Intel Arc B570 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Arc B570 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no individual benchmark entries in the database. Consequently, the Intel Arc B570 holds all recorded benchmark scores, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has none.

The Intel Arc B570 posts an average benchmark score of 20556 across its tested workloads. This places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the average score ranking are tightly clustered: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534 (0.1% behind), the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582 (0.1% ahead), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480 (0.4% behind), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662 (0.5% ahead). The B570 effectively sits within a 0.5% band of these four cards, indicating that its average performance is comparable to a mix of mobile and older desktop parts.

In specific tests, the Arc B570 shows its strongest result in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 96844, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 83514. The Passmark G3D score reaches 14195, while Passmark GPU Compute records 7281. The DirectX-focused Passmark tests are lower: DirectX 11 scores 118, DirectX 9 scores 164, DirectX 12 scores 72, and DirectX 10 scores 65. The Passmark G2D score is 661. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 2649.

Because the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has zero benchmark entries, its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it sits at the 50th percentile in the database. There are no rival comparisons for the LX PRO, and no wins are recorded for either card in the head-to-head section. The data cannot confirm any performance advantage for the LX PRO in any tested workload, simply because no measurements exist for it.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc B570 uses the BMG-G21 chip built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage (Arc 5) generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, for a transistor density of 72.1 million per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip based on the TrueGPU architecture, from the 7G100 generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and its transistor density is not recorded.

The Intel part includes 18 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO lists no ray tracing core count in the database. Neither card has recorded tensor core counts.

The Arc B570 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This gives the LX PRO twice the PCIe lanes, which can matter for data transfer in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios, though the database does not provide direct performance measurements to confirm any impact.

Memory architecture differs as well. The Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, producing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, producing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO therefore carries 14 GB more memory and 52.0 GB/s more bandwidth. The memory clock on the B570 is 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), while the LX PRO runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), so the B570 has the higher memory clock but the LX PRO has the wider bus.

Compute resources are heavily skewed toward the LX PRO. It records 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The Arc B570 has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The LX PRO has 384.0 GTexel/s of texture rate versus 360.0 GTexel/s for the B570. Pixel rates are closer: the LX PRO records 192.0 GPixel/s, while the B570 records 200.0 GPixel/s, meaning the Intel card actually has the higher pixel throughput.

Floating-point performance strongly favors the LX PRO. Its FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS, more than double the B570's 11.52 TFLOPS. FP16 performance follows the same pattern: the LX PRO delivers 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1) for the B570.

API support is similar but not identical. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc B570 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs differ: the B570 has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and no HDMI output.

Power and physical specifications also diverge. The Arc B570 has a TDP of 150 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. Both are dual-slot cards. The B570 measures 272 mm in length and 115 mm in height, while the LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The LX PRO is shorter but slightly taller and includes a recorded width; the B570 has no recorded width.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on recorded data, the Intel Arc B570 wins in every category where measurements exist. It has benchmark scores across 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark suites; the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has none. The B570 also wins on pixel rate, delivering 200.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO. It has the higher memory clock at 2375 MHz against 2250 MHz, and it supports the newer Vulkan 1.4 API compared to Vulkan 1.3 on the LX PRO. Its display output set includes HDMI 2.1a and DisplayPort 2.1, which are newer standards than the LX PRO's DisplayPort 1.4a.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins on raw compute specifications. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is 13.06 TFLOPS higher than the B570's 11.52 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is 26.11 TFLOPS higher. It has 6144 shading units versus 2304, 192 TMUs versus 144, and 96 ROPs versus 80. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s exceeds the B570's 360.0 GTexel/s. The LX PRO also holds the memory capacity advantage with 24 GB versus 10 GB, the bus width advantage with 192-bit versus 160-bit, and the bandwidth advantage with 432.0 GB/s versus 380.0 GB/s. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface compared to x8 on the B570.

The LX PRO also wins on power delivery configuration, with a 16-pin connector that can supply more power than the B570's 8-pin connector, consistent with its higher 225 W TDP. Its 550 W suggested power supply is higher than the B570's 450 W suggestion, which reflects the larger power envelope.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc B570 | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Chip | BMG-G21 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Battlemage (Arc 5) | 7G100 |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 19,600 million | unknown |

| Die size | 272 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 72.1M / mm² | not recorded |

| Base clock | 2500 MHz | not recorded |

| Boost clock | 2500 MHz | not recorded |

| Memory clock | 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| Memory size | 10 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 160 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 380.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 2304 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 144 | 192 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| Ray tracing cores | 18 | not recorded |

| Pixel rate | 200.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 360.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 11.52 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 150 W | 225 W |

| Power connector | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 272 mm (10.7 inches) | 248 mm (9.8 inches) |

| Height | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | 118 mm (4.6 inches) |

| Width | not recorded | 48 mm (1.9 inches) |

| Launch MSRP | 219 USD | not recorded |

| Release date | 2025-01-15 | 2026-03-16 |

Both cards share the same memory type (GDDR6), the same TSMC foundry, the same DirectX 12 Ultimate support, OpenGL 4.6 support, dual-slot form factor, and active production status.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO records 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is more than double the Intel Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6.

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, exceeding the Intel Arc B570's 380.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the Intel Arc B570 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 18 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no ray tracing core count recorded in the database.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has a 150 W TDP and suggests a 450 W power supply. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 225 W TDP and suggests a 550 W power supply.

Q: Which card has recorded benchmark scores?

A: Only the Intel Arc B570 has benchmark scores in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark entries, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

The Verdict

The Intel Arc B570 is the only one of the two with measured performance data. Its average benchmark score of 20556 places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are within a 0.5% spread, confirming that its measured performance aligns with cards like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and the Intel Arc A750. It also carries the only ray tracing cores in this comparison, supports the newer Vulkan 1.4 standard, and offers a higher pixel rate at 200.0 GPixel/s. Its launch MSRP is 219 USD.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO cannot be evaluated on measured performance because the database contains no benchmark results for it. What the specifications show is a card built for compute volume: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 6144 shading units, 24 GB of memory, and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. These are substantially higher numbers than the B570 on paper. The LX PRO also uses a wider PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and a 192-bit memory bus.

For anyone relying on recorded measurements, the Intel Arc B570 is the only card with evidence of performance. For anyone prioritizing specification sheet capacity, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO offers more compute, memory, and bandwidth, but with no benchmark data to confirm how that translates into real workloads. The B570 is the verified performer; the LX PRO is the unverified specification leader.