GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz

TDP 25 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

CORE STATE AD107

VRAM 6 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1755 MHz

TDP 50 W

BUS WIDTH 96 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

24,546

74,748

geekbench_vulkan

24,747

75,235

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

130

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

184

passmark_g2d

N/A

633

passmark_g3d

N/A

14,423

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

5,947

Analysis: Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Visual performance benchmarks between NVIDIA RTX 4050 GPU and Intel Arc A350M graphics card demonstrate a obvious leader. NVIDIA RTX 4050 GPU delivers considerably higher performance throughout modern titles. The memory advantage and design enhancements convert into obviously enhanced rendering experiences. Score numbers supports this finding. Gamers demanding maximum visuals should pay attention.

This graphics memory superiority of NVIDIA RTX 4050 GPU gets progressively critical at elevated quality levels. High resolution gaming needs significant memory, and NVIDIA RTX 4050 GPU provides extra capability. The translates into better performance in demanding games. Next-gen games might progressively consume extra video memory. This advantage increases over releases.

The VRAM benefit of NVIDIA RTX 4050 GPU grows more relevant at increased resolutions. 4K gaming demands significant video memory, and NVIDIA RTX 4050 GPU has more buffer. The converts into smoother performance in demanding scenarios. Upcoming games might only require additional memory. This superiority widens over releases.

The bottom line: NVIDIA RTX 4050 GPU secures this matchup clearly. Users prioritizing graphics capability will strongly choose NVIDIA RTX 4050 GPU over Intel Arc A350M graphics card. The score data supports this recommendation. Your games should run noticeably better. This is a definite victor in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A350M

RTX 4050 Mobile

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

2,560 +233.3%

Shaders

768

2,560 +233.3%

TMUs

80 +66.7%

ROPs

48 +100.0%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1150 MHz

1455 MHz

Boost Clock

2200 MHz

1755 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

6 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

6,144 +50.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

64 bit

96 bit

Bandwidth

112.0 GB/s

192.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

4 MB

12 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

52.80 GPixel/s

84.24 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

105.6 GTexel/s

140.4 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

3.379 TFLOPS

8.986 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)

140.4 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)

8.986 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

20 +233.3%

Tensor Cores

—

XMX Cores

—

Power

TDP

25 W

50 W

TDP (W)

50 +100.0%

Power Connectors

—

None

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Ada Lovelace

GPU Name

DG2-128

AD107

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)

GeForce 40 Mobile

Process Size

6 nm

5 nm

Transistors

7,200 million

18,900 million

Die Size

157 mm²

159 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

45.9M / mm²

118.9M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.9

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Production

End-of-life

Active

Predecessor

—

GeForce 30 Mobile

Successor

—

GeForce 50 Mobile

View Arc A350M Details View GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Details