Intel Arc B570 vs Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no shared benchmark results between the Intel Arc B570 and the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile. The Arc B570 has a full benchmark suite, while the Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark entries. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible. The nearest rivals for the Arc B570 provide the only comparative anchor. The Arc B570 sits within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, whose average score is 20534. It also lands within 0.1% of the Intel Arc A750, which averages 20582. Against the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, the Arc B570 is 0.4% ahead, and against the AMD Radeon R9 M390X, it is 0.5% behind. These deltas are effectively negligible, indicating that the Arc B570 occupies a performance tier shared with those four products.

The Arc B570's own scores show its strengths. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), it records 2649 points. In Geekbench OpenCL, it reaches 83514 points, and in Geekbench Vulkan, 96844 points. The PassMark G3D score is 14195, while PassMark GPU Compute is 7281. The average benchmark score across all its recorded tests is 20556. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no scores, so its relative position is expressed only through its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The Arc B570 sits at the 65th percentile. The data confirms the Arc B570 as the measurably stronger part, but the absence of any head-to-head results prevents a per-test win count. The wins fields are both zero, meaning the database records no direct victories for either product.

Architecture Differences

The two Intel parts come from different design generations and process nodes. The Arc B570 uses the BMG-G21 chip with the Xe2-HPG architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses the Wildcat Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process at Intel. The Arc B570 belongs to the Battlemage (Arc 5) generation, while the mobile part belongs to Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake). The Arc B570's predecessor is Alchemist; the mobile part's predecessor is HD Graphics-M.

The compute resources differ substantially. The Arc B570 has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. It also has 18 ray tracing cores. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and 1 ray tracing core. The transistor counts are not directly comparable because the mobile part's transistor count and die size are marked as unknown in the database. The Arc B570 packs 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 72.1M per mm².

Clock behavior also differs. The Arc B570 runs at a fixed 2500 MHz for both base and boost. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. Memory architecture is a major separator. The Arc B570 uses 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The mobile part uses system shared memory, with its bus width, size, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. The memory clock for the Arc B570 is 2375 MHz, which the database records as 19 Gbps effective. The mobile part's memory clock is simply "System Shared."

The TDP figures show the intended usage segments. The Arc B570 draws 150 W and requires a dual-slot cooler with a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 450 W. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is an integrated graphics processor, consuming 25 W, using no power connectors, and having no suggested PSU. The bus interface also differs: PCIe 4.0 x8 for the Arc B570 versus IGP for the mobile part. Display outputs on the Arc B570 include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The mobile part lists display outputs as portable device dependent.

Both parts share the same API support on paper: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The release dates are recorded as 2025-01-15 for the Arc B570 and 2026-04-15 for the Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile.

Where Each One Wins

The Arc B570 wins in every measurable category because it is the only one of the two with benchmark data. Its 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it above the mobile part's 50th percentile. The Arc B570's pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s versus 9.200 GPixel/s for the integrated part. Its texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s versus 18.40 GTexel/s. Its FP32 throughput is 11.52 TFLOPS versus 588.8 GFLOPS, and its FP16 throughput is 23.04 TFLOPS versus 1,177.6 GFLOPS, with both using a 2:1 ratio. These figures confirm that the Arc B570 is designed for discrete desktop workloads, while the Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is a low-power integrated solution.

The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile wins on power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is one-sixth that of the Arc B570. It requires no power connector and no separate slot. Its 3 nm Intel process is smaller than the Arc B570's 5 nm TSMC node, which may indicate a newer manufacturing approach, though the database gives no transistor count for the mobile part. The mobile part's Xe3-LPG architecture is a later generation than the Arc B570's Xe2-HPG. For portable devices, the integrated part has the advantage of no additional board space and no external power delivery.

The Arc B570 wins on memory bandwidth. Its 380.0 GB/s dedicated GDDR6 bandwidth is a fixed value, whereas the mobile part's bandwidth is system dependent. In compute-heavy tasks such as Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan, the Arc B570's recorded scores of 83514 and 96844 demonstrate its capability. The mobile part has no such scores. The Arc B570 also wins on ray tracing resources, with 18 dedicated RT cores versus 1 on the mobile part.

Specification Differences

The two products differ in nearly every recorded specification field. The chip names are BMG-G21 versus Wildcat Lake. The architectures are Xe2-HPG versus Xe3-LPG. The generations are Battlemage (Arc 5) versus Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake). The process nodes are 5 nm TSMC versus 3 nm Intel. The transistor counts are 19,600 million versus unknown. The die sizes are 272 mm² versus unknown.

Clock speeds differ: base clock 2500 MHz versus 300 MHz, boost clock 2500 MHz versus 2300 MHz. Memory size is 10 GB GDDR6 versus system shared. Memory bus width is 160 bit versus system shared. Memory bandwidth is 380.0 GB/s versus system dependent. The shading units are 2304 versus 128. TMUs are 144 versus 8. ROPs are 80 versus 4. Ray tracing cores are 18 versus 1.

Pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s versus 9.200 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s versus 18.40 GTexel/s. FP32 is 11.52 TFLOPS versus 588.8 GFLOPS. FP16 is 23.04 TFLOPS versus 1,177.6 GFLOPS. TDP is 150 W versus 25 W. Slot width is dual-slot versus IGP. Power connectors are 1x 8-pin versus none. Suggested PSU is 450 W versus not applicable. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 versus IGP. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 versus portable device dependent.

The Arc B570 has dimensions of 272 mm length and 115 mm height. The mobile part has no recorded dimensions. The Arc B570 has a launch MSRP of 219 USD. The mobile part has no launch MSRP. The Arc B570 has a predecessor of Alchemist; the mobile part has a predecessor of HD Graphics-M. The release dates differ by more than a year, with the Arc B570 at 2025-01-15 and the mobile part at 2026-04-15. Both are listed as active in production. The APIs are identical: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4.

The average benchmark score for the Arc B570 is 20556, while the mobile part averages 0 because it has no recorded benchmarks. The Arc B570 has nearest rivals, but the mobile part has none. The percentile ranking is 65 versus 50.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0 because the database contains no benchmark entries for it.

Q: Which part has a higher FP32 throughput?

A: The Arc B570 delivers 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile delivers 588.8 GFLOPS, which is significantly lower.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B570 is within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (average score 20534) and within 0.1% of the Intel Arc A750 (average score 20582). It is 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon R9 M390X.

Q: What memory configuration does each use?

A: The Arc B570 uses 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent.

Q: Are the API features the same?

A: Yes, both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What are the TDP values for each?

A: The Arc B570 has a TDP of 150 W and requires a dual-slot cooler with one 8-pin power connector. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W and uses no power connectors, being an integrated graphics processor.