AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a single benchmark result for the AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 516. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, and there are no head-to-head benchmark entries that directly compare the two. This absence of direct comparative data means the analysis must rely on the Ryzen Z2 Extreme's standing relative to its nearest rivals, as well as the architectural and specification differences between the two products.

The Ryzen Z2 Extreme's 516 score places it in the 1st percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, as recorded, are the Intel HD Graphics P4000 with an average score of 534 (3.4% higher), the AMD Radeon HD 6870 with 536 (3.7% higher), the AMD Radeon HD 6750M with 484 (6.6% lower), and the AMD Radeon HD 6770M with 569 (9.3% higher). The data shows the Ryzen Z2 Extreme trails the HD 6770M by the largest margin among its nearest rivals, while it leads the HD 6750M by 6.6%. These deltas indicate that the Ryzen Z2 Extreme operates in a performance class comparable to older discrete graphics solutions, despite its modern architecture and low power envelope.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and an average benchmark score of zero. Its percentile ranking of 50 is a default placeholder rather than a measured outcome. As such, no direct numerical comparison between the two products is possible from the available data. Any assessment of relative performance must be inferred from the raw specification differences, which are substantial. The LX ULTRA's FP32 compute of 24.58 TFLOPS versus the Ryzen Z2 Extreme's 5.530 TFLOPS suggests a large theoretical throughput advantage for the LX ULTRA, but without benchmark results, this remains an unverified projection.

FAQ

Q: Does the database contain any direct benchmark comparison between the AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA?

A: No. The head-to-head benchmarks field is empty, and the LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores. The only benchmark result in the database for either product is the Ryzen Z2 Extreme's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 516.

Q: How does the Ryzen Z2 Extreme perform relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen Z2 Extreme scores 516, which is 3.4% below the Intel HD Graphics P4000 (534), 3.7% below the AMD Radeon HD 6870 (536), 6.6% above the AMD Radeon HD 6750M (484), and 9.3% below the AMD Radeon HD 6770M (569). It sits in the 1st percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two products?

A: The Ryzen Z2 Extreme uses 16 GB of LPDDR5X on a 128-bit bus, delivering 128.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA's memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while the Ryzen Z2 Extreme's memory clock is 1000 MHz (8 Gbps effective).

Q: Which product has a higher shading unit count?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, compared to the Ryzen Z2 Extreme's 1024 shading units. The LX ULTRA also has 192 texture mapping units and 96 raster output pipelines, versus 64 TMUs and 48 ROPs on the Ryzen Z2 Extreme.

Q: Are there any differences in API support?

A: Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the power requirements for each product?

A: The Ryzen Z2 Extreme has a TDP of 28 W and requires no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and lists a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU is built on the Strix Point chip using the RDNA 3.5 architecture. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 145.9M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, but its transistor count, die size, and transistor density are recorded as unknown.

The Ryzen Z2 Extreme features 16 ray tracing cores, while the LX ULTRA's ray tracing core count is not specified in the database. Neither product lists tensor cores. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme's FP16 performance matches its FP32 at 5.530 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), whereas the LX ULTRA's FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS, which is double its FP32 rate (2:1 ratio). This indicates a different compute path design: the RDNA 3.5 architecture on the Ryzen Z2 Extreme does not offer doubled FP16 throughput, while the TrueGPU architecture on the LX ULTRA does.

The process node difference (4 nm versus 6 nm) is notable. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme uses a smaller node, which typically allows for higher transistor density and lower power consumption per transistor. The LX ULTRA's larger node, combined with its significantly higher TDP (225 W versus 28 W), suggests a design prioritizing raw throughput over efficiency. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme's 34 billion transistors on 233 mm² gives a density of 145.9M per mm², a figure that cannot be compared to the LX ULTRA because the latter's die metrics are unknown.

The display output configurations also differ. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme provides a single USB Type-C output, while the LX ULTRA provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. This difference reflects their intended usage environments: the Ryzen Z2 Extreme appears oriented toward compact or mobile form factors, while the LX ULTRA supports multi-monitor desktop setups.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every measurable specification field. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme's base clock is 800 MHz and boost clock is 2700 MHz; the LX ULTRA has no recorded base or boost clock. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme's memory operates at 1000 MHz (8 Gbps effective), while the LX ULTRA's memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Memory capacity differs: 16 GB LPDDR5X versus 24 GB GDDR6. The bus width is 128-bit for the Ryzen Z2 Extreme and 192-bit for the LX ULTRA. Memory bandwidth is 128.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

Compute resources differ substantially. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Pixel rate is 129.6 GPixel/s for the Ryzen Z2 Extreme and 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX ULTRA. Texture rate is 172.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 5.530 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 throughput is 5.530 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and physical specifications also diverge. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme has a TDP of 28 W with no power connectors and no suggested PSU. The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, a dual-slot form factor, one 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W power supply. The LX ULTRA uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface; the Ryzen Z2 Extreme's bus interface is not recorded. The LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme's dimensions are not recorded. The LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3; the Ryzen Z2 Extreme supports Vulkan 1.4. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The release dates differ: the Ryzen Z2 Extreme was released on 2025-07-08, and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA on 2026-03-16. Both are marked as Active in production status. Neither product has a recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU wins on efficiency and portability. Its 28 W TDP requires no auxiliary power connectors, making it suitable for systems where power delivery is limited. Its 4 nm process node and compact design, evidenced by a single USB Type-C display output, indicate an integrated or low-profile solution. The 16 GB LPDDR5X memory is substantial for its class, and its Vulkan 1.4 support is newer than the LX ULTRA's Vulkan 1.3. The recorded benchmark score of 516, while low in absolute terms, at least provides a measurable data point; the LX ULTRA has none.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins on raw specification headroom. It offers 6 times the shading units (6144 versus 1024), 3 times the TMUs (192 versus 64), double the ROPs (96 versus 48), and over 4 times the FP32 throughput (24.58 TFLOPS versus 5.530 TFLOPS). Its FP16 rate of 49.15 TFLOPS is nearly 9 times the Ryzen Z2 Extreme's 5.530 TFLOPS. Memory bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s, more than 3 times the Ryzen Z2 Extreme's 128.0 GB/s. The 24 GB GDDR6 frame buffer exceeds the Ryzen Z2 Extreme's 16 GB LPDDR5X. The LX ULTRA's pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s both surpass the Ryzen Z2 Extreme's corresponding figures of 129.6 GPixel/s and 172.8 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA also provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs versus a single USB Type-C.

The data suggests a use-case split: the Ryzen Z2 Extreme is positioned for power-constrained or compact systems where a 28 W TDP and no power connectors are decisive factors. The LX ULTRA, with its 225 W TDP, 16-pin connector, dual-slot cooler, and 268 mm length, is designed for a full-size desktop expansion slot with dedicated power delivery. Its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and four display outputs align with a traditional discrete GPU role.

Benchmark results confirm the Ryzen Z2 Extreme's performance tier but do not validate the LX ULTRA's capabilities. Without recorded scores for the LX ULTRA, the database cannot confirm whether its theoretical advantages translate into real-world wins. The percentile data for the Ryzen Z2 Extreme (1st percentile) indicates it ranks near the bottom of all GPUs in the database, while the LX ULTRA's percentile of 50 is unsubstantiated by any measurement. The only definitive conclusion is that the LX ULTRA dominates the specification sheet, while the Ryzen Z2 Extreme dominates the efficiency and portability metrics.