AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO represent two distinct approaches to GPU design. The RX 9070 XT comes from AMD’s Radeon RX 9000 series, built on the Navi 48 chip with RDNA 4.0 architecture. The LX PRO, manufactured by an unknown company, uses the 7G105 chip with a TrueGPU architecture. The database contains a full benchmark profile for the RX 9070 XT, while the LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores. This analysis separates the two based on the available data, focusing on where each card has clear advantages.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT wins in every recorded performance metric because it is the only one of the two with benchmark results in the database. The LX PRO has an empty benchmark array, meaning no direct performance measurements exist for it. The RX 9070 XT delivers 7260 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 17428 in Geekbench OpenCL, 65879 in Geekbench Vulkan, and 26795 in Passmark G3D. It also posts 15864 in Passmark GPU Compute. These figures give it an average benchmark score of 13543 and a percentile rank of 55 against all GPUs.

The LX PRO, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50. The percentile of 50 is the default midpoint, not a measured result. With no scores in the database, the LX PRO cannot claim any benchmark win. The RX 9070 XT also leads in raw compute output, with 48.66 TFLOPS FP32 versus 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO. The RX 9070 XT has a texture rate of 760.3 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 380.2 GPixel/s. The LX PRO produces 384.0 GTexel/s and 192.0 GPixel/s. In every measurable compute category, the RX 9070 XT is ahead.

The LX PRO does win in memory capacity and power efficiency. It offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, compared to 16 GB on a 256 bit bus for the RX 9070 XT. The RX 9070 XT has the higher memory bandwidth at 644.6 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. The LX PRO also has a lower TDP at 225 W, while the RX 9070 XT draws 304 W. The suggested PSU for the LX PRO is 550 W, and for the RX 9070 XT it is 700 W. The LX PRO uses a single 16 pin power connector, while the RX 9070 XT uses two 8 pin connectors. These are the areas where the LX PRO shows its advantages.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The LX PRO has an empty benchmark list, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals. The RX 9070 XT has ten recorded benchmark scores.

Q: How much faster is the RX 9070 XT in FP32 compute?

A: The RX 9070 XT delivers 48.66 TFLOPS FP32, while the LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The RX 9070 XT is approximately double the FP32 throughput.

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. The RX 9070 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The LX PRO has 8 GB more capacity.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 9070 XT has 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth over a 256 bit bus. The LX PRO has 432.0 GB/s over a 192 bit bus. The RX 9070 XT provides roughly 49% more bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RX 9070 XT has a TDP of 304 W and a suggested PSU of 700 W. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The LX PRO requires less power.

Q: Which card has a higher percentile rank?

A: The RX 9070 XT sits at the 55th percentile among all GPUs. The LX PRO sits at the 50th percentile, which reflects its unmeasured status rather than a tested result.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no direct head-to-head benchmark entries in the database for these two cards. The comparison must rely on the standalone scores of the RX 9070 XT and the architectural specs of the LX PRO. The RX 9070 XT scores 7260 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. That is its strongest synthetic gaming result. In Geekbench Vulkan, it reaches 65879, which indicates strong low level API performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 17428 is lower but still substantial. Passmark G3D gives 26795, and Passmark GPU Compute gives 15864. The average of all ten benchmarks is 13543.

The nearest rivals for the RX 9070 XT in the database are all older or lower tier cards. The AMD Radeon HD 7770M has an average score of 13536, a delta of 0.1%. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 scores 13515, a delta of 0.2%. The NVIDIA P106-090 scores 13470, a delta of 0.5%. The AMD Radeon Pro 555 scores 13407, a delta of 1%. These deltas are small, meaning the RX 9070 XT is only marginally ahead of these cards in average benchmark score. This is surprising given the modern architecture, but the data shows the average is pulled down by low Passmark DX scores. The RX 9070 XT scores only 78 in Passmark DirectX 12, 154 in DirectX 10, 292 in DirectX 11, and 353 in DirectX 9. The Passmark G2D score is 1328. These low legacy scores drag the average down.

The LX PRO has no scores to compare directly. Its FP16 output is 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RX 9070 XT has 48.66 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO has a slight edge in FP16 peak throughput. In FP32, the RX 9070 XT is roughly double. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units versus 4096 for the RX 9070 XT, but the RX 9070 XT has 256 texture mapping units versus 192, and 128 ROPs versus 96. The higher shading unit count in the LX PRO does not translate to higher FP32 due to the lower clock rates. The RX 9070 XT boosts to 2970 MHz, while the LX PRO has no base or boost clock listed. The memory clock for the LX PRO is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the RX 9070 XT runs memory at 2518 MHz with 20.1 Gbps effective.

The recorded data indicates that the RX 9070 XT is the faster card in all measured workloads. The LX PRO remains an unknown in direct execution tests. The only verifiable performance advantages for the LX PRO are its larger memory pool and lower power draw.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every core specification. The RX 9070 XT uses a 4 nm process node at TSMC, while the LX PRO uses a 6 nm node at the same foundry. The RX 9070 XT has 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, giving a density of 151.0M per mm². The LX PRO has unknown transistor count and die size. The RX 9070 XT has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RX 9070 XT includes 64 ray tracing cores; the LX PRO has no ray tracing core count listed.

