AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU versus the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual. Both entries list empty benchmark arrays, zero average benchmark scores, and zero wins for either side. The absence of measured performance data means the comparison must rely entirely on architectural specifications, memory subsystems, and feature sets rather than empirical test results.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU occupies the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual also sits at the 50th percentile. With identical percentile rankings and no benchmark scores recorded, the two products cannot be separated by measured performance alone. This places the comparison squarely on paper specifications and design intent.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers substantially higher raw compute figures. Its FP32 throughput reaches 12.29 TFLOPS, which is 48.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU's 8.294 TFLOPS. The gap widens dramatically in FP16 workloads: the Intel part achieves 24.58 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the AMD part manages only 8.294 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. This means the Intel GPU offers nearly three times the FP16 throughput, a decisive advantage for workloads that leverage mixed-precision computation.

Pixel throughput follows a similar pattern. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual reaches 192.0 GPixel/s, more than double the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU's 86.40 GPixel/s. Texture rate tells the same story: 384.0 GTexel/s versus 129.6 GTexel/s, a 2.96x margin in favor of Intel. These figures indicate that the Intel card processes geometry and fills pixels at a much higher rate, which typically translates to better performance in resolution-heavy rendering tasks.

Memory bandwidth represents another major separation point. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses a 192-bit GDDR6 bus running at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed, producing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU relies on a 128-bit LPDDR5X bus at 937 MHz with 7.5 Gbps effective speed, yielding only 119.9 GB/s. The Intel card provides 3.8x more memory bandwidth, a critical factor for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and compute workloads that stream data through the GPU.

Shading resources favor Intel decisively. The Arc Pro B60 Dual packs 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 80 render output units, and 20 ray tracing cores. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU contains 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 12 RT cores. Intel's advantage in shading units is 3.33x, in TMUs 3.33x, in ROPs 2.5x, and in RT cores 1.67x. These resource ratios align with the compute throughput gaps and suggest the Intel product targets much heavier rendering and compute loads.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU provides 8.294 TFLOPS. Intel holds a 48.1% advantage in single-precision compute.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU uses 16 GB of LPDDR5X memory on a 128-bit bus with 119.9 GB/s bandwidth. Intel offers 50% more capacity and 3.8x more bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU has a TDP of 28 W and requires no power connectors. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a TDP of 400 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and recommends an 800 W power supply.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual contains 20 ray tracing cores, compared to 12 in the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU. Intel provides 1.67x more RT resources.

Q: What display outputs does each card offer?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU provides a single USB Type-C output. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual offers four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, supporting multi-display professional configurations.

Q: How do the manufacturing processes compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU uses TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 142.6 million transistors per mm². The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses TSMC's 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding 72.1 million transistors per mm². AMD's process is denser, while Intel's die is physically larger.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using the Hawk Point chip, categorized as a Console GPU generation from AMD. It employs a 4 nm process at TSMC with 25,390 million transistors packed into a 178 mm² die. The transistor density reaches 142.6 million transistors per mm², reflecting a compact, power-efficient design. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with FP16 execution at a 1:1 ratio relative to FP32.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the Xe2-HPG architecture on the BMG-G21 chip, belonging to the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 19,600 million transistors spread across a 272 mm² die, producing a transistor density of 72.1 million transistors per mm². This architecture also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but executes FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, doubling throughput relative to FP32.

The structural differences are significant. AMD's design concentrates more transistors per area, suggesting a denser, more integrated layout optimized for low power consumption. Intel's design uses a larger die with lower density, which typically allows for higher clock speeds and more parallel execution units but consumes far more power. The AMD GPU uses LPDDR5X memory, a low-power standard often found in compact or mobile-oriented devices, while Intel uses GDDR6, a high-bandwidth discrete memory standard suited to add-in cards.

Ray tracing implementations also differ. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU integrates 12 RT cores within its RDNA 3.0 layout, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual includes 20 RT cores in its Xe2-HPG design. The higher RT core count on Intel suggests a more aggressive approach to hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though no benchmark data confirms real-world scaling.

The power delivery architecture diverges completely. AMD's 28 W TDP with no power connectors indicates a design intended for integration into systems with minimal power budgets, possibly embedded or mobile platforms. Intel's 400 W TDP with a dedicated 16-pin connector and an 800 W recommended power supply signals a professional workstation or high-performance desktop add-in card. The bus interface also differs: the AMD GPU lists no bus interface, while Intel uses PCIe 5.0 x8.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measurable specification. Process node: AMD uses 4 nm, Intel uses 5 nm. Transistor count: AMD has 25,390 million, Intel has 19,600 million. Die size: AMD measures 178 mm², Intel measures 272 mm². Transistor density: AMD achieves 142.6 million per mm², Intel achieves 72.1 million per mm².

