Intel Arc 130T Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a single benchmark result for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, while the Intel Arc 130T Mobile has no stored benchmark scores. The RTX 5070 SUPER produces a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690. With no head-to-head benchmark entries, the comparison rests on this lone data point and the architectural specifications of both parts.

The RTX 5070 SUPER lands at the 18th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals according to the recorded data are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M with an average score of 2664, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 at 2662, the Intel Arc Pro B50 at 2660, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 at 2645. The RTX 5070 SUPER leads the Quadro K1100M by 1 percent, the GT 1030 by 1.1 percent, the Arc Pro B50 by 1.1 percent, and the GT 440 by 1.7 percent. These are narrow margins, and the percentile rank indicates the score sits in the lower fifth of the entire GPU population tracked by the database.

The Intel Arc 130T Mobile has an average benchmark score of zero and holds the 50th percentile position, but without any actual test results, the percentile is an artifact of the empty benchmark array rather than a measured outcome. The data shows no wins recorded for either side in head-to-head testing, and the wins counter sits at zero for both items. The absence of a measured score for the Intel part means the RTX 5070 SUPER's 2690 point result stands as the only quantitative performance datum available for this comparison.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge sharply in architecture, manufacturing scale, and feature allocation. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile uses the Xe-LPG+ architecture built on the Arrow Lake-H chip, part of the Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER uses Blackwell 2.0 on the GB205 chip, part of the GeForce 50-series. Both are fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, so the manufacturing node is identical, but the die characteristics are not.

NVIDIA reports 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 118.3 million transistors per square millimeter. Intel lists the transistor count and die size as unknown, so the density cannot be calculated for the Arc 130T Mobile. The RTX 5070 SUPER is a discrete, dual-slot card with a 245 mm length, 115 mm height, and 40 mm width, plus a 16-pin power connector and a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. The Intel part is an integrated GPU with an IGP slot width and IGP bus interface, drawing from the host system's memory rather than carrying dedicated VRAM.

Compute resources differ by an order of magnitude. The RTX 5070 SUPER contains 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, 80 raster output pipelines, 50 ray tracing cores, and 200 tensor cores. The Arc 130T Mobile has 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, 28 ROPs, and 7 ray tracing cores, with no tensor core count listed. The NVIDIA part reaches a pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s, while the Intel part manages 61.60 GPixel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s. Floating point throughput shows the same gap: the RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 32.15 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio, whereas the Arc 130T Mobile delivers 3.942 TFLOPS FP32 and 7.885 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio.

Memory configurations are fundamentally different. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192 bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The Arc 130T Mobile shares system memory, with the size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system shared or system dependent. The Intel part's boost clock reaches 2200 MHz from a 300 MHz base, while the NVIDIA part runs a 2325 MHz base and 2512 MHz boost. Power draw diverges heavily: the RTX 5070 SUPER has a 275 W TDP, the Arc 130T Mobile a 35 W TDP. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA card outputs to 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the Intel IGP's display outputs are portable device dependent.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS FP32, compared to the Intel Arc 130T Mobile's 3.942 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER uses 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192 bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc 130T Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has a 275 W TDP, while the Arc 130T Mobile has a 35 W TDP.

Q: What is the RTX 5070 SUPER's benchmark score and percentile?

A: It scores 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and sits at the 18th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 50 ray tracing cores, while the Arc 130T Mobile has 7.

Q: Are both GPUs on the same manufacturing process?

A: Yes, both are fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc 130T Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe-LPG+ | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Chip | Arrow Lake-H | GB205 |

| Generation | Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) | GeForce 50 |

| Transistors | Unknown | 31,100 million |

| Die Size | Unknown | 263 mm² |

| Transistor Density | Not listed | 118.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 2325 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz | 2512 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 18 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 672.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 896 | 6400 |

| TMUs | 56 | 200 |

| ROPs | 28 | 80 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 7 | 50 |

| Tensor Cores | Not listed | 200 |

| Pixel Rate | 61.60 GPixel/s | 201.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 502.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 3.942 TFLOPS | 32.15 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 35 W | 275 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | Not listed | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 245 mm x 115 mm x 40 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2025-12-31 |

| Benchmark Score | 0 (none recorded) | 2690 |

| Percentile | 50 (no measured data) | 18 |

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a decisive performance hierarchy. The RTX 5070 SUPER is the only one of the two with a measured benchmark score, and that score of 2690 places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, which is low overall but still ahead of its four nearest rivals by margins between 1 and 1.7 percent. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile has no recorded benchmark result, so its performance cannot be directly quantified from the database. The architectural data fills in the picture: the NVIDIA part carries roughly 7 times the shading units, 3.6 times the ROPs, 7 times the ray tracing cores, and 8 times the FP32 throughput of the Intel part. The memory subsystem is similarly lopsided, with 18 GB of dedicated GDDR7 and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth versus system shared memory of dependent bandwidth.

The RTX 5070 SUPER is a discrete, dual-slot card requiring a 16-pin connector and a 275 W TDP. The Arc 130T Mobile is an integrated GPU with a 35 W TDP and no dedicated power connector, designed to fit into the host system's power envelope. The use case for each is clear from the specs: the NVIDIA part targets scenarios demanding high throughput and dedicated memory, while the Intel part targets systems where an IGP form factor and low power draw are mandatory. The 5 nm process node is shared, so the performance difference comes from scale, not process advantage. The RTX 5070 SUPER's later release date of 2025-12-31 versus the Arc 130T Mobile's 2025-01-12 also suggests a generational gap within the same year.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER wins on every measurable performance specification. Its 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is 8.2 times the Arc 130T Mobile's 3.942 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s is 4.1 times the Intel part's 123.2 GTexel/s. The pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s is 3.3 times the 61.60 GPixel/s of the Arc 130T Mobile. The RTX 5070 SUPER also wins on memory bandwidth, with 672.0 GB/s versus a system dependent figure that the database does not quantify. The 200 tensor cores give the NVIDIA part a feature that the Intel part does not list at all, and the 50 ray tracing cores versus 7 indicate a substantial advantage in ray tracing workloads.

The Intel Arc 130T Mobile wins on power efficiency in absolute terms. Its 35 W TDP is 12.7 percent of the RTX 5070 SUPER's 275 W TDP, meaning the integrated part draws far less power while still providing a baseline level of graphics capability. The Arc 130T Mobile also wins on physical integration: it is an IGP with no power connector and no slot width, so it fits into portable and compact devices without occupying a PCIe slot or requiring a discrete power supply. The RTX 5070 SUPER demands a dual-slot chassis, a 16-pin power connector, and a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot, plus the physical space for a 245 mm card. The Intel part's system shared memory means the host system's RAM serves as VRAM, which simplifies the bill of materials but caps memory performance at whatever the system provides.

The RTX 5070 SUPER's benchmark presence is the only measured win in the database. The Arc 130T Mobile has no score to compare, so claims about its real-world speed rest entirely on its architecture specifications. The data shows a clear split: the discrete NVIDIA card dominates compute, memory, and features, while the integrated Intel part dominates power draw and form factor flexibility. The RTX 5070 SUPER's 2690 point Steel Nomad score and its narrow lead over rivals like the GT 1030 and Quadro K1100M suggest that despite its massive specification sheet, its measured performance in this particular test is modest. The Arc 130T Mobile, with its 50th percentile placeholder, cannot be positioned relative to that result without a recorded benchmark.