AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU, as its benchmark array is empty and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero. In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a substantial set of recorded measurements. Its average benchmark score across all tests is 31,087, which places it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores, so direct numeric comparison is not possible from the available data.

What the data does show is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's performance profile across multiple test suites. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 5,569. Geekbench OpenCL returns 199,267, while Geekbench Vulkan shows 53,683. Passmark results include DirectX 10 at 181, DirectX 11 at 278, DirectX 12 at 119, DirectX 9 at 360, G2D at 1,225, G3D at 31,811, and GPU Compute at 18,372.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its standing. The NVIDIA Quadro M5000 averages 31,206, which is 0.4% lower. The NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q averages 31,220, also 0.4% lower. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell averages 31,532, which is 1.4% higher. The NVIDIA TITAN RTX averages 31,676, 1.9% higher. These small deltas indicate the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER clusters tightly with high-end workstation and enthusiast cards, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has no comparable data points to evaluate.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses the Rembrandt+ chip built on RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 13,100 million transistors on a 208 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 63.0 million per square millimeter. This is a console-class GPU with a 28 W TDP, designed for low-power integrated use.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip based on Ada Lovelace architecture, also from TSMC but on a 5 nm process. It packs 45,900 million transistors onto a 379 mm² die, achieving a density of 121.1 million per square millimeter. The TDP is 285 W, roughly ten times the AMD part's power envelope. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER belongs to the GeForce 40-series with a predecessor in GeForce 30 and successor in GeForce 50.

Shader resources differ dramatically. The AMD GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, 32 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA GPU has 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 66 RT cores, and 264 tensor cores. The NVIDIA part's FP32 throughput is 44.10 TFLOPS, while the AMD part delivers 4.147 TFLOPS. FP16 performance shows the architecture split: AMD reaches 8.294 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, while NVIDIA achieves 44.10 TFLOPS at 1:1, meaning NVIDIA's FP16 rate matches its FP32 rate.

Clock behavior also differs. The AMD GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and boost of 2700 MHz. The NVIDIA GPU starts at 2340 MHz base and boosts to 2610 MHz. Despite the lower base clock, AMD's boost reaches higher than NVIDIA's boost, but the massive shader count difference overwhelms clock effects. Pixel rate for AMD is 86.40 GPixel/s versus 250.6 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate is 129.6 GTexel/s versus 689.0 GTexel/s.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 672.3 GB/s from 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has 102.4 GB/s from 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128-bit bus. NVIDIA's bandwidth is approximately 6.6 times higher.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes, both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support. They also both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical.

Q: What is the transistor density comparison?

A: The NVIDIA chip has 121.1 million transistors per square millimeter, while the AMD chip has 63.0 million per square millimeter. The 5 nm process enables roughly double the density of the 6 nm process.

Q: How do the ray tracing cores compare?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 66 RT cores, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has 12. NVIDIA also adds 264 tensor cores, which the AMD part lacks entirely.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of the NVIDIA card?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER measures 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, occupying a triple-slot design with a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Is the AMD GPU still in production?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has an Active production status with a release date of 2024-12-31. The NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is End-of-life, released on 2024-01-23 with a launch MSRP of 799 USD.

The Verdict

The data presents an extreme asymmetry. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has zero recorded benchmarks, zero wins, and no nearest rivals in the database. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has ten benchmark scores, an average of 31,087, and sits at the 76th percentile with four closely matched rivals. The AMD part's 50th percentile ranking with no scores suggests it occupies a middle position in the database's aggregate GPU distribution, but no performance evidence supports any specific capability.

The architectural comparison explains the gap. The NVIDIA GPU has 11 times more shading units, 5.5 times more TMUs, 3 times more ROPs, 5.5 times more RT cores, and 10.6 times higher FP32 throughput. Its memory bandwidth is 6.6 times higher. Its TDP is 285 W versus 28 W, reflecting a desktop-class discrete card versus a low-power integrated solution. The AMD GPU uses RDNA 2.0 on 6 nm, while NVIDIA uses Ada Lovelace on 5 nm with tensor cores for AI workloads.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's nearest rivals show it trades blows with other high-end cards within a 2% window. The Quadro M5000 and GRID M60-1Q are 0.4% lower. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 1.4% higher. The TITAN RTX is 1.9% higher. This clustering indicates the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER performs at a consistent level with established flagship cards from previous generations.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 13,100 million | 45,900 million |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | 379 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 63.0M / mm² | 121.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 800 MHz | 2340 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2700 MHz | 2610 MHz |

| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | GDDR6X |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 672.3 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 768 | 8448 |

| TMUs | 48 | 264 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 12 | 66 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 264 |

| Pixel Rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 250.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 129.6 GTexel/s | 689.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.147 TFLOPS | 44.10 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 8.294 TFLOPS (2:1) | 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 28 W | 285 W |

| Slot Width | Not specified | Triple-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not specified | 600 W |

| Bus Interface | Not specified | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Dimensions | Not specified | 310 mm x 140 mm x 61 mm |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2024-12-31 | 2024-01-23 |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU wins exclusively in power efficiency and integration. Its 28 W TDP requires no power connectors and produces no slot-width requirement, making it suitable for compact or mobile implementations. The single USB Type-C display output indicates a minimal physical footprint. Its 6 nm process and 13,100 million transistors on a 208 mm² die show a purpose-built design for constrained environments where space and thermal limits dominate. The 800 MHz base clock with 2700 MHz boost suggests a wide dynamic range for power management.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins all measurable performance categories. Its 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 672.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 250.6 GPixel/s pixel rate place it in a different performance class entirely. The 264 tensor cores enable AI acceleration that the AMD part cannot match. The 66 RT cores provide substantially more ray tracing capability. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, triple-slot cooler, and 600 W suggested PSU indicate a desktop workstation or high-end gaming card.

The production status difference matters. AMD's GPU is Active, meaning it is currently available for ongoing designs. NVIDIA's GPU is End-of-life, replaced by the GeForce 50 series. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's launch MSRP of 799 USD reflects its position at introduction, though the database records no pricing for the AMD part. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's benchmark scores remain competitive with its nearest rivals, all within 2% of its average, suggesting its end-of-life status has not diminished its performance standing.

The use-case split follows the data. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU targets systems where the 28 W power budget, absent power connectors, and compact footprint are the primary requirements. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER targets workloads demanding maximum throughput: high-resolution rendering, compute tasks, ray tracing, and AI inference through tensor cores. The absence of benchmark data for the AMD part means no quantitative comparison is possible, but the architectural specifications alone indicate a separation of roughly an order of magnitude in raw compute resources.