Intel Arc B370 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a single benchmark result for the Intel Arc B370, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scores 1184 points. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which limits direct numerical comparison. However, the Intel Arc B370's position relative to its nearest rivals provides context. The Arc B370 sits 0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, which scores 1186, and 0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190. It is 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, which scores 1192. The only rival it leads is the AMD FirePro M2000, which scores 1168, placing the Arc B370 1.4% ahead.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, by contrast, lacks any recorded scores, so its head-to-head performance cannot be quantified from the database. The Intel Arc B370 holds a 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs, indicating that most recorded graphics processors outperform it. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 holds a 50th percentile ranking, which places it at the median of the database's GPU distribution, though this percentile is based on no direct benchmark score.

The pixel and texture throughput figures reveal the scale of the gap. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, while the Intel Arc B370 delivers 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. That gives the LX 7G100 four times the pixel fill rate and four times the texture fill rate on paper, though these are specification-derived rates rather than measured benchmark outcomes. The LX 7G100 also claims 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute against 6.144 TFLOPS for the Arc B370, a fourfold difference in raw floating-point throughput. FP16 performance follows the same pattern, with the LX 7G100 at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS for the Arc B370.

Neither part has wins recorded in the head-to-head section, and both have zero wins in the wins tally. The absence of benchmark entries for the LX 7G100 means the database cannot confirm whether its theoretical advantages translate into real-world test results. The Arc B370's single score, while modest, is at least measured.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B370 wins in portability and power restraint. Its TDP is 25 W, it uses an IGP slot width, requires no power connectors, and its display outputs are portable device dependent. This makes it suitable for compact, low-power systems where dedicated power cabling is unavailable. Its 3 nm process node, fabricated by Intel, contributes to a relatively small electrical footprint. The Arc B370 also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with the Vulkan version being newer than the LX 7G100's 1.3 support.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in raw specification categories. It has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, versus 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs for the Arc B370. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, whereas the Arc B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The LX 7G100 also includes 10 ray tracing cores on the Intel part, though the Lisuan Tech listing does not specify RT core count.

The LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm TSMC process and a 225 W TDP with a dual-slot cooler and a single 8-pin power connector. Its suggested PSU is 550 W. It has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the Arc B370 uses an integrated graphics path with no bus interface beyond IGP. Memory clock speed for the LX 7G100 is listed as 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate. The Arc B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, while the LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock listed.

The Arc B370's only measured benchmark score places it at the 5th percentile, meaning it outperforms only a small fraction of the database's tracked GPUs. The LX 7G100's 50th percentile, despite lacking a score, suggests the database ranks it near the middle of the field based on its specification profile.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, belonging to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. The process nodes differ: Intel fabricates the Arc B370 on a 3 nm node, while TSMC fabricates the LX 7G100 on a 6 nm node. The foundry for the Arc B370 is Intel itself; the foundry for the LX 7G100 is TSMC.

The Intel part integrates graphics into the processor package, as indicated by its IGP bus interface and system shared memory. The Lisuan Tech part is a discrete card with dedicated GDDR6 memory. The LX 7G100 has no listed ray tracing cores, while the Arc B370 has 10. Neither part lists tensor cores, and both have unknown transistor counts and die sizes.

API support differs in one respect: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the Arc B370 supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. The LX 7G100's memory subsystem is entirely separate, using 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, while the Arc B370 shares system memory with bandwidth described as system dependent.

The LX 7G100's texture and pixel rates are derived from its higher TMU and ROP counts. Its 192 TMUs produce 384.0 GTexel/s, and its 96 ROPs produce 192.0 GPixel/s. The Arc B370's 40 TMUs and 20 ROPs yield 96.00 GTexel/s and 48.00 GPixel/s. These are architectural consequences of the different shading and rasterization resources.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across nearly every specification field where data exists. The Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Arc B370 lists 10 RT cores; the LX 7G100 lists none. FP32 compute is 6.144 TFLOPS for the Arc B370 and 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX 7G100. FP16 compute is 12.29 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS, both at a 2:1 ratio.

Memory configuration is entirely different. The Arc B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, while the LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6, a 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX 7G100's memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The Arc B370's base clock is 300 MHz with a 2400 MHz boost; the LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock recorded.

Power and cooling differ sharply. The Arc B370 has a 25 W TDP, an IGP slot width, and no power connectors. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, a dual-slot width, one 8-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The LX 7G100 is 294 mm long, 120 mm high, and 49 mm wide. The Arc B370 has no dimensions listed.

Display outputs also differ: the Arc B370 uses portable device dependent outputs, while the LX 7G100 has four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. The bus interface is IGP for the Arc B370 and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX 7G100. Release dates show the Arc B370 arriving on 2026-01-26 and the LX 7G100 on 2026-06-17. Both list production status as active, and neither has a launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher measured benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its measured performance cannot be compared.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370 scores 0.2% below the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, 0.5% below the ATI Radeon HD 5770, 0.7% below the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, and 1.4% above the AMD FirePro M2000.

Q: What memory does each GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the TDP and power requirements for each?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a 25 W TDP, an IGP slot width, and no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, a dual-slot design, one 8-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Intel Arc B370 has 1280 shading units and 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

Q: What process nodes and foundries are used?

A: The Intel Arc B370 uses a 3 nm node fabricated by Intel. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm node fabricated by TSMC.

Q: How do the percentile rankings differ?

A: The Intel Arc B370 ranks at the 5th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 ranks at the 50th percentile, though it has no direct benchmark score recorded.