GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 880M

CORE STATE Strix Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A750

CORE STATE DG2-512
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 225 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
535
2,612
geekbench_opencl
31,285
98,554
geekbench_vulkan
40,006
85,631
passmark_directx_10
31
65
passmark_directx_11
73
72
passmark_directx_12
32
70
passmark_directx_9
97
181
passmark_g2d
969
732
passmark_g3d
7,615
12,534
passmark_gpu_compute
3,719
5,368

Analysis: AMD Radeon 880M vs Intel Arc A750

For this graphics card matchup, Arc A750 proves its leadership obviously. If you're streaming at 4K, Arc A750 consistently exceeds the AMD Radeon 880M by significant gaps. This frame rate difference grows especially greater at higher quality levels. This GPU processes intensive games with capability. Its architectural advantages are evident.

Game performance tests over multiple titles steadily support Arc A750. From multiplayer titles to blockbuster games, Arc A750 maintains its edge. This frame rate steadiness over multiple scenarios shows fundamental architectural improvements. Gamers will count on strong performance irrespective of game type. The flexibility is outstanding.

Gaming results throughout various titles consistently advantage Arc A750. From esports genres to blockbuster titles, Arc A750 keeps its superiority. This frame rate consistency over various workloads proves fundamental architectural improvements. Gamers might count on excellent performance no matter of game type. This flexibility is notable.

When those facing a buying determination, Arc A750 stands as the suggested pick. Its steady gaming lead over the AMD Radeon 880M establishes it the better investment for performance-oriented consumers. Evaluate your particular workloads, though the benchmarks points toward Arc A750. Make an educated choice. This frame rate difference is measurable and meaningful.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
880M
A750
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
3,584 +366.7%
Shaders
768
3,584 +366.7%
TMUs
48
224 +366.7%
ROPs
16
112 +600.0%
Compute Units
12
Execution Units
448
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
512.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
46.40 GPixel/s
268.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
139.2 GTexel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS
17.20 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
278.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
2.150 TFLOPS (1:8)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS (1:1)
34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
28 +133.3%
XMX Cores
448
Power
TDP
15 W
225 W
TDP (W)
15
225 +1400.0%
Suggested PSU
550 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Strix Point
DG2-512
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
Alchemist (Arc 7)
Process Size
4 nm
6 nm
Transistors
34,000 million
21,700 million
Die Size
233 mm²
406 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
145.9M / mm²
53.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
289 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
Xe Graphics
Successor
Battlemage
View Radeon 880M Details View Arc A750 Details