Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct benchmark results between the Intel Arc 140T Mobile and the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual. Both entries show an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rival comparisons. Consequently, a head-to-head numerical comparison cannot be constructed from the available measurements. The analysis must instead rely on the architectural and specification differences documented in the database.

The most significant performance indicator is raw throughput. The Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Arc 140T Mobile delivers 4.813 TFLOPS. This places the Pro B60 Dual roughly 155% ahead in raw single-precision floating-point throughput. In FP16, the Pro B60 Dual reaches 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1), versus 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1) for the 140T Mobile. The gap in pixel throughput is similarly large: 192.0 GPixel/s versus 75.20 GPixel/s, a difference of approximately 155%. Texture rate follows the same pattern, with 384.0 GTexel/s against 150.4 GTexel/s.

Clock speeds narrow the gap somewhat. The Pro B60 Dual runs a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz. The 140T Mobile has a base of 300 MHz and a boost of 2350 MHz. The boost clocks are close, but the Pro B60 Dual’s base clock is far higher, which matters for sustained workloads. The 140T Mobile compensates with a much lower thermal envelope, rated at 35 W versus 400 W for the Pro B60 Dual.

Memory bandwidth is another decisive separator. The Pro B60 Dual uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, achieving 456.0 GB/s. The 140T Mobile uses system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. The database does not assign a fixed figure to the mobile part, so the discrete card’s dedicated bandwidth advantage is clear but not numerically comparable. The Pro B60 Dual also carries a dedicated memory clock of 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), while the mobile part’s memory clock is system shared.

Shader resources favor the Pro B60 Dual across the board. It has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 80 raster output units, and 20 ray tracing cores. The 140T Mobile has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 RT cores. These counts are consistent with the throughput figures above: the Pro B60 Dual has 2.5 times the shading units, 2.5 times the TMUs, 2.5 times the ROPs, and 2.5 times the RT cores.

The Verdict

The data points to two different products with separate purposes, not direct competitors. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is a high-throughput discrete graphics card. Its 12.29 TFLOPS FP32, 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 400 W power envelope indicate a device built for sustained, heavy compute or professional rendering workloads. The 140T Mobile is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) within a 35 W envelope. Its 4.813 TFLOPS FP32 and system shared memory indicate a part designed for mobility and power efficiency, not peak performance.

The verdict from the recorded data is unambiguous: the Pro B60 Dual outperforms the 140T Mobile in every measured compute and memory category. The 140T Mobile’s advantage lies entirely in power consumption, physical size (IGP versus dual-slot), and the absence of external power connectors or a suggested PSU. For scenarios where power draw and space are constrained, the 140T Mobile is the only viable choice. For scenarios where raw throughput, memory capacity, and bandwidth are paramount, the Pro B60 Dual dominates.

The database lists the Pro B60 Dual with a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD. The 140T Mobile has no listed launch MSRP. This price difference reinforces the positional gap: the Pro B60 Dual is a professional or high-end workstation part, while the 140T Mobile is an integrated solution.

Where Each One Wins

The Arc 140T Mobile wins in portability and integration. It is an IGP with a slot width of IGP, meaning it occupies no expansion slot. It uses system shared memory, so no dedicated VRAM allocation is required. Its 35 W TDP allows it to operate within a laptop or compact system thermal budget. The database lists its display outputs as portable device dependent, confirming its role in mobile devices. Its predecessor is listed as HD Graphics-M, and its generation is Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake), both indicating a lineage of integrated mobile graphics.

The Arc Pro B60 Dual wins in every performance-critical category. Its 24 GB GDDR6 memory with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth is a dedicated pool, not shared with a CPU. Its 2560 shading units and 20 RT cores provide substantial compute and ray tracing capacity. Its PCIe 5.0 x8 interface provides a high-bandwidth connection to the host. Its dual-slot cooler and 1x 16-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 800 W, indicate a device designed for desktop workstations. Its display outputs, 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1, support multiple high-resolution monitors.

The production status for both is Active, so neither is discontinued. The release dates differ: the 140T Mobile released on 2025-01-12, while the Pro B60 Dual released on 2025-09-04. Both use a 5 nm process node from TSMC, so manufacturing technology is identical. The difference is in scale and intent: the Pro B60 Dual has 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, with a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The 140T Mobile’s transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 12.29 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc 140T Mobile delivers 4.813 TFLOPS FP32. The Pro B60 Dual is approximately 155% higher.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have and what type?

A: The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc 140T Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth and no dedicated memory type.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Arc 140T Mobile has a TDP of 35 W, uses an IGP slot width, and has no power connectors. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has a TDP of 400 W, is dual-slot, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 800 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the release date for each GPU?

A: The Arc 140T Mobile was released on 2025-01-12. The Arc Pro B60 Dual was released on 2025-09-04. Both are currently listed as Active in production.

Q: What is the process node and architecture for each?

