Intel Arc A570M vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not contain any direct head-to-head benchmark runs between the Intel Arc A570M and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The database shows no shared test results for these two products. The Arc A570M has a single recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, placing it in the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores, registering an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile standing.

Because the LX 7G100 lacks any measured performance data, a direct numeric comparison of application performance is not possible. The Arc A570M's nearest rivals in the database are all desktop-class GPUs with similar OpenCL scores. It sits 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (average score 58392), 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (average score 58085), 0.5% behind the NVIDIA P102-100 (average score 58528), and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (average score 58657). These delta percentages indicate that the Arc A570M's measured compute performance is tightly clustered with a wide range of desktop cards, despite being a mobile integrated graphics solution.

The absence of head-to-head results means the benchmark database cannot confirm which product delivers higher frame rates or faster compute throughput. The LX 7G100's theoretical specifications are substantially higher, but no measured data supports a performance claim.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc A570M uses the DG2-256 chip built on Intel's Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist generation within the Arc 5 Mobile lineup. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip built on a "TrueGPU" architecture from the 7G100 generation. It is also fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The compute configurations diverge sharply. The Arc A570M provides 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 scales up to 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but the database lists no ray tracing cores for it. The LX 7G100's FP32 throughput is rated at 24.58 TFLOPS with FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The Arc A570M delivers 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). That places the LX 7G100 at roughly 4.6 times the FP32 compute rate of the Arc A570M on paper.

Memory architecture also differs. The Arc A570M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, nearly double the Arc's memory bandwidth.

API support shows a slight difference. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc A570M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Physical and power characteristics differ considerably. The Arc A570M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 75 W TDP and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot discrete card measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width, with a 225 W TDP, a single 8-pin power connector, a suggested 550 W power supply, and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Arc A570M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the LX 7G100 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher recorded benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so no comparison is possible.

Q: How does the Arc A570M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A570M is 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392), 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085), 0.5% behind the NVIDIA P102-100 (58528), and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657).

Q: What is the memory capacity and bandwidth difference?

A: The Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same API levels?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc A570M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Arc A570M has a 75 W TDP and is an integrated graphics processor. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and lists a suggested 550 W power supply.

Q: Which card has ray tracing cores?

A: The Intel Arc A570M includes 16 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 lists no ray tracing cores in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc A570M | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | DG2-256 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 6 nm (TSMC) | 6 nm (TSMC) |

| Transistors | 11,500 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 269 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 42.8M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 900 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 166.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 5.325 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | null | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | null | 294 mm x 120 mm x 49 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-07-31 | 2026-06-17 |

| Benchmark Score | 58239 | 0 |

| Percentile | 88 | 50 |

The Verdict

The two GPUs occupy opposite ends of the mobile versus desktop spectrum. The Intel Arc A570M is an integrated processor with a 75 W TDP, designed for portable devices where space and power are constrained. It has a verified benchmark score of 58239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, and its measured performance clusters within 0.7% of desktop cards like the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, NVIDIA P102-100, and AMD Radeon PRO V710.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a large dual-slot desktop card with a 225 W TDP, 294 mm length, and a required 550 W power supply. Its specifications indicate a much higher theoretical compute ceiling: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 12 GB of VRAM. However, the database contains zero measured benchmark results for this card. Its 50th percentile rating and average score of 0 reflect the absence of data rather than actual performance.

For users who rely on recorded measurements, the Arc A570M is the only option with verifiable performance. For users who prioritize raw specification counts, the LX 7G100 holds a decisive numerical advantage across every compute and memory metric. The data cannot confirm whether the LX 7G100's specifications translate into real-world wins, because no benchmarks exist.

Where Each One Wins

Intel Arc A570M wins on verified performance and efficiency. The database records a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 for this card, placing it in the 88th percentile. Its 75 W TDP is one-third of the LX 7G100's 225 W TDP. It supports Vulkan 1.4, one version newer than the LX 7G100's Vulkan 1.3. It also includes 16 ray tracing cores, a feature absent from the LX 7G100's specification list. Its compact integrated form factor suits portable devices with no external power connector requirement.

Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins on theoretical specification superiority. Every compute and memory metric favors this card: 6144 shading units versus 2048, 192 TMUs versus 128, 96 ROPs versus 64, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 5.325 TFLOPS, 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 versus 10.65 TFLOPS, 12 GB VRAM versus 8 GB, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 224.0 GB/s. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is more than double the Arc A570M's 83.20 GPixel/s, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is similarly ahead of 166.4 GTexel/s. It uses a wider PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for multi-monitor setups.

The LX 7G100 also launches later, with a release date of 2026-06-17 compared to the Arc A570M's 2023-07-31. Its 294 mm length and dual-slot width define it as a full desktop expansion card, while the Arc A570M's portable-device-dependent outputs tie it to a specific laptop or compact system design. The LX 7G100's 18 Gbps effective memory speed exceeds the Arc A570M's 14 Gbps effective speed, and its 550 W suggested power supply indicates a high-power desktop build.

Neither card has a recorded direct benchmark comparison, so the division of wins rests on either measured data (favoring the Arc A570M) or listed specifications (favoring the LX 7G100). The Arc A570M is the only one of the two with a non-zero average benchmark score and a percentile ranking based on actual test results.