Memory differs substantially. The RX 9070 XT has 16 GB GDDR6 on a 256 bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 9070 XT has a base clock of 1660 MHz, a boost of 2970 MHz, and a game clock of 2400 MHz. The LX PRO lists no base, boost, or game clock. Memory clocks are 2518 MHz for the RX 9070 XT and 2250 MHz for the LX PRO.

Power and connectivity differ as well. The RX 9070 XT has a TDP of 304 W, a suggested PSU of 700 W, and two 8 pin power connectors. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, a suggested PSU of 550 W, and one 16 pin connector. The RX 9070 XT uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are also different: the RX 9070 XT has one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a outputs. The LX PRO has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Both are dual slot cards. The LX PRO has listed dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. The RX 9070 XT has no dimensions listed.

API support is mostly similar. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 9070 XT supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The RX 9070 XT has a release date of March 5, 2025, and a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The LX PRO has a release date of March 16, 2026, and no launch MSRP. The RX 9070 XT lists a predecessor of Navi III. The LX PRO has no predecessor or successor listed.

Architecture Differences

The RX 9070 XT uses RDNA 4.0 architecture on the Navi 48 chip. It belongs to the Navi IV generation, also called the RX 9000 series. The LX PRO uses TrueGPU architecture on the 7G105 chip, belonging to the 7G100 generation. These are entirely different design families. RDNA 4.0 is a modern GPU architecture from AMD designed for gaming and compute. TrueGPU appears to be a proprietary design from Lisuan Tech, with no direct lineage in the database.

The RX 9070 XT is built on a 4 nm TSMC process, which is more advanced than the 6 nm process used for the LX PRO. The smaller process node allows the RX 9070 XT to pack 53,900 million transistors into 357 mm². The LX PRO has no transistor or die size data. The RX 9070 XT has dedicated ray tracing cores, with 64 of them. The LX PRO has no ray tracing core count, suggesting it may lack dedicated RT hardware. The RX 9070 XT also has a 1:1 FP16 ratio, meaning its FP16 throughput matches its FP32 throughput at 48.66 TFLOPS. The LX PRO uses a 2:1 FP16 ratio, delivering 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 while its FP32 is only 24.58 TFLOPS.

The RX 9070 XT supports Vulkan 1.4, a newer API version than the 1.3 supported by the LX PRO. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 9070 XT uses PCIe 5.0, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0. The RX 9070 XT has a game clock of 2400 MHz, a feature not present on the LX PRO. The LX PRO has a larger memory capacity at 24 GB, which suggests it may be targeted at workloads that require large datasets, such as machine learning inference or content creation. However, the database does not include any benchmark results to confirm this.

The RX 9070 XT was released on March 5, 2025. The LX PRO was released on March 16, 2026. The RX 9070 XT has a listed predecessor in Navi III. The LX PRO has no predecessor. The RX 9070 XT is produced by AMD, while the LX PRO has an unknown manufacturer. The LX PRO does have a longer physical footprint with its listed dimensions. The RX 9070 XT does not have dimensions in the database.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is the faster card in every measured category. It has an average benchmark score of 13543, a 55th percentile ranking, and ten individual scores across DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan, and Passmark tests. Its FP32 performance of 48.66 TFLOPS is double the LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 760.3 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 380.2 GPixel/s far exceed the LX PRO's 384.0 GTexel/s and 192.0 GPixel/s. Its memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s is higher, and its boost clock reaches 2970 MHz. Any user prioritizing raw rendering performance should choose the RX 9070 XT based on the recorded numbers.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark scores in the database, so its actual performance cannot be verified. Its advantages are structural: 24 GB of memory versus 16 GB, a lower TDP of 225 W versus 304 W, a lower suggested PSU of 550 W versus 700 W, and a single 16 pin power connector versus two 8 pin connectors. It also has 6144 shading units, which is 2048 more than the RX 9070 XT. The LX PRO is a larger card physically, at 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is slightly higher than the RX 9070 XT's 48.66 TFLOPS. For workloads that depend on FP16 or on memory capacity beyond 16 GB, the LX PRO may have an edge, but the database contains no direct measurements to confirm it.

The RX 9070 XT sits at the 55th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon HD 7770M and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570, are within 1% of its average score. This indicates that the RX 9070 XT's average is heavily influenced by its low legacy DirectX scores. Its modern workloads, such as 3DMark Steel Nomad at 7260 and Geekbench Vulkan at 65879, are strong. The LX PRO has a 50th percentile rank, but that is a placeholder value due to the absence of tests.

The final choice depends on which metric matters. For gaming, rendering, and general compute, the RX 9070 XT is the only card with verified performance. For memory capacity and power efficiency, the LX PRO offers 24 GB and a 225 W TDP. The RX 9070 XT also has a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The LX PRO has no launch MSRP. The RX 9070 XT is the safer pick for anyone who needs measurable performance. The LX PRO remains an unverified option with a larger memory buffer and lower power draw.