 W. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU supports a higher DirectX feature level?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: What is the FP32 compute performance of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile delivers 1.792 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: How do the display outputs differ?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile lists its display outputs as portable device dependent.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile wins on integration and power economy. Its 65 W TDP, Ring Bus interface, and IGP slot width mean it requires no additional power connector and no expansion slot. It is built for mobile systems where space is fixed and power is shared. The Xe-LPG architecture on a 10 nm Intel process keeps the part inside the host platform. For a thin laptop or a low-power portable device, the recorded data shows this is the only viable option of the two.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins on raw compute and memory capacity. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 24 GB frame buffer put it in a different class for rendering, machine learning, or any task that fits large datasets in video memory. The 192-bit GDDR6 interface and 96 ROPs support high-resolution output across four DisplayPort connections. The dual-slot cooler and 16-pin power connector indicate a desktop workstation or high-end gaming tower, not a portable chassis.

The absence of recorded benchmarks means the database cannot assign a single winner across all workloads. The use case split is structural: the Arc 64EU is the only integrated option, the LX PRO is the only discrete option. The LX PRO's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface align with modern discrete GPU expectations, while the Arc 64EU's DirectX 12 (12_1) and Ring Bus fit its embedded role. The LX PRO also has a higher Vulkan version at 1.4 versus 1.3 for the Arc, though the Intel part reports a newer DirectX revision tier at 12_1 while the LX PRO reaches 12_2.

The release timeline separates them further. The Intel part launched in December 2023, the LX PRO in March 2026. The LX PRO is a later product built on a smaller TSMC node, which typically indicates a newer design, though the database provides no efficiency metrics to confirm that. The Intel part has a predecessor in HD Graphics-M, while the LX PRO has no recorded lineage. Both remain active, so neither has been discontinued.

The data supports one clear conclusion: the LX PRO is for workloads that need dedicated memory, high pixel throughput, and desktop-class power delivery. The Arc 64EU is for systems that need graphics without a discrete card. No measured benchmark bridges the two, so the decision rests on platform compatibility and the recorded specification gaps.