Intel Arc B370 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data offers only one direct benchmark result for the Intel Arc B370: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark entries in the database, which makes a direct numerical comparison impossible. The absence of a score for the LX ULTRA means the database cannot confirm how it performs in the same workload. The Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, placing it near the lower end of the performance distribution. Its nearest rivals in the database include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 with an average score of 1186, a difference of 0.2% in favor of the ATI part, and the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190, which leads by 0.5%. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, putting it 0.7% ahead. On the other side, the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which the Arc B370 beats by 1.4%.

The LX ULTRA, by contrast, has a percentile ranking of 50, exactly the median of all GPUs, but this ranking is not backed by any recorded benchmark score. The percentile appears to rely on projected or estimated data, not measured results. Without a Steel Nomad score, the LX ULTRA cannot be placed on the same scale as the Arc B370. The only quantitative anchor for the LX ULTRA comes from its specifications, which are dramatically higher: 6144 shading units versus 1280, 192 texture mapping units versus 40, and 96 render output units versus 20. The pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s compared to 48.00 GPixel/s, exactly four times higher. The texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is also four times the Arc B370's 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 24.58 TFLOPS against 6.144 TFLOPS, a factor of exactly four. FP16 performance follows the same ratio, with 49.15 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS.

These figures suggest that if the LX ULTRA were benchmarked, it would likely outperform the Arc B370 by a large margin, but the database does not contain the measured proof. The Arc B370 does hold one clear advantage in the data: it has 10 ray tracing cores, while the LX ULTRA has no ray tracing core count listed at all. The Arc B370 also supports Vulkan 1.4, whereas the LX ULTRA lists Vulkan 1.3. Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, so those API levels are identical.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B370 wins in the only benchmark that has a recorded score. It delivers 1184 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, and the LX ULTRA has no score to counter it. The Arc B370 also wins on ray tracing capability, with 10 dedicated RT cores present in the data, while the LX ULTRA has no RT core count. For portable or integrated scenarios, the Arc B370 is an IGP with a 25 W TDP and no power connectors, which means it fits into compact systems without external power. Its memory is system shared, so it draws from the host's RAM rather than requiring dedicated VRAM. The LX ULTRA, by contrast, is a dual-slot discrete card with a 225 W TDP and a single 16-pin power connector, requiring a 550 W suggested PSU. It measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins decisively on raw specification count. It has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc B370 has no dedicated memory size, type, bus width, or bandwidth figures; all are marked as system dependent or shared. The LX ULTRA's memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The LX ULTRA also has four times the shading units, TMUs, and ROPs, and four times the FP32 and FP16 throughput. Its pixel rate and texture rate are each exactly four times higher. The LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Arc B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel. The LX ULTRA connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Arc B370 uses an integrated graphics interface with no bus slot.

The LX ULTRA also wins on display outputs, listing 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the Arc B370's outputs are listed as portable device dependent, meaning they vary by system. The LX ULTRA has a higher percentile ranking at 50 compared to the Arc B370's 5, although this ranking is not tied to any measured benchmark score. In terms of release timing, the LX ULTRA was released on 2026-03-16, later than the Arc B370's 2026-01-26 release date.

The Verdict

The data does not support a direct performance verdict because the LX ULTRA has no benchmark scores. The Arc B370 is the only one with a measured result, and that result places it at the 5th percentile, close to legacy mobile GPUs like the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and AMD Radeon HD 7650M. The LX ULTRA's specifications point to a much higher ceiling, with four times the shader throughput, texture rate, and pixel rate, plus 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory. The percentile gap, 5 versus 50, suggests the LX ULTRA is expected to land in the middle of the GPU distribution, but the database does not confirm this with a score.

A user who needs a measured, verified result should rely on the Arc B370, since it has an actual Steel Nomad score of 1184. A user who needs maximum compute resources, large dedicated memory, or high memory bandwidth should look at the LX ULTRA, since its specifications dwarf the Arc B370 in every numerical category except ray tracing cores and Vulkan version. The Arc B370 is the only option for an integrated, low-power setup with no external power requirement. The LX ULTRA requires a 550 W PSU, a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, and a dual-slot chassis. Neither part has a launch MSRP recorded, so no pricing data exists in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher 3DMark Steel Nomad score?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a score of 1184. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark score in the database.

Q: How does the Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370 trails the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 by 0.2%, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 by 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M by 0.7%. It leads the AMD FirePro M2000 by 1.4%.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc B370 has system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units. The Arc B370 has 1280.

Q: Does either GPU support ray tracing?

A: The Arc B370 lists 10 ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA has no ray tracing core count recorded.

Q: What are the TDP requirements?

A: The Arc B370 has a 25 W TDP and no power connectors. The LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested PSU with a 16-pin connector.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from completely different design lineages. The Intel Arc B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, belonging to the Arc Graphics-M generation. It is built on a 3 nm process at Intel with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The LX ULTRA has no base or boost clock recorded. The Arc B370 integrates 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. The LX ULTRA packs 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no RT core count listed. The LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3, while the Arc B370 supports Vulkan 1.4. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The Arc B370 is an integrated GPU with an IGP bus interface, meaning it has no slot width, no power connectors, and no separate memory. The LX ULTRA is a dual-slot discrete card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, a single 16-pin power connector, and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Arc B370's display outputs depend on the portable device it is built into. The LX ULTRA has fixed dimensions of 268 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width. The Arc B370 has no dimensions recorded.

Specification Differences

The LX ULTRA leads in every compute and memory specification. It has 6144 shading units versus 1280, 192 TMUs versus 40, and 96 ROPs versus 20. Its pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 49.15 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS. The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc B370 has no dedicated memory; it uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The LX ULTRA's memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The Arc B370 has a 3 nm process at Intel, while the LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Arc B370 has a 25 W TDP, while the LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP. The LX ULTRA requires a 550 W suggested PSU and uses a 16-pin power connector. The Arc B370 has no power connectors. The LX ULTRA is dual-slot with PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Arc B370 is an IGP. The LX ULTRA has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs; the Arc B370's outputs are portable device dependent. The Arc B370 has 10 RT cores; the LX ULTRA has none listed. The Arc B370 supports Vulkan 1.4; the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz; the LX ULTRA has no clock speeds recorded. The Arc B370 was released on 2026-01-26, and the LX ULTRA on 2026-03-16.