AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile Comparison

The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE represent two very different design philosophies aimed at distinct segments of the GPU market. The A4500 Mobile is built on NVIDIA’s Ampere architecture, using the GA104 chip fabricated on Samsung’s 8 nm process. This is a professional mobile workstation part, designed for sustained compute and rendering tasks in a laptop chassis, as indicated by its 140 W TDP and lack of dedicated power connectors, relying on the portable device’s own power delivery system. In contrast, the RX 9070 GRE is a desktop consumer card from AMD’s RDNA 4.0 architecture, using the Navi 48 chip on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It is a dual-slot, actively cooled card with two 8-pin power connectors and a 220 W TDP, reflecting its focus on raw performance over power efficiency.

The manufacturing differences are stark. The A4500 Mobile packs 17,400 million transistors into a 392 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 44.4 million per square millimeter. The RX 9070 GRE, by comparison, integrates 53,900 million transistors into a slightly smaller 357 mm² die, achieving a much higher density of 151.0 million per square millimeter. This density advantage, combined with a 4 nm process versus 8 nm, allows the AMD part to clock significantly higher. The RX 9070 GRE has a base clock of 1420 MHz, a game clock of 2220 MHz, and a boost clock of 2790 MHz. The A4500 Mobile operates at a much lower 930 MHz base and 1500 MHz boost, typical for a mobile part constrained by thermal and power limits.

Memory configurations also diverge. The NVIDIA card offers 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD card provides 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, resulting in 432.0 GB/s. While the A4500 Mobile has more memory and bandwidth, the RX 9070 GRE compensates with higher absolute compute throughput. The AMD part features 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, alongside 48 ray accelerators. The NVIDIA part has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. Despite having fewer shading units, the RX 9070 GRE’s higher clocks push its FP32 performance to 34.28 TFLOPS, nearly double the A4500 Mobile’s 17.66 TFLOPS. The pixel rate for the AMD card is 267.8 GPixel/s versus 144.0 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA, and the texture rate is 535.7 GTexel/s versus 276.0 GTexel/s.

The feature sets are similar in terms of API support, with both cards supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. However, the RX 9070 GRE uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the A4500 Mobile is limited to PCIe 4.0 x16. The AMD card also offers specific display outputs: one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a connectors, whereas the mobile NVIDIA part’s outputs are dependent on the host laptop. The production statuses reflect their market positions: the A4500 Mobile is end-of-life, released in March 2022, while the RX 9070 GRE is an active product launched in May 2025.

The Verdict

The benchmark data in the database paints a clear, albeit narrow, picture. In the only head-to-head test recorded, Geekbench OpenCL, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 109,309 against the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile’s 105,307. This gives the AMD card a 3.7% lead in that specific workload. This is the sole benchmark win recorded between the two, with the AMD part claiming it decisively.

However, the broader context from the database’s average benchmark scores is crucial. The A4500 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 91,134, which places it in the 93rd percentile of all GPUs. The RX 9070 GRE, despite its higher peak performance in OpenCL, has a much lower average score of 57,367, placing it in only the 87th percentile. This discrepancy suggests that the AMD card’s performance is less consistent across a wide range of tests, whereas the NVIDIA card delivers a more uniformly high level of performance across the board.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each card highlights their different competitive landscapes. The A4500 Mobile’s average score is just 0.6% below the desktop NVIDIA RTX A4500, and it is 4.2% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 and 4.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W7600. This places it firmly in professional workstation territory, where stability and consistent performance are paramount. The RX 9070 GRE, on the other hand, sits within 1.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, and is only marginally ahead of or behind mid-range Intel Arc parts. Its average score is 0.7% below the Intel Arc A580, 1.2% below the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, and 1.5% below the Intel Arc A570M.

For users seeking a professional mobile solution with a proven track record, high memory capacity, and consistent performance, the RTX A4500 Mobile is the clear choice based on the data. For users prioritizing raw compute in a specific API like OpenCL, the RX 9070 GRE offers a slight edge, but its lower average score and consumer-oriented design make it less suitable for sustained professional workloads. The data indicates the A4500 Mobile is the more reliable performer overall, despite being older and technically end-of-life.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison in the database is the Geekbench OpenCL test. Here, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE posted a score of 109,309, while the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile scored 105,307. The delta percentage is reported as -3.7%, meaning the NVIDIA card is 3.7% slower than the AMD card in this test. This is a significant win for the RX 9070 GRE, showcasing its higher FP32 compute throughput, which is nearly double that of the A4500 Mobile.

This result aligns with the architectural differences. The RX 9070 GRE’s 34.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, combined with its higher boost clock of 2790 MHz, allows it to excel in compute-heavy tasks that scale with raw shader throughput. The A4500 Mobile, with its 17.66 TFLOPS, relies on its larger memory bus and 16 GB frame buffer to maintain competitiveness in memory-bound scenarios, but that advantage does not manifest in this particular OpenCL test.

It is notably the A4500 Mobile’s average benchmark score of 91,134 is substantially higher than the RX 9070 GRE’s 57,367. This suggests that the A4500 Mobile performs significantly better in other, unrecorded benchmark suites, likely those that favor driver optimization, professional rendering, or memory bandwidth. The RX 9070 GRE’s single high score in OpenCL does not translate to overall dominance in the database’s aggregated metrics. The data indicates that while the AMD card wins the specific head-to-head test, the NVIDIA card is the more consistent performer across the full spectrum of recorded benchmarks.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile has a significantly higher average benchmark score of 91,134, compared to the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE’s 57,367.

Q: How do the two cards compare in the Geekbench OpenCL test?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE wins the Geekbench OpenCL test with a score of 109,309, while the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile scores 105,307, giving the AMD card a 3.7% lead.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each card?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor density?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has a transistor density of 151.0 million per square millimeter, while the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile has a density of 44.4 million per square millimeter.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile is listed as end-of-life, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is listed as active.

Q: How does the NVIDIA card compare to its nearest rival, the desktop RTX A4500?

A: The RTX A4500 Mobile’s average score is 0.6% lower than the desktop NVIDIA RTX A4500, indicating near-parity in performance.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE wins in the specific compute benchmark recorded: Geekbench OpenCL. Its 3.7% advantage over the A4500 Mobile in this test is a direct result of its higher FP32 throughput (34.28 TFLOPS versus 17.66 TFLOPS) and faster clock speeds. The RX 9070 GRE is also the only card with a recorded win in the head-to-head comparison, making it the choice for users who prioritize OpenCL compute performance above all else. Its newer architecture, 4 nm process, and higher pixel and texture rates (267.8 GPixel/s and 535.7 GTexel/s respectively) also give it theoretical advantages in rasterization-heavy workloads, though no direct benchmark confirms this.

The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile wins on overall consistency and aggregate performance. Its average benchmark score of 91,134 is far superior to the RX 9070 GRE’s 57,367, and it sits in the 93rd percentile of all GPUs, while the AMD card is in the 87th percentile. The A4500 Mobile’s 16 GB memory capacity and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a larger memory pool for professional applications like large scene rendering or AI inference. Its nearest rivals are all professional or workstation-class cards, and it performs within 0.6% of the desktop RTX A4500, indicating it is a mature, well-optimized product for that market segment.

For mobile workstation users, the A4500 Mobile is the obvious pick due to its laptop form factor, 140 W TDP, and professional