GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz

TDP 25 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 3070

CORE STATE GA104

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1725 MHz

TDP 220 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

24,546

112,783

geekbench_vulkan

24,747

21,022

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

3,162

passmark_directx_10

N/A

150

passmark_directx_11

N/A

182

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

247

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,001

passmark_g3d

N/A

22,214

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

11,195

Analysis: Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Gaming performance comparisons between NVIDIA RTX 3070 and Arc A350M from Intel indicate a obvious leader. NVIDIA RTX 3070 achieves significantly stronger frame rates over contemporary titles. This graphics memory benefit and technical advances lead into noticeably enhanced gaming quality. Performance data demonstrates this observation. Gamers wanting maximum frame rates would pay attention.

For hardware ray tracing, NVIDIA RTX 3070 jumps significantly ahead of Arc A350M from Intel. Its specialized units process complex global illumination effects far more effectively. Players wanting premium visuals might seriously favor NVIDIA RTX 3070. This ray tracing performance is substantial. Contemporary releases more and more leverage hardware RT features.

Arc A350M from Intel cannot be written off entirely, though the benchmark difference compared to NVIDIA RTX 3070 is tough to overlook. In price-aware builders, Arc A350M from Intel may still represent an option provided its smaller MSRP adjusts for its reduced capabilities. That said, when peak visual throughput, NVIDIA RTX 3070 represents the clear choice. The determination is evident. Performance seekers would move toward NVIDIA RTX 3070.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A350M

RTX 3070

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

5,888 +666.7%

Shaders

768

5,888 +666.7%

TMUs

184 +283.3%

ROPs

96 +300.0%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1150 MHz

1500 MHz

Boost Clock

2200 MHz

1725 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

8 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

8,192 +100.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

64 bit

256 bit

Bandwidth

112.0 GB/s

448.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

4 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

52.80 GPixel/s

165.6 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

105.6 GTexel/s

317.4 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

3.379 TFLOPS

20.31 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)

317.4 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)

20.31 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

46 +666.7%

Tensor Cores

—

184

XMX Cores

—

Power

TDP

25 W

220 W

TDP (W)

220 +780.0%

Suggested PSU

—

550 W

Power Connectors

—

1x 12-pin

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Ampere

GPU Name

DG2-128

GA104

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)

GeForce 30

Process Size

6 nm

8 nm

Transistors

7,200 million

17,400 million

Die Size

157 mm²

392 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

45.9M / mm²

44.4M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

242 mm 9.5 inches

Height

—

112 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

499 USD

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

—

GeForce 20

Successor

—

GeForce 40

View Arc A350M Details View GeForce RTX 3070 Details