GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A370M

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz

TDP 35 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A2000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1687 MHz

TDP 95 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

29,676

56,518

geekbench_vulkan

28,673

53,146

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

115

passmark_g2d

N/A

491

passmark_g3d

N/A

9,611

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

4,334

Analysis: Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Examining the test data for NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and Intel's Arc A370M, a definite trend unfolds. NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile repeatedly delivers higher FPS in this evaluation. This performance superiority varies from considerable to impressive based on the individual game. Such steadiness points to underlying architectural superiority. Those seeking rendering power would take note.

For hardware ray tracing, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile pulls even more forward of Intel's Arc A370M. The hardware hardware execute complex reflection rendering significantly more efficiently. Users seeking premium visuals might strongly pick NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile. This hardware RT superiority is substantial. Current releases increasingly utilize RT capabilities.

When people considering a acquisition decision, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile stands as the advised option. The reliable benchmark superiority over Intel's Arc A370M establishes it the smarter choice for performance-oriented consumers. Weigh your individual use cases, but this benchmarks leads toward NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile. Form an wise determination. The frame rate gap is measurable and meaningful.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A370M

RTX A2000 Mobile

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,024

2,560 +150.0%

Shaders

1,024

2,560 +150.0%

TMUs

80 +25.0%

ROPs

48 +50.0%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

128

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1550 MHz

1215 MHz

Boost Clock

2050 MHz

1687 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

4,096 0.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

64 bit

128 bit

Bandwidth

112.0 GB/s

192.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

4 MB

2 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

65.60 GPixel/s

80.98 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

131.2 GTexel/s

135.0 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

4.198 TFLOPS

8.637 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)

135.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)

8.637 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

20 +150.0%

Tensor Cores

—

XMX Cores

128

—

Power

TDP

35 W

95 W

TDP (W)

95 +171.4%

Power Connectors

—

None

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Ampere

GPU Name

DG2-128

GA107

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)

Ampere-MW (Ax000)

Process Size

6 nm

8 nm

Transistors

7,200 million

8,700 million

Die Size

157 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

45.9M / mm²

43.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

—

Quadro Turing-M

Successor

—

Ada-MW

View Arc A370M Details View RTX A2000 Mobile Details

GPU Comparison

Intel Arc A370M

RTX A2000 Mobile

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons