Intel Arc A530M vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Arc A530M and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The database contains no matching test entries for these two GPUs in the same workload. However, the Intel Arc A530M has two individual benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has none. The Arc A530M scores 49,735 points in Geekbench OpenCL and 43,492 points in Geekbench Vulkan, giving it an average benchmark score of 46,614. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0 due to the absence of any recorded measurements.

The Intel Arc A530M sits at the 85th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at 46,601 points, which is a 0% delta, the AMD Radeon RX 6550M at 46,702 points, which is 0.2% faster, and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 at 46,043 points, which is 1.2% slower. The NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45,972 points, putting it 1.4% behind the Arc A530M. These narrow margins indicate the Arc A530M clusters tightly with its direct competitors in aggregate performance. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, by contrast, holds the 50th percentile with no benchmark entries, meaning its actual performance position cannot be established from the database.

The Arc A530M delivers a 0.2% deficit against the RX 6550M and a 1.2% advantage over the RTX A2000. The data confirms that the Arc A530M performs within a 1.6 percentage-point band across all four nearest rivals, from 1.4% ahead of the RTX 5880 Ada Generation to 0.2% behind the RX 6550M. Because the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no measured scores, no mathematical comparison can be drawn between the two cards in this section.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use different architectures, chips, and design philosophies. The Intel Arc A530M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-256 chip, part of the Alchemist generation within the Arc 5 Mobile lineup. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G105 chip, belonging to the 7G100 generation. Both are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the similarities end there.

The Arc A530M contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 42.8 million transistors per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO does not report transistor count, die size, or density in the database, so those physical characteristics remain unquantified.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a 225 W TDP and a dual-slot cooler with a single 16-pin power connector, while the Intel Arc A530M is rated at 65 W TDP and is listed as an IGP form factor, meaning it is intended for integration rather than as a discrete add-in card. The LX PRO also specifies a 550 W suggested power supply, whereas the Arc A530M has no suggested PSU listing. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The Arc A530M has no physical dimensions recorded.

The memory subsystems differ substantially. The Arc A530M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with a memory clock of 1750 MHz and 14 Gbps effective data rate, producing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with a 2250 MHz memory clock and 18 Gbps effective data rate, producing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That gives the LX PRO nearly double the bandwidth and three times the memory capacity.

The compute configurations diverge sharply. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The Arc A530M has 1,536 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The LX PRO therefore quadruples the shading unit count and doubles both TMUs and ROPs. The Arc A530M includes 12 ray tracing cores; the LX PRO reports no ray tracing core count. Neither GPU lists tensor cores.

The interface and display outputs also differ. The Arc A530M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and lists its display outputs as portable device dependent. The LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc A530M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

The release dates are far apart. The Arc A530M launched on 2023-07-31, while the LX PRO launched on 2026-03-16. Both are marked as active in production.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc A530M wins in the only category with actual measured data: benchmark scores. Its Geekbench OpenCL result of 49,735 and Vulkan result of 43,492 place it at the 85th percentile, and its average score of 46,614 allows direct comparison against four nearest rivals. This makes the Arc A530M the only one of the two with verified performance data, and its placement among the RX 5600M, RX 6550M, RTX A2000, and RTX 5880 Ada Generation shows it is competitive in the mid-range mobile GPU space.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in raw specifications. Its 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is roughly six times the Arc A530M's 3.994 TFLOPS. Its FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) compares to 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Arc A530M. The LX PRO's pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s triples the Arc A530M's 62.40 GPixel/s, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s triples the Arc A530M's 124.8 GTexel/s. The LX PRO also carries 24 GB of memory versus 8 GB, a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit, and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus 224.0 GB/s.

The LX PRO wins on memory capacity and bandwidth, which matters for workloads that exceed the 8 GB frame buffer of the Arc A530M. The LX PRO also provides a wider PCIe interface at x16 versus x8, and its four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs give it a fixed multi-monitor configuration, whereas the Arc A530M's outputs depend on the portable device it is integrated into.

The power envelope favors the Arc A530M. At 65 W, it consumes far less than the LX PRO's 225 W. The Arc A530M also requires no external power connector, while the LX PRO needs a 16-pin connector and a 550 W power supply. For systems where power delivery is constrained, the Arc A530M is the more practical part, although the database does not include efficiency measurements to quantify the trade-off.

Specification Differences

The table below covers only the fields where the two GPUs differ according to the database.

| Specification | Intel Arc A530M | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | DG2-256 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) | 7G100 |

| Transistors | 11,500 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 269 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 42.8M / mm² | null |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1536 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 96 | 192 |

| ROPs | 48 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 12 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 62.40 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 3.994 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 65 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | null | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | null | 248 mm, 118 mm, 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-07-31 | 2026-03-16 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 46614 | 0 |

| Percentile | 85 | 50 |

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Arc A530M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A530M has an average benchmark score of 46,614. It is 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6550M, 0% different from the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, 1.2% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A2000, and 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any benchmark results?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the LX PRO, and its average benchmark score is 0. Its percentile of 50 is recorded but not supported by any measured test data.

Q: Which GPU has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc A530M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 compute differences?

A: The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32, while the Arc A530M delivers 3.994 TFLOPS. The LX PRO also reaches 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 versus 7.987 TFLOPS for the Arc A530M.

Q: What are the power requirements of each GPU?

A: The Arc A530M has a 65 W TDP and is an IGP with no power connector listed. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, uses a dual-slot design with a 1x 16-pin connector, and lists a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The Intel Arc A530M supports Vulkan 1.4. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The Verdict

The database presents two very different products. The Intel Arc A530M is a measured, verified GPU with an average score of 46,614 and an 85th percentile ranking. It competes within a narrow band around the RX 5600M, RX 6550M, RTX A2000, and RTX 5880 Ada Generation. Its 65 W TDP, IGP form factor, and lack of external power connectors make it a low-power integrated option. Its 8 GB memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest, but its benchmark position is confirmed.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a specification-heavy card with no measured performance. It offers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 24 GB of GDDR6, 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and a 192-bit bus, all of which vastly exceed the Arc A530M's specifications. It also requires 225 W, a 16-pin power connector, and a 550 W power supply. Its 50th percentile ranking is recorded without benchmark support, so its real-world position cannot be verified.

The choice depends on what the data can support. For a GPU with confirmed benchmark results and a known competitive position, the Intel Arc A530M is the only part with evidence. For a GPU with far larger compute and memory resources on paper, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO offers the higher raw specification ceiling, but no measured scores exist to validate it. The Arc A530M is the safer analytical choice because its performance is documented. The LX PRO is the higher-spec alternative whose actual performance remains unmeasured in the database.