AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU versus the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. Neither product has any submitted benchmark scores, and both sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database with an average benchmark score of zero. The wins tally is zero for each side. This means the comparison must rely entirely on the architectural and performance specifications recorded for each unit.

The raw compute figures show a substantial gap. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU reaches 8.294 TFLOPS. That places the LX 7G100 at roughly three times the FP32 throughput of the Z1 Extreme. In FP16, the LX 7G100 records 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1), against 16.59 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Z1 Extreme, preserving the same ratio. The texture rate tells a similar story: the LX 7G100 reaches 384.0 GTexel/s, versus 129.6 GTexel/s for the AMD part. Pixel rate also favors the Lisuan unit, 192.0 GPixel/s compared to 86.40 GPixel/s.

Memory bandwidth is another decisive split. The LX 7G100 uses a 192 bit bus with GDDR6 memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding 432.0 GB/s. The Z1 Extreme uses a 64 bit bus with LPDDR5 at 800 MHz (6.4 Gbps effective), producing 51.20 GB/s. That is an 8.4 times bandwidth advantage for the LX 7G100. The memory capacity differs as well, 12 GB on the Lisuan card versus 16 GB on the AMD chip, so the Z1 Extreme holds a capacity lead even as it trails heavily in bandwidth.

The shading resources are not comparable in raw count. The LX 7G100 contains 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The Z1 Extreme contains 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The Lisuan card also carries 12 ray tracing cores on the AMD side, while the LX 7G100 has no recorded ray tracing core count. The Z1 Extreme has a distinct feature in that regard, though the database does not provide any ray tracing benchmark results to quantify the impact.

Clock speeds are only partially recorded. The Z1 Extreme has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2700 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock figures in the database. The memory clock is the only clock value listed for the Lisuan card, 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Without boost clocks for the LX 7G100, the frequency comparison cannot be completed directly, but the compute rates already encode the clock and unit count effects.

Where Each One Wins

The LX 7G100 wins decisively in raw throughput categories. FP32 compute, FP16 compute, texture fill rate, pixel fill rate, and memory bandwidth all favor the Lisuan card by wide margins. These are the metrics that scale with shading units, TMUs, ROPs, and bus width. The 6144 shading units and 192 TMUs give it a structural advantage in any workload that is shader-bound or texture-bound. The 432.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and large buffer transfers, which matters for 4K rendering or compute tasks that stream data heavily.

The Z1 Extreme wins in memory capacity, with 16 GB against 12 GB. It also holds the ray tracing core count advantage, 12 RT cores versus no recorded RT cores on the LX 7G100. The AMD chip is built on a smaller process node, 4 nm versus 6 nm, and it operates at a dramatically lower TDP, 30 W against 225 W. The power envelope difference is substantial, though the database does not include efficiency benchmarks to translate that into a performance-per-watt score. The Z1 Extreme also uses a single USB Type-C display output, while the LX 7G100 provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, which matters for multi-monitor setups.

The architecture split is clear. The LX 7G100 is a desktop-oriented card with a dual-slot cooler, a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, an 8-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W PSU. The Z1 Extreme is a compact 280 mm (11 inches) long, 111 mm (4.4 inches) high, 21 mm (0.8 inches) wide unit with no power connectors and no bus interface listed. The Z1 Extreme is built for constrained spaces and low power draw, while the LX 7G100 is built for maximum throughput in a standard desktop chassis. Those are different design targets, and the benchmark data reflects that in the specification sheet.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU uses the Phoenix chip and RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The transistor count is 25,390 million on a 178 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 142.6M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip and a "TrueGPU" architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The transistor count and die size are not recorded for the Lisuan part, so a density comparison is not possible.

The memory subsystems are fundamentally different. The Z1 Extreme uses LPDDR5 on a 64 bit bus, which explains its low 51.20 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 uses GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus, reaching 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock for the AMD part is listed as 800 MHz (6.4 Gbps effective), while the Lisuan part runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The AMD chip has more total memory, 16 GB versus 12 GB, but the Lisuan card has nearly 8.4 times the bandwidth.

The compute architecture differs in scale. The Z1 Extreme has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. That is exactly 8 times the shading units, 4 times the TMUs, and 3 times the ROPs. The FP32 ratio is not identical to the shading unit ratio because clock speeds differ: the Z1 Extreme boosts to 2700 MHz, while the LX 7G100 has no recorded boost clock. The ray tracing hardware is present on the AMD chip with 12 RT cores, and absent from the Lisuan specification sheet. The Z1 Extreme supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The power and physical designs diverge sharply. The Z1 Extreme is rated at 30 W TDP, has no power connectors, and uses a single USB Type-C display output. The LX 7G100 is rated at 225 W TDP, uses a dual-slot cooler, requires one 8-pin power connector, and is suggested for a 550 W power supply. The Lisuan card is 294 mm (11.6 inches) long, 120 mm (4.7 inches) high, and 49 mm (1.9 inches) wide. The AMD chip is 280 mm (11 inches) long, 111 mm (4.4 inches) high, and 21 mm (0.8 inches) wide. The LX 7G100 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the Z1 Extreme has no bus interface recorded. The release dates differ as well: the Z1 Extreme launched on 2023-06-12, and the LX 7G100 on 2026-06-17. The Z1 Extreme had a launch MSRP of 699 USD, while the LX 7G100 has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The data shows two products aimed at different roles. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 dominates every raw throughput metric recorded in the database. Its FP32 performance is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 8.294 TFLOPS for the Z1 Extreme. Its memory bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s versus 51.20 GB/s. Its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 129.6 GTexel/s. For any workload that depends on shader throughput, texture filtering, or memory bandwidth, the LX 7G100 is the clear choice based on the recorded specifications.

The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU wins on capacity and efficiency metrics. It holds 16 GB of memory versus 12 GB, which matters for workloads that need large working sets rather than fast streaming. It is the only one of the two with ray tracing cores recorded, 12 RT cores. It draws 30 W against 225 W, making it suitable for systems where power delivery and heat dissipation are constrained. Its physical footprint is smaller in height and width, and it requires no auxiliary power connector.

The benchmarks section of the database is empty for both products, and neither has any nearest rivals listed. The percentile ranking is identical at 50 for both, which reflects the absence of measured scores rather than any performance equivalence. The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: pick the LX 7G100 for maximum compute and bandwidth, and pick the Z1 Extreme for low power, ray tracing support, and larger memory capacity. The 699 USD launch MSRP for the Z1 Extreme is the only price data available; the LX 7G100 has none recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, while the AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU delivers 8.294 TFLOPS.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU has 16 GB of LPDDR5, and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The LX 7G100 reaches 432.0 GB/s over a 192 bit bus, while the Z1 Extreme reaches 51.20 GB/s over a 64 bit bus.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both are listed with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support. They also both support OpenGL 4.6, but the Z1 Extreme supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing cores?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU has a recorded ray tracing core count, with 12 RT cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no ray tracing cores listed.

Q: What are the power requirements for each?

A: The Z1 Extreme is rated at 30 W TDP with no power connectors. The LX 7G100 is rated at 225 W TDP, uses one 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested power supply of 550 W.