A: Both use a 5 nm TSMC process. The Arc 140T Mobile uses the Xe-LPG+ architecture on the Arrow Lake-H chip. The Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the Xe2-HPG architecture on the BMG-G21 chip.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs belong to different architectural generations. The Arc 140T Mobile uses Xe-LPG+, which is part of the Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) generation. The chip is Arrow Lake-H, and the architecture is described as Xe-LPG+. The Arc Pro B60 Dual uses Xe2-HPG, part of the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation, on the BMG-G21 chip.

The core configurations differ substantially. The 140T Mobile has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 RT cores. The Pro B60 Dual has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 RT cores. These are exact multiples: the Pro B60 Dual has 2.5 times each resource type. Neither GPU lists tensor cores, so AI acceleration via dedicated tensor hardware is not documented for either.

Ray tracing support exists on both, with 8 RT cores on the mobile part and 20 on the discrete part. The RT core count scales with the shader count, suggesting a consistent architecture block design. The memory architectures are fundamentally different: the mobile part shares system memory, while the discrete part uses dedicated GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus.

The process node is identical (5 nm, TSMC), but the die scale is not. The Pro B60 Dual has 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, achieving 72.1M transistors per mm². The 140T Mobile’s transistor count and die size are unknown in the database. The Pro B60 Dual’s transistor density is a recorded figure, while the mobile part’s density is not listed.

Both support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This means software compatibility at the API level is identical, but actual performance will differ due to hardware resources.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two GPUs in the database:

• Chip: Arrow Lake-H (140T Mobile) versus BMG-G21 (Pro B60 Dual)
• Architecture: Xe-LPG+ (140T Mobile) versus Xe2-HPG (Pro B60 Dual)
• Generation: Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) versus Battlemage (Pro Series)
• Transistors: Unknown (140T Mobile) versus 19,600 million (Pro B60 Dual)
• Die Size: Unknown (140T Mobile) versus 272 mm² (Pro B60 Dual)
• Transistor Density: Not listed (140T Mobile) versus 72.1M per mm² (Pro B60 Dual)
• Base Clock: 300 MHz (140T Mobile) versus 2000 MHz (Pro B60 Dual)
• Boost Clock: 2350 MHz (140T Mobile) versus 2400 MHz (Pro B60 Dual)
• Memory Clock: System Shared (140T Mobile) versus 2375 MHz, 19 Gbps effective (Pro B60 Dual)
• Memory Size: System Shared (140T Mobile) versus 24 GB (Pro B60 Dual)
• Memory Type: System Shared (140T Mobile) versus GDDR6 (Pro B60 Dual)
• Memory Bus Width: System Shared (140T Mobile) versus 192 bit (Pro B60 Dual)
• Memory Bandwidth: System Dependent (140T Mobile) versus 456.0 GB/s (Pro B60 Dual)
• Shading Units: 1024 (140T Mobile) versus 2560 (Pro B60 Dual)
• TMUs: 64 (140T Mobile) versus 160 (Pro B60 Dual)
• ROPs: 32 (140T Mobile) versus 80 (Pro B60 Dual)
• RT Cores: 8 (140T Mobile) versus 20 (Pro B60 Dual)
• Pixel Rate: 75.20 GPixel/s (140T Mobile) versus 192.0 GPixel/s (Pro B60 Dual)
• Texture Rate: 150.4 GTexel/s (140T Mobile) versus 384.0 GTexel/s (Pro B60 Dual)
• FP32 Performance: 4.813 TFLOPS (140T Mobile) versus 12.29 TFLOPS (Pro B60 Dual)
• FP16 Performance: 9.626 TFLOPS (140T Mobile) versus 24.58 TFLOPS (Pro B60 Dual)
• TDP: 35 W (140T Mobile) versus 400 W (Pro B60 Dual)
• Slot Width: IGP (140T Mobile) versus Dual-slot (Pro B60 Dual)
• Power Connectors: None (140T Mobile) versus 1x 16-pin (Pro B60 Dual)
• Suggested PSU: Not listed (140T Mobile) versus 800 W (Pro B60 Dual)
• Bus Interface: IGP (140T Mobile) versus PCIe 5.0 x8 (Pro B60 Dual)
• Display Outputs: Portable Device Dependent (140T Mobile) versus 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 (Pro B60 Dual)
• Dimensions: Not listed (140T Mobile) versus 300 mm length, 110 mm height, 40 mm width (Pro B60 Dual)
• Release Date: 2025-01-12 (140T Mobile) versus 2025-09-04 (Pro B60 Dual)
• Predecessor: HD Graphics-M (140T Mobile) versus None (Pro B60 Dual)
• Launch MSRP: Not listed (140T Mobile) versus 1,199 USD (Pro B60 Dual)

The shared fields include manufacturer (Intel), process node (5 nm), foundry (TSMC), API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4), and production status (Active). The 140T Mobile has a successor listed as null, and the Pro B60 Dual also has no successor. The 140T Mobile’s predecessor is HD Graphics-M, while the Pro B60 Dual has no predecessor listed.