AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result for the AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU, scoring 516 points. This places the part at the 1st percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores, so its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile rank sits at the 50th mark by default rather than by measured performance.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its 516-point result. The Intel HD Graphics P4000 averages 534 points, which is 3.4% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 6870 averages 536 points, 3.7% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 6750M averages 484 points, putting the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU 6.6% ahead. The AMD Radeon HD 6770M averages 569 points, which is 9.3% higher than the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU's result.

The data shows the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU sits in a narrow performance band among older integrated and discrete parts. It trails the HD 6870 and HD 6770M by small margins, while it leads the HD 6750M by a more noticeable 6.6%. The 516-point score indicates a modest performance level that aligns with the 1st percentile ranking.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100's theoretical specifications suggest a much higher compute ceiling, with 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput compared to the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU's 5.530 TFLOPS. However, without a recorded benchmark result, the database cannot confirm how that theoretical throughput translates into actual 3DMark performance. The delta between the two parts in measured terms remains undefined because the head-to-head benchmark array is empty.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to two very different products. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU is a low-power console-oriented GPU with a measured 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 516. Its nearest rivals are all older AMD and Intel parts, and it performs within a 9.3% band of those parts. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a high-power discrete GPU with no measured benchmark data, so its actual performance cannot be verified from the database.

For users who require verified performance data, the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has a concrete result, but that result is low, sitting at the 1st percentile. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 offers no such verification. The database lists its average score as 0, which means no conclusion can be drawn about its real-world speed from the recorded information.

The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU is the only one of the two with a confirmed benchmark outcome, and that outcome places it near the bottom of the database. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, by contrast, has specifications that indicate a far higher compute capacity, but the absence of any measured score prevents a direct performance verdict. The data supports choosing the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU only if a verified, albeit low, performance level is required. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 remains an unverified quantity.

FAQ

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?

A: The recorded score is 516 points.

Q: How does the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 6870?

A: The HD 6870 averages 536 points, which is 3.7% higher than the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU's 516 points.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists its average benchmark score as 0, and its benchmarks array is empty.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 432.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the FP32 compute throughput for each GPU?

A: The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU delivers 5.530 TFLOPS, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel rate?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, compared to the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU's 129.6 GPixel/s.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ substantially across nearly every specification field. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU uses 16 GB of LPDDR5X memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock also differs: the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU runs at 1000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

The shading unit count diverges sharply. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 48 raster operation pipelines, and 16 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no listed ray tracing core count. Pixel and texture rates follow suit: the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU reaches 129.6 GPixel/s and 172.8 GTexel/s, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 reaches 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s.

FP32 and FP16 throughput also differ in both magnitude and ratio. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU delivers 5.530 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, indicating a 2:1 ratio. Power consumption is another major differentiator: the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has a 28 W TDP with no power connectors, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP with one 8-pin connector and a suggested 550 W PSU.

Physical dimensions and display outputs also differ. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has no listed length, height, or width, and offers one USB Type-C output. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card measuring 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm, with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, while the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has no listed bus interface.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is fundamental. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU uses the Strix Point chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It contains 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 145.9M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip built on an architecture called TrueGPU, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The production status for both is active. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU was released on July 8, 2025, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a release date of June 17, 2026. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU belongs to the "Console GPU (AMD)" generation, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 belongs to the "7G100" generation. The manufacturer for the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU is AMD, while the manufacturer for the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is listed as unknown.

API support is nearly identical, with both supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Vulkan versions differ: the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. The memory types reflect different design philosophies: LPDDR5X for the low-power AMD part versus GDDR6 for the high-power Lisuan part.

The architecture names themselves indicate distinct design approaches. RDNA 3.5 is a known AMD graphics architecture with integrated ray tracing cores. TrueGPU, as listed for the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, does not appear elsewhere in the database, and its ray tracing core count is not specified. The FP16 ratio difference (1:1 versus 2:1) also points to different compute pipeline designs.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU wins in the only measured benchmark category. Its 516-point 3DMark Steel Nomad score, while low, is a verified result. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded score, so it cannot claim a win in any measured category. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU also wins on power efficiency, with a 28 W TDP compared to 225 W, and it requires no external power connectors.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins on raw specification counts. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is roughly 4.4 times higher than the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU's 5.530 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is roughly 8.9 times higher. Memory bandwidth favors the Lisuan part at 432.0 GB/s versus 128.0 GB/s, and its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s exceeds 129.6 GPixel/s. The texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s doubles the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU's 172.8 GTexel/s.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 also wins on shading resources, with 6144 shading units versus 1024, 192 TMUs versus 64, and 96 ROPs versus 48. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides a wider memory path than the 128-bit LPDDR5X configuration of the AMD part. The Lisuan part offers four DisplayPort outputs versus a single USB Type-C, making it more suited for multi-display setups.

The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU wins on process node efficiency, using a 4 nm process versus the Lisuan part's 6 nm process. It also has a smaller die at 233 mm² versus an unknown size for the Lisuan part. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU supports a newer Vulkan version, 1.4 versus 1.3. For use cases requiring verified low-power operation, the AMD part is the only option with confirmed data. For use cases requiring maximum theoretical compute throughput, memory bandwidth, or display connectivity, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 presents the stronger specifications, though its actual performance remains unmeasured.