Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. This absence of shared test scores means a direct per-test comparison is not possible from the database. However, the available single benchmark for the NVIDIA part, combined with the Intel part's zero recorded average benchmark score, provides a clear picture of their relative standing in the broader GPU landscape.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has one recorded benchmark result: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. Its average benchmark score across the database sits at 6270. This places the card at the 36th percentile of all GPUs tracked by the database. The Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile, by contrast, holds a 50th percentile ranking but carries an average benchmark score of 0. This disparity indicates that the Intel integrated solution has no recorded performance data in the database, while the NVIDIA discrete card has at least one verified measurement.

Looking at the NVIDIA card's nearest rivals, the data reveals a tightly clustered performance band. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's average score of 6270 matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 exactly, with a delta of 0 percent. The AMD FirePro W600 sits slightly behind at an average score of 6223, which is 0.8 percent lower than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 posts an average score of 6282, a 0.2 percent advantage over the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads the group with an average score of 6327, beating the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER by 0.9 percent. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers performance essentially identical to its nearest competitors in the database's recorded measurements.

The Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile has no nearest rivals listed and no benchmark entries. Its 50th percentile ranking is based on hardware characteristics rather than measured performance, since the average benchmark score of 0 confirms the absence of any test results. This makes any quantitative head-to-head analysis between the two parts impossible. The only meaningful comparison available is between the NVIDIA card and its own nearest rivals, which shows a near-dead heat among four GPUs separated by less than 1 percent in average score.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU in the database?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 6270, based on a single recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 6269.5. The Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0, with no benchmark entries recorded.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's average score of 6270 exactly matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102. The AMD FirePro W600 trails by 0.8 percent, the NVIDIA Quadro K620 leads by 0.2 percent, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads by 0.9 percent. All four rivals fall within a 0.9 percent band of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER.

Q: What percentile ranking does each GPU hold?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The launch MSRP is 749 USD.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile have any recorded performance data?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmarks for the Intel part, and its average benchmark score is 0. The 50th percentile ranking reflects its hardware profile rather than measured results.

Q: What is the only benchmark recorded for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The database records a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test with a score of 6269.5.

The Verdict

The data supports a decisive split between these two products. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a discrete, high-performance card with a recorded benchmark score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and an average score of 6270. It uses 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivers 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and produces 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. Its 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores position it for heavy graphics workloads. The card occupies the 36th percentile in the database, with nearest rivals all scoring within 0.9 percent, confirming that its measured performance lands in a well-populated competitive band.

The Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile is an integrated GPU with no recorded benchmark results. Its average score of 0 and empty benchmark list mean the database cannot confirm any level of real-world performance. The 50th percentile ranking is misleading in this context, as it is not backed by any measured data. The part does deliver 4.608 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 72.00 GPixel/s of pixel throughput, and 144.0 GTexel/s of texture throughput on paper, but those figures cannot be validated against actual tests.

Users seeking a verified, high-throughput discrete GPU with substantial memory bandwidth and ray tracing capabilities should select the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Users constrained to an integrated solution with no discrete graphics option may consider the Intel part, but the database provides no evidence of its performance. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only one of the two with any recorded benchmark evidence, and it is the only one with a launch MSRP of 749 USD.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measurable specification. The Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses a 5 nm node from TSMC. The NVIDIA chip packs 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, with a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The Intel part does not list transistor count, die size, or density in the database.

Clock speeds diverge sharply. The Intel GPU runs at a 300 MHz base clock and a 2250 MHz boost clock. The NVIDIA GPU runs at a 2295 MHz base clock and a 2452 MHz boost clock. Memory configurations are fundamentally different: the Intel part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, while the NVIDIA card uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 1750 MHz, or 28 Gbps effective.

Compute resources show a large gap. The Intel GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. The NVIDIA GPU has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Intel part lists no ray tracing cores or tensor cores, while the NVIDIA card includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. Pixel rate on the Intel part is 72.00 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s on the NVIDIA card. Texture rate is 144.0 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 4.608 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS. FP16 throughput is 9.216 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio on the Intel part, versus 43.94 TFLOPS at 1:1 on the NVIDIA card.

Power and physical characteristics differ as well. The Intel GPU has a TDP of 28 W and an IGP slot width. The NVIDIA GPU has a TDP of 350 W, a dual-slot form factor, and a single 16-pin power connector. The Intel part uses a Ring Bus interface, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs on the Intel part are portable device dependent; the NVIDIA card offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The NVIDIA card measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The Intel part has no listed dimensions.

DirectX support differs: the Intel GPU supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the NVIDIA GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 749 USD; the Intel part has no launch MSRP listed.

Architecture Differences

The architecture gap between these two GPUs is fundamental. The Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile is built on Intel's Xe-LPG architecture, part of the Meteor Lake chip, and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Meteor Lake) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB203 chip, part of the GeForce 50 series and the GeForce 50 generation.

The Intel part is an integrated GPU with no discrete memory of its own, relying entirely on system shared memory. This architectural choice means its memory bandwidth is system dependent, and it cannot match the dedicated memory subsystem of a discrete card. The NVIDIA part uses a dedicated 16 GB GDDR7 pool with a 256-bit bus and 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, an arrangement suited to high-resolution textures and large data sets.

Ray tracing and tensor compute are absent from the Intel architecture's listed specifications. The NVIDIA architecture includes 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. The Intel part has no such hardware listed in the database.

The compute pipeline differs in scale. The Intel GPU's 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs represent a compact integrated design. The NVIDIA GPU's 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs represent a full-scale discrete implementation. FP32 throughput on the Intel part is 4.608 TFLOPS, roughly one-tenth of the NVIDIA part's 43.94 TFLOPS. FP16 throughput on the Intel part is 9.216 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, indicating a split-rate design, while the NVIDIA part maintains 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, indicating uniform rate across both precisions.

The process node difference is significant: Intel uses 10 nm, NVIDIA uses 5 nm from TSMC. The NVIDIA chip also carries 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, a level of complexity not listed for the Intel part. The Intel GPU's production status is Active with a release date of 2023-12-13, while the NVIDIA GPU is also Active with a release date of 2025-12-31. The Intel part lists its predecessor as HD Graphics-M, while the NVIDIA part has no predecessor listed.

The bus interface reinforces the architectural divide: the Intel IGP uses a Ring Bus, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display output capabilities also reflect their different targets, with the Intel part dependent on the portable device's own outputs and the NVIDIA card providing dedicated HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1b connectors. The NVIDIA card's dual-slot cooler and 350 W TDP stand against the Intel part's 28 W IGP design, underscoring the difference between a power-constrained integrated solution and a high-throughput discrete card.