Intel Arc B370 vs Intel Arc Graphics 24EU Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a single direct comparison between the Intel Arc B370 and the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU, using the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. In this benchmark, the Intel Arc B370 scores 1184 points, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU scores 733 points. This produces a delta of 61.5% in favor of the Arc B370, making it the clear winner in the only head-to-head measurement available.

The magnitude of this difference is substantial. A 61.5% advantage in a single synthetic workload indicates that the Arc B370 delivers significantly higher graphics throughput in this specific DX12 scenario. The Arc Graphics 24EU trails by a wide margin, and its score of 733 places it far behind the Arc B370's 1184.

Context from the nearest rivals reinforces this gap. The Arc B370's average benchmark score of 1184 sits within a narrow band of comparable GPUs. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 averages 1186, a delta of -0.2% relative to the Arc B370, meaning the Arc B370 is essentially tied with that older mobile part. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 averages 1190, putting the Arc B370 0.5% behind it. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M averages 1192, 0.7% ahead of the Arc B370. Conversely, the AMD FirePro M2000 averages 1168, which is 1.4% behind the Arc B370. These tight margins, all within roughly 1.5 percentage points, show that the Arc B370's performance is closely clustered with these legacy discrete GPUs, despite being an integrated graphics solution.

The Arc Graphics 24EU tells a different story. Its average score of 733 places it in a lower performance tier. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU, both of which average exactly 733 points, producing a delta of 0%. This indicates that, at least in this benchmark, the 24EU, 32EU, and 64EU variants of the Arc Graphics series deliver identical results, despite having different execution unit counts. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M averages 723 points, which is 1.4% behind the 24EU, while the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M averages 751 points, putting it 2.4% ahead of the 24EU. The Arc Graphics 24EU therefore sits in a cluster of very low-end parts, with performance comparable to decade-old discrete mobile GPUs.

The percentile data further separates the two. The Arc B370 ranks in the 5th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the Arc Graphics 24EU ranks in the 3rd percentile. Although both are low-ranking parts overall, the two-percentile gap reflects the meaningful performance difference measured in the head-to-head test.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and are built for different platform roles. The Intel Arc B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture and is part of the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation, built on a 3 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses the Xe-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics (Arrow Lake) generation, also on a 3 nm process node but fabricated by TSMC. Both architectures are modern, but they represent distinct design iterations within Intel's integrated graphics roadmap.

The chip-level details differ considerably. The Arc B370 is based on the Panther Lake chip, while the Arc Graphics 24EU is based on the Arrow Lake-S chip. The Arc Graphics 24EU's chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 73.3M per mm². The Arc B370's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, so no direct comparison of physical dimensions is possible.

Execution unit counts diverge sharply. The Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 render output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. The Arc Graphics 24EU has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 6 render output units, with no ray tracing cores listed. This means the Arc B370 offers roughly 6.7 times the shading units, 3.3 times the TMUs, and 3.3 times the ROPs of the Arc Graphics 24EU. The presence of ray tracing cores on the Arc B370, with none recorded for the Arc Graphics 24EU, is a functional differentiator for workloads that utilize ray tracing.

The clock speeds also favor the Arc B370. Both GPUs have a base clock of 300 MHz, but the Arc B370 boosts to 2400 MHz, while the Arc Graphics 24EU boosts to 2000 MHz. The 400 MHz boost advantage for the Arc B370 contributes to its higher throughput, although the execution unit disparity is the dominant factor.

Memory configurations are identical in structure: both use system shared memory with a system shared bus width and system dependent bandwidth. Neither GPU has dedicated VRAM. The Arc B370's pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The Arc Graphics 24EU's pixel rate is 12.00 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 24.00 GTexel/s. The Arc B370 thus delivers 4 times the pixel fill rate and 4 times the texture fill rate of the Arc Graphics 24EU.

Compute throughput follows the same pattern. The Arc B370 achieves 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 12.29 TFLOPS of FP16 performance with a 2:1 ratio. The Arc Graphics 24EU achieves 768.0 GFLOPS of FP32 performance and 1.536 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, also with a 2:1 ratio. The Arc B370 delivers 8 times the FP32 compute and 8 times the FP16 compute of the Arc Graphics 24EU.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the Intel Arc B370 for any workload where graphics performance matters. Its 1184 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 is 61.5% higher than the Arc Graphics 24EU's 733, and its 5th percentile ranking versus the 3rd percentile ranking confirms a higher standing in the overall GPU distribution. The Arc B370 also brings ray tracing cores, which the Arc Graphics 24EU lacks entirely, along with substantially higher fill rates and compute throughput.

The Arc Graphics 24EU is the weaker part in every measured dimension, but the database shows it sits in a performance cluster with the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 64EU, all scoring exactly 733. This suggests that for this particular benchmark, the 24EU's lower execution unit count does not penalize it relative to its higher-EU siblings. Its nearest discrete rivals, the AMD Radeon HD 6470M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M, are within a few percentage points, indicating that the Arc Graphics 24EU delivers performance comparable to older entry-level mobile discrete GPUs.

For users with a system based on the Panther Lake platform, the Arc B370 is the stronger integrated graphics option according to the recorded data. For users with an Arrow Lake-S platform, the Arc Graphics 24EU is the available integrated solution, and its performance level is what the data shows. The choice between the two is therefore dictated by the host platform rather than by preference, since both are integrated GPUs tied to their respective chips.

Specification Differences

The following table lists only the fields where the two GPUs differ, based on the database records.

| Field | Intel Arc B370 | Intel Arc Graphics 24EU |

|-------|---------------|------------------------|

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | Xe-LPG |

| Generation | Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) | Arc Graphics (Arrow Lake) |

| Chip | Panther Lake | Arrow Lake-S |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | unknown | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | unknown | 243 mm² |

| Transistor Density | null | 73.3M / mm² |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Shading Units | 1280 | 192 |

| TMUs | 40 | 12 |

| ROPs | 20 | 6 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 10 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 12.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 24.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 6.144 TFLOPS | 768.0 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 1.536 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 65 W |

| Power Connectors | None | null |

| Bus Interface | IGP | Ring Bus |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | Motherboard Dependent |

| Release Date | 2026-01-26 | 2024-10-23 |

| Predecessor | null | HD Graphics |

Fields not listed above, such as base clock (300 MHz for both), memory type (System Shared for both), DirectX support (12 Ultimate (12_2) for both), OpenGL support (4.6 for both), Vulkan support (1.4 for both), and slot width (IGP for both), are identical between the two GPUs.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark score in the head-to-head test?

A: The Intel Arc B370 scores 1184 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU scores 733. The Arc B370 wins by 61.5%.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370's average score of 1184 is 0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186), 0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190), 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192), and 1.4% ahead of the AMD FirePro M2000 (1168).

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and Intel Arc Graphics 64EU both average 733 points, matching the 24EU exactly. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M averages 723 (1.4% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M averages 751 (2.4% ahead).

Q: Do the two GPUs use the same architecture?

A: No. The Intel Arc B370 uses Xe3-LPG architecture, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses Xe-LPG architecture. Both are built on a 3 nm process, but the B370 uses Intel's foundry and the 24EU uses TSMC.

Q: How do the shading unit counts differ?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has 192 shading units. The B370 also has 40 TMUs and 20 ROPs, compared to 12 TMUs and 6 ROPs on the 24EU.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU have ray tracing cores?

A: No. The database lists no ray tracing cores for the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU. The Intel Arc B370 has 10 ray tracing cores.