GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A370M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 35 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A4500

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 20 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz
TDP 200 W
BUS WIDTH 320 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
29,676
141,837
geekbench_vulkan
28,673
129,980
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
3,196

Analysis: Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

For this graphics card showdown, NVIDIA RTX A4500 (NVIDIA) demonstrates its dominance obviously. If you're rendering at 4K, NVIDIA RTX A4500 (NVIDIA) steadily outperforms the Arc A370M by notable margins. The speed gap grows even more at elevated quality levels. The video card executes heavy scenarios with ease. Its engineering benefits are evident.

When it comes to real-time ray tracing, NVIDIA RTX A4500 (NVIDIA) leaps further beyond of the Arc A370M. Its specialized cores handle heavy lighting effects far more smoothly. Enthusiasts demanding next-gen graphics might certainly consider NVIDIA RTX A4500 (NVIDIA). The RT performance is significant. Current titles continually leverage hardware RT features.

the Arc A370M encounters issues to keep up with NVIDIA RTX A4500 (NVIDIA)'s absolute capability. For value-focused consumers, the Arc A370M could nevertheless represent adequate results, but those wanting the best quality should lean toward NVIDIA RTX A4500 (NVIDIA). The frame rate difference is too considerable to ignore. Heavy titles notably highlight this gap. This investment pays returns in capability.

Overall, NVIDIA RTX A4500 (NVIDIA) offers the stronger selection in this evaluation. Its performance advantages warrant examination for buyers putting together a powerful rendering PC. Though the Arc A370M offers its advantages, this benchmark numbers definitely supports NVIDIA RTX A4500 (NVIDIA). Base your selection based on this. The frame rate margin is substantial sufficiently to impact.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A370M
RTX A4500
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
7,168 +600.0%
Shaders
1,024
7,168 +600.0%
TMUs
64
224 +250.0%
ROPs
32
96 +200.0%
SM Count
56
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
1550 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1650 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
20 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
20,480 +400.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
320 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
640.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
6 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
158.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.198 TFLOPS
23.65 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
369.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
23.65 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
56 +600.0%
Tensor Cores
224
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
35 W
200 W
TDP (W)
35
200 +471.4%
Suggested PSU
550 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ampere
GPU Name
DG2-128
GA102
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
6 nm
8 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
28,300 million
Die Size
157 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
45.9M / mm²
45.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Arc A370M Details View RTX A4500 Details