AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Both entries carry an average benchmark score of 0, and neither lists any nearest rivals with comparative scores or percentile deltas. As a result, a numerical performance comparison cannot be constructed from the recorded data alone. What the data does show, however, is a stark contrast in raw compute specifications, which allows for a theoretical comparison of processing capabilities.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, a figure that is roughly 5.9 times higher than the 4.147 TFLOPS offered by the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU. In FP16 workloads, the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1), while the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU manages 8.294 TFLOPS (2:1). This places the LX PRO in a different performance class entirely, with a 5.9x advantage in both precision formats. The texture rate tells a similar story: the LX PRO outputs 384.0 GTexel/s versus 129.6 GTexel/s for the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU, a 2.96x margin. Pixel throughput also favors the LX PRO, which posts 192.0 GPixel/s compared to 86.40 GPixel/s for the AMD part, a 2.22x lead.

Memory bandwidth heavily favors the LX PRO as well. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU relies on 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128-bit bus, producing 102.4 GB/s. That represents a 4.22x bandwidth advantage for the Lisuan Tech product. The memory clock difference is also notable: the LX PRO runs its memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), whereas the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU operates at 800 MHz (6.4 Gbps effective).

The gap in shading units, texture mapping units, and render output units is substantial. The LX PRO contains 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. This translates to an 8x difference in shading units, a 4x difference in TMUs, and a 3x difference in ROPs. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU does include 12 ray tracing cores, a feature the LX PRO lacks entirely, as its specification lists no RT cores. However, the sheer compute advantage of the LX PRO could offset this in rasterized workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU is designed for constrained environments. Its 28 W TDP, lack of power connectors, and single USB Type-C display output indicate a low-power, compact solution. The data shows no slot width, length, height, or width dimensions for the AMD part, suggesting it is intended for integration into tightly packed systems, likely handheld consoles or embedded designs. Its 16 GB of LPDDR5 memory is unified with the host system, given the absence of a dedicated bus interface. This part wins in scenarios where power draw and physical footprint are the primary constraints, and where 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient for the workload.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the opposite. Its 225 W TDP, dual-slot design, 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width, along with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested 550 W power supply, place it firmly in the desktop discrete GPU segment. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. This part wins in scenarios requiring high throughput, large frame buffers, and multi-display setups. The 24 GB frame buffer and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are suited for high-resolution textures, large datasets, and compute-heavy tasks.

The API support is nearly identical, with both parts supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. This gives the AMD part a slight edge in the latest Vulkan extensions, though the practical impact depends on application adoption. The LX PRO's raw FP32 throughput, 5.9x higher, suggests it would dominate in compute-bound scenarios such as rendering, simulation, or machine learning inference, provided the software is not limited by the absence of RT cores.

Architecture Differences

The fundamental architectural split is clear. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with the chip designated as Rembrandt+. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses an architecture called TrueGPU, with a chip labeled 7G105, also on a 6 nm process at TSMC, belonging to the 7G100 generation. Both parts share the same process node and foundry, which levels the manufacturing baseline.

Transistor counts differ significantly, though the LX PRO's exact figure is unknown. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU integrates 13,100 million transistors on a 208 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 63.0M per mm². The LX PRO does not report transistor count, die size, or density, so a direct comparison is impossible. What is clear is the massive difference in execution resources: 6144 shading units versus 768, 192 TMUs versus 48, and 96 ROPs versus 32. The LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute requires a much larger silicon footprint, though the specifics remain unrecorded.

Memory architecture diverges as well. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses LPDDR5, a low-power memory type suitable for unified memory architectures, with a 128-bit bus. The LX PRO uses GDDR6, a dedicated graphics memory type, on a 192-bit bus. This explains the bandwidth gap: 432.0 GB/s versus 102.4 GB/s. The LX PRO also has a higher effective memory clock, 18 Gbps versus 6.4 Gbps. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU's lack of a bus interface suggests it is not a standalone PCIe card, while the LX PRO's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface confirms its role as a discrete add-in board.

Ray tracing support is a key differentiator. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has 12 RT cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The LX PRO lists no RT cores, meaning it likely relies on compute shaders for any ray tracing effects, which would be significantly slower. The power envelope reflects this: the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU runs at 28 W with no external power connectors, while the LX PRO draws 225 W via a single 16-pin connector. The display outputs also differ: the AMD part has a single USB Type-C output, while the Lisuan part has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, with 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), versus the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU's 4.147 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.294 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and an 18 Gbps effective clock. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128-bit bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth and a 6.4 Gbps effective clock.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 12 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO lists no ray tracing cores in its specifications.

Q: What is the power requirement for each GPU?

A: The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has a 28 W TDP and requires no power connectors. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU supports more display outputs?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has a single USB Type-C output.

Q: Are both GPUs on the same manufacturing process?

A: Yes, both are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture, while the LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture.

The Verdict

The recorded data paints a clear picture of two products aimed at entirely different use cases. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU is a low-power, integrated-style solution with a 28 W TDP, no power connectors, and a single USB Type-C output. Its 4.147 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth are modest, but its 12 RT cores and Vulkan 1.4 support provide modern feature coverage. The 16 GB of LPDDR5 memory is ample for its intended class. This part is suited for portable or embedded systems where power draw is critical and the physical footprint is minimal.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a high-performance discrete GPU. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 24 GB of GDDR6 memory place it in a professional or enthusiast desktop category. The dual-slot cooler, 248 mm length, and 225 W TDP confirm a desktop-oriented design. The lack of RT cores is a notable omission, but the 5.9x compute advantage over the AMD part could compensate in non-ray-traced workloads. The four DisplayPort outputs and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface target multi-monitor and workstation configurations.

Given the benchmark scores are both zero and no head-to-head results exist, the selection between these two depends entirely on the target platform. For a low-power integrated solution with ray tracing support, the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU is the only choice. For a high-throughput desktop card with massive memory bandwidth and compute throughput, the LX PRO is the only choice. The data does not support a direct performance comparison, but it does confirm that these products do not overlap in their intended markets. The RX PRO's 5.9x FP32 lead and 4.22x bandwidth lead are decisive in any compute-heavy scenario, while the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU's 28 W power draw and RT cores define its niche.