Intel Arc Graphics 24EU vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205. The database shows zero wins for either product in benchmark tests, as the headToHeadBenchmarks field is empty.

However, the available benchmark data for the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU provides a reference point. The Intel part scores 733 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which places it in the 3rd percentile of all GPUs in the database. This score is identical to the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU (733, 0% delta) and the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU (733, 0% delta), indicating that within this integrated graphics family, the 24EU configuration delivers the same measured performance in this specific test.

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU sits 1.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 6470M, which scores 723, and 2.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M, which scores 751. These rival comparisons demonstrate the relatively narrow performance band around the 733 score, with the Intel part landing between older discrete mobile GPUs.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it has no nearest rivals recorded. The percentile placement of 50th among all GPUs indicates a midpoint position in the overall distribution, but this figure cannot be corroborated with any actual test scores from the data.

Because the RTX 5060 GB205 lacks benchmark entries, the head-to-head analysis must rely on architectural and specification comparisons rather than measured performance deltas. The Intel part has a confirmed 3DMark score, while the NVIDIA part has no such data point to compare against.

FAQ

Q: What is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score for the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU scores 733 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it in the 3rd percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database shows an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals for this product.

Q: How does the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU compare to its closest rivals in the database?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU scores 733, which is identical to the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU (both 733, 0% delta). It is 1.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 6470M (723) and 2.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M (751).

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each product?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU sits in the 3rd percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 sits in the 50th percentile.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205?

A: The launch MSRP is 299 USD.

Q: What is the release date for each product?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU was released on 2024-10-23, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 is dated 2026-05-31.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU wins in the only available benchmark test: it delivers a 733 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This is the sole performance data point in the comparison, giving the Intel part a measurable advantage in the database, even if that advantage is modest relative to its immediate peers.

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU also wins on power consumption, with a 65 W TDP compared to the NVIDIA part's 145 W. For systems where thermal and power budgets are constrained, the Intel part uses less than half the power envelope of the RTX 5060 GB205 while still providing a recorded 3DMark score.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 wins on every specification category where numbers exist. It has 3840 shading units versus 192, 120 texture mapping units versus 12, and 48 raster output units versus 6. The RTX 5060 GB205 also includes 30 ray tracing cores and 120 tensor cores, features absent from the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU.

The NVIDIA part delivers 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel part delivers 768.0 GFLOPS. The RTX 5060 GB205 provides 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, whereas the Intel part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

For dedicated graphics workloads, the RTX 5060 GB205 is the clear winner on raw throughput. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU wins on integration and power efficiency, being an IGP with a 65 W TDP and no power connectors.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every measured specification. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses a 3 nm process node, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 uses a 5 nm node, both fabricated by TSMC. The Intel chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, while the NVIDIA chip contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. Transistor density is 73.3M per mm² for Intel and 118.3M per mm² for NVIDIA.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The NVIDIA part has a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2497 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz or 28 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration is fundamentally different. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses system shared memory with a system shared bus width and system dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA RTX 5060 GB205 has 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute resources show a 20-fold difference in shading units: 192 for Intel versus 3840 for NVIDIA. Texture mapping units are 12 versus 120, and raster output units are 6 versus 48. The NVIDIA part includes 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, which the Intel part does not list.

Pixel and texture rates reflect the resource disparity. The Intel part achieves 12.00 GPixel/s and 24.00 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA part achieves 119.9 GPixel/s and 299.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 768.0 GFLOPS for Intel versus 19.18 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. FP16 performance is 1.536 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) for Intel versus 19.18 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) for NVIDIA.

Power and physical specifications differ as well. The Intel part has a 65 W TDP, is an IGP with a Ring Bus interface, and has motherboard dependent display outputs. The NVIDIA part has a 145 W TDP, a dual-slot design, a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, and a 1x 8-pin power connector with a 300 W suggested PSU. The RTX 5060 GB205 measures 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is built on the Xe-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics (Arrow Lake) generation. It is an integrated graphics solution using a Ring Bus interface. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 series. It is a discrete, dual-slot card using PCIe 5.0 x8.

The Intel part is manufactured on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors. The NVIDIA part uses a 5 nm TSMC process with 31,100 million transistors. The Intel chip has a die size of 243 mm², while the NVIDIA chip is 263 mm².

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has no listed ray tracing cores or tensor cores. The NVIDIA RTX 5060 GB205 includes 30 ray tracing cores and 120 tensor cores, indicating dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads that the Intel part lacks entirely.

Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The API compatibility is identical, but the underlying hardware differs significantly in capability.

The Intel part is an IGP with system shared memory, meaning it relies on the host system's memory for all graphics data. The NVIDIA part has dedicated 8 GB GDDR7 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, providing a fixed and high-bandwidth memory pool.

The Intel part has a predecessor listed as HD Graphics and a production status of Active. The NVIDIA part lists GeForce 40 as its predecessor and GeForce 60 as its successor, also with an Active production status.

The NVIDIA RTX 5060 GB205 includes display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the Intel IGP's outputs are motherboard dependent.

The Verdict

The data indicates two products at opposite ends of the graphics spectrum. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is an integrated solution with a 733 3DMark Steel Nomad score, 192 shading units, and a 65 W TDP. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 has no recorded benchmark score but offers 3840 shading units, 19.18 TFLOPS FP32, 8 GB GDDR7, and a 145 W TDP.

For users seeking a discrete graphics card with dedicated memory and high throughput, the NVIDIA RTX 5060 GB205 is the only choice in this comparison. The specification gap is massive: 20 times more shading units, 10 times more texture mapping units, 8 times more raster output units, and 25 times more FP32 performance. The RTX 5060 GB205 also includes ray tracing and tensor cores, enabling workloads the Intel part cannot address.

For systems requiring an integrated graphics solution with minimal power draw, the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU fits that role. Its 65 W TDP, IGP form factor, and Ring Bus interface make it suitable for processors with integrated graphics. The 733 3DMark score places it in the 3rd percentile, which is low but expected for an integrated part.

The RTX 5060 GB205 sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, a midpoint placement. However, this percentile is recorded without any benchmark score, so it cannot be validated against measured performance. The Intel part's 3rd percentile is backed by an actual 733 score.

The NVIDIA part has a launch MSRP of 299 USD, and its successor is already listed as GeForce 60. The Intel part has no MSRP recorded and no successor listed.

Users who prioritize measured performance data should note that only the Intel part has a recorded benchmark. Users who prioritize raw specifications should note that the NVIDIA part dominates every compute and memory metric. The choice depends on whether the workload requires a discrete card with dedicated VRAM or an integrated solution with low power consumption.