AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded performance data for the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is limited to two benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO currently has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This makes a direct side-by-side comparison of measured performance impossible. However, the available data for the RX 9070 GRE can be analyzed against its nearest rivals to establish a performance baseline, and the LX PRO's architectural specifications can be assessed against that baseline.

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE achieves an average benchmark score of 57,367 across all recorded tests. Its percentile ranking places it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs in the database, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of tracked graphics cards. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RX 9070 GRE scores 5,424 points. Its OpenCL performance in Geekbench reaches 109,309 points. These two results contribute to the card's overall average, though the specific weighting of each test in the average is not detailed in the database.

The nearest rivals for the RX 9070 GRE provide context for its performance level. The Intel Arc A580 has an average score of 57,756, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 9070 GRE. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085, a 1.2% advantage. The Intel Arc A570M averages 58,239, outperforming the RX 9070 GRE by 1.5%. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT leads this group with an average score of 58,392, which is 1.8% higher than the RX 9070 GRE. These deltas are relatively small, placing the RX 9070 GRE in a tight performance cluster where the difference between the lowest and highest scores in its nearest rival group is less than 2%.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50, indicating that no benchmark results have been recorded for it. The database shows no nearest rivals for the LX PRO, and no wins are recorded for either card in head-to-head testing. The LX PRO's performance position cannot be established from direct measurements. Its specifications suggest a different performance profile, but without recorded scores, any comparison remains inferential.

The data shows that the RX 9070 GRE sits slightly below its closest competitors in average score, but the margins are narrow. A 0.7% deficit to the Intel Arc A580 and a 1.8% deficit to the RX 6950 XT are within the range of normal run-to-run variation for many benchmarks. The RX 9070 GRE's 87th percentile ranking confirms that it is a high-performing card relative to the full database, even if it trails its immediate rivals by small margins.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has an average benchmark score of 57,367 across all recorded tests. This places it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: How does the RX 9070 GRE compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A580?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has an average score of 57,756, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 9070 GRE. This is the smallest delta among the RX 9070 GRE's nearest rivals.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The LX PRO has no benchmark results in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile ranking is 50, which reflects an absence of measured data rather than a specific performance level.

Q: What are the memory specifications for both cards?

A: Both cards use GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus width and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB of memory, while the LX PRO has 24 GB. Both run memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: How do the pixel and texture rates compare between the two cards?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has a pixel rate of 267.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 535.7 GTexel/s. The LX PRO has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The RX 9070 GRE is higher in both metrics.

Q: What is the TDP for each card?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has a TDP of 220 W. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W. Both cards have a suggested PSU rating of 550 W.

The Verdict

The data indicates two very different products. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has recorded benchmark scores, placing it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Its average score of 57,367 is competitive with its nearest rivals, trailing the Intel Arc A580 by 0.7%, the RX 5600 OEM by 1.2%, the Arc A570M by 1.5%, and the RX 6950 XT by 1.8%. These are small margins, and the card's percentile ranking confirms it is a strong performer in the broader database.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores. Its percentile ranking of 50 and average score of 0 reflect the absence of data, not a measured performance level. The LX PRO's specifications do show some advantages on paper. It has 24 GB of memory versus the RX 9070 GRE's 12 GB, and it has 6,144 shading units versus 3,072. Its FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS, which is higher than its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS, indicating a 2:1 ratio. The RX 9070 GRE has a 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio at 34.28 TFLOPS for both.

For users who rely on measured performance, the RX 9070 GRE is the only card with data to support a decision. Its benchmark results place it in the upper tier of the database, and its nearest rivals are all within a narrow 1.8% band. The LX PRO cannot be evaluated on performance grounds because no scores exist. Its larger memory capacity and higher shading unit count are notable specifications, but the database provides no evidence of how these translate into actual benchmark results. The choice between these two cards, from the available data, is straightforward: the RX 9070 GRE has demonstrable performance, while the LX PRO remains unmeasured.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in several key specifications. Memory size is the most obvious difference: the RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB of GDDR6, while the LX PRO has 24 GB. Both use a 192-bit bus and achieve 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 9070 GRE has 3,072 shading units, while the LX PRO has 6,144. Texture mapping units and ROPs are identical at 192 and 96, respectively. The RX 9070 GRE has 48 ray tracing cores; the LX PRO lists no RT core count.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The RX 9070 GRE has a base clock of 1420 MHz, a boost clock of 2790 MHz, and a game clock of 2220 MHz. The LX PRO has no base, boost, or game clocks recorded in the database. Memory clocks are the same for both: 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Compute rates diverge. The RX 9070 GRE delivers 34.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.28 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 267.8 GPixel/s for the RX 9070 GRE and 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO. Texture rate is 535.7 GTexel/s for the RX 9070 GRE and 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX PRO.

Power and connectivity also differ. The RX 9070 GRE has a TDP of 220 W and uses 2x 8-pin power connectors. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 16-pin connector. Both have a suggested PSU of 550 W and are dual-slot cards. The RX 9070 GRE uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a for the RX 9070 GRE, versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for the LX PRO. The LX PRO has recorded dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width; the RX 9070 GRE has no dimensions listed. The RX 9070 GRE has a launch MSRP of 549 USD.

Architecture Differences

The architectural foundations of the two cards are distinct. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is built on the Navi 48 chip using RDNA 4.0 architecture, part of the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. It uses a 4 nm process at TSMC with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. It uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown in the database.

The RX 9070 GRE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The RX 9070 GRE has 48 RT cores, while the LX PRO has no RT core count specified. The RX 9070 GRE's FP16 performance matches its FP32 at 34.28 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO's FP16 performance is double its FP32 at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, indicating a 2:1 ratio. This suggests the LX PRO is designed for workloads that benefit from packed math, while the RX 9070 GRE maintains symmetric throughput across both precisions.

The memory architecture is identical in bus width and bandwidth, but the LX PRO doubles the capacity to 24 GB. The process node difference, 4 nm versus 6 nm, is notable, though the LX PRO's transistor count is not recorded, so density comparisons are impossible. The RX 9070 GRE's PCIe 5.0 interface provides twice the bandwidth of the LX PRO's PCIe 4.0 interface, though the practical impact depends on workload and system configuration. The display output capabilities also differ: the RX 9070 GRE supports HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1a, while the LX PRO only supports DisplayPort 1.4a across four ports.

The production status for both cards is listed as Active. The RX 9070 GRE was released on 2025-05-07, and the LX PRO on 2026-03-16. The RX 9070 GRE has a predecessor listed as Navi III, while the LX PRO has no predecessor recorded. The RX 9070 GRE has a launch MSRP of 549 USD, while the LX PRO has no MSRP recorded.