Intel Arc B370 vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark data splits cleanly between these two Intel graphics parts. The Intel Arc Pro B60 wins the only head-to-head benchmark in the database, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, with a score of 2646 against 1184 for the Intel Arc B370. That is a 55.3 percent advantage for the Pro B60, a decisive margin in a modern DirectX 12 workload.

The Intel Arc B370 does not win any of the recorded benchmark comparisons. Its single score of 1184 places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the database include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 with an average score of 1186 (0.2 percent ahead), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190 (0.5 percent ahead), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M at 1192 (0.7 percent ahead), and the AMD FirePro M2000 at 1168 (1.4 percent behind). The B370 sits essentially at parity with these older mobile and entry-level desktop parts, within a narrow band of roughly one percent in either direction.

For the Intel Arc Pro B60, the benchmark suite is more extensive. Beyond the Steel Nomad result, the database records eight Passmark tests. The G3D score is 14580, the G2D score is 763, and the GPU compute score is 7029. DirectX-specific Passmark results show 179 for DirectX 9, 122 for DirectX 11, 76 for DirectX 12, and 61 for DirectX 10. The average benchmark score across all recorded tests for the Pro B60 is 3182, placing it in the 20th percentile of all GPUs.

The Pro B60's nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with an average score of 3163 (0.6 percent behind), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 at 3210 (0.9 percent ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce 920M at 3287 (3.2 percent ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER at 3075 (3.5 percent behind). This clustering suggests the Pro B60's average score straddles a wide range of NVIDIA parts, from a professional workstation card to an entry-level desktop GPU to a modern high-end RTX series card.

The use-case split is therefore straightforward. The Arc B370 is a low-power integrated graphics solution for portable devices, and its benchmark position confirms it targets basic 3D acceleration rather than demanding workloads. The Arc Pro B60 is a discrete, dual-slot professional card with a much higher performance ceiling, and the data shows it dominating the single shared benchmark while also offering a broader set of measurable capabilities across different DirectX versions and compute tasks.

The Verdict

The data indicates two very different products with distinct intended roles. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the clear performance leader in every measurable comparison where both parts appear. Its 2646 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 more than doubles the B370's 1184, and its Passmark results show strength across DirectX 9, 11, and 12 along with dedicated G2D and compute tests. The Pro B60 sits in the 20th percentile of all GPUs, which is a modest position overall but far above the B370's 5th percentile.

The Intel Arc B370, by contrast, is an integrated graphics processor with no discrete memory, no power connectors, and a 25 W power envelope. Its benchmark results place it alongside integrated and entry-level discrete GPUs from roughly a decade ago. The closest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, just 0.2 percent higher. This is not a part designed for high frame rates or heavy compute; the data shows it as a capable basic graphics solution for portable systems.

For users selecting between these two, the decision is defined by the platform. The B370 is an IGP, meaning it is built into a processor and cannot be installed as a separate card. The Pro B60 is a dual-slot, PCIe 5.0 x8 card with a 167 mm length and a 550 W suggested PSU. The Pro B60 also carries a launch MSRP of 499 USD. The B370 has no launch MSRP recorded.

The verdict from the benchmark data: the Arc Pro B60 delivers roughly 2.2 times the Steel Nomad performance of the B370, offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory versus system-shared memory, and provides four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The Arc B370 is for compact, low-power portable devices where its 25 W draw and integrated nature are the primary attributes. The Pro B60 is for desktop systems needing professional-grade performance, memory capacity, and multi-display output.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains exactly one direct comparison between the Intel Arc B370 and the Intel Arc Pro B60: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The Pro B60 scores 2646, while the B370 scores 1184. The delta percentage is recorded as -55.3 percent from the perspective of the B370, meaning the B370 trails by more than half. In absolute terms, the Pro B60 is 1462 points ahead.

This single result is informative because Steel Nomad is a modern DirectX 12 workload that stresses shading, texture, and rasterization throughput. The Pro B60's advantage here aligns with its broader hardware resources. It has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 80 raster output units, and 20 ray tracing cores. The B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. The Pro B60 has exactly double the shading units and double the RT cores, but four times the TMUs and four times the ROPs. That explains why the performance gap is larger than a simple 2:1 ratio might suggest.