Clock speeds diverge sharply. AMD's base clock runs at 800 MHz with a boost of 2700 MHz. Intel's base clock starts at 2000 MHz with a boost of 2400 MHz. Intel's base clock is 2.5x higher, while AMD's boost clock is 12.5% higher. Memory clocks also differ: AMD runs at 937 MHz (7.5 Gbps effective), Intel runs at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

Memory capacity and type: AMD offers 16 GB of LPDDR5X, Intel offers 24 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: AMD uses 128 bit, Intel uses 192 bit. Bandwidth: AMD provides 119.9 GB/s, Intel provides 456.0 GB/s.

Compute resources: AMD has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 12 RT cores. Intel has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 RT cores. Pixel rate: AMD reaches 86.40 GPixel/s, Intel reaches 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: AMD hits 129.6 GTexel/s, Intel hits 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32: AMD at 8.294 TFLOPS, Intel at 12.29 TFLOPS. FP16: AMD at 8.294 TFLOPS (1:1), Intel at 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and physical attributes: AMD has a 28 W TDP with no power connectors and no slot width specified. Intel has a 400 W TDP, a dual-slot form factor, a single 16-pin connector, and an 800 W recommended PSU. Dimensions: Intel measures 300 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width; AMD lists no dimensions.

Display outputs: AMD provides one USB Type-C port, Intel provides four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. Bus interface: AMD lists none, Intel uses PCIe 5.0 x8. Release dates: AMD launched on 2024-12-31, Intel launched on 2025-09-04. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD, while AMD lists no launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The data indicates two GPUs designed for entirely different roles. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU, with its 28 W TDP, 16 GB of LPDDR5X, and compact 178 mm² die, appears engineered for power-constrained environments where efficiency matters more than raw throughput. Its single USB Type-C output and absence of a power connector reinforce this interpretation. The 4 nm process and high transistor density (142.6M per mm²) suggest a highly optimized, low-power design that can fit into thin or integrated systems.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, by contrast, is a professional-grade add-in card. Its 400 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, 24 GB of GDDR6, PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, and four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs position it for workstation use, multi-display setups, and compute-heavy tasks. The 2.5x higher base clock, 3.8x memory bandwidth, and 2.96x texture rate all point to sustained high-load operation.

The verdict splits clearly along workload boundaries. For applications that prioritize low power draw, compact integration, and modest compute needs, the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU provides a coherent package. For workloads demanding high memory bandwidth, large memory capacity, substantial FP16 throughput, and multi-monitor output, the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is the better fit based on specifications alone. The identical 50th percentile rankings and absence of benchmark scores mean neither product can claim a measured performance victory.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU wins in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 28 W TDP versus Intel's 400 W represents a 14.3x difference in power draw. The AMD card requires no power connectors, while Intel needs a 16-pin connector and an 800 W power supply. AMD's die size of 178 mm² is 34.6% smaller than Intel's 272 mm², and its transistor density is 1.98x higher. These factors favor deployments in compact systems, embedded applications, or any environment with strict power and thermal limits.

The AMD GPU also wins on boost clock headroom. Its 2700 MHz boost exceeds Intel's 2400 MHz by 12.5%, which can benefit burst workloads that do not sustain maximum load. The 1:1 FP16 ratio means the AMD card does not gain additional throughput in half-precision tasks, but it also does not sacrifice FP32 performance when switching precisions.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins in every raw performance category. FP32 throughput is 48.1% higher. FP16 throughput is 196.3% higher. Pixel rate is 122.2% higher. Texture rate is 196.3% higher. Memory bandwidth is 280.3% higher. Memory capacity is 50% higher. Shading units, TMUs, ROPs, and RT cores all exceed AMD's counts by factors ranging from 1.67x to 3.33x.

Intel wins on memory technology and bandwidth. GDDR6 at 19 Gbps effective on a 192-bit bus provides 456.0 GB/s, which is essential for large data sets and high-resolution rendering. The 24 GB capacity allows for larger working sets than AMD's 16 GB, reducing the need for memory swapping in compute workloads.

Intel wins on display connectivity. Four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support multi-monitor professional setups, while AMD offers a single USB Type-C port. Intel's PCIe 5.0 x8 interface provides a modern host connection, while AMD lists no bus interface.

Intel wins on base clock stability. Its 2000 MHz base clock is 2.5x higher than AMD's 800 MHz, suggesting better sustained performance under continuous load. Intel also wins on FP16 efficiency with a 2:1 ratio, effectively doubling half-precision throughput without additional hardware.

The use-case split follows these strengths. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU suits low-power, space-constrained environments where efficiency and minimal cooling are priorities. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual suits professional rendering, compute acceleration, and multi-display workstation configurations where maximum throughput and bandwidth are non-negotiable.