The pixel rate for the Pro B60 is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s for the B370, a 4:1 difference. The texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s, also 4:1. The FP32 compute is 12.29 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS, a 2:1 difference. The recorded benchmark delta of 55.3 percent fits between these ratios, indicating that the Steel Nomad test is sensitive to both compute and memory bandwidth.

The Pro B60 also benefits from dedicated GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The B370 uses system-shared memory with bandwidth listed as system dependent. In a memory-intensive benchmark like Steel Nomad, this difference is substantial. The B370's memory type and bus width are both listed as system shared, meaning performance depends heavily on the host system's memory configuration, which is not a fixed quantity in the database.

The only other benchmark data for the B370 is that single Steel Nomad result. The Pro B60 has additional Passmark scores, but those have no B370 counterpart, so no direct comparison is possible. The Passmark G3D score of 14580 for the Pro B60 is its strongest relative result, while the DirectX 10 score of 61 is the weakest. This indicates the Pro B60 performs best in overall 3D graphics and compute workloads, with more varied results across specific legacy DirectX APIs.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark score in the shared 3DMark Steel Nomad test?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 2646, while the Intel Arc B370 scores 1184. The Pro B60 leads by 55.3 percent.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The B370 is within one percent of several older GPUs. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is 0.2 percent faster, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 is 0.5 percent faster, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7 percent faster, and the AMD FirePro M2000 is 1.4 percent slower.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc B370 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for the Intel Arc Pro B60?

A: The Pro B60 has a 200 W TDP, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU rating of 550 W. It is a dual-slot card measuring 167 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

Q: Does the Intel Arc B370 require a power connector?

A: No. The B370 has no power connectors and a 25 W TDP. It is an integrated graphics processor with an IGP slot width and IGP bus interface.

Q: What display outputs does the Intel Arc Pro B60 provide?

A: The Pro B60 has four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The B370's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different Intel architectures and manufacturing processes. The Intel Arc B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation built on the Panther Lake chip. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The Intel Arc Pro B60 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series generation built on the BMG-G21 chip. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The B60's die measures 272 mm² and contains 19,600 million transistors, with a transistor density of 72.1 million per mm². The B370's transistor count and die size are unknown.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The Pro B60 has a base clock of 2000 MHz and the same 2400 MHz boost clock. The memory clock for the Pro B60 is 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective data rate. The B370's memory clock is listed as system shared. The Pro B60's much higher base clock contributes to its performance advantage in sustained workloads, while the B370's low base clock suggests aggressive power management for portable operation.

Compute resources scale unevenly between the two. The Pro B60 has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 RT cores. The B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. The shading units and RT cores are exactly double, but the TMUs and ROPs are quadruple. The Pro B60's pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s, both four times the B370's 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 12.29 TFLOPS for the Pro B60 and 6.144 TFLOPS for the B370. FP16 compute is 24.58 TFLOPS for the Pro B60 and 12.29 TFLOPS for the B370, both at a 2:1 ratio.

Memory architecture is a major differentiator. The Pro B60 uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s. The B370 relies on system-shared memory with a system-shared bus width and system-dependent bandwidth. This means the B370's memory performance is not fixed and depends on the host platform's memory subsystem. For a GPU, this is a fundamental limitation in bandwidth-bound workloads.

Physical and interface differences are pronounced. The Pro B60 is a dual-slot card with a 200 W TDP, one 8-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, and a PCIe 5.0 x8 bus interface. It measures 167 mm by 69 mm by 40 mm. The B370 is an IGP with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and an IGP bus interface. It has no recorded dimensions. The Pro B60 provides four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the B370's outputs depend on the portable device.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither lists tensor cores. The Pro B60 was released on September 4, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 499 USD. The B370 was released on January 26, 2026, and has no recorded launch MSRP. Both are listed as active production parts. The Pro B60's architecture is designed for discrete professional workloads, while the B370's architecture targets integrated mobile graphics with minimal power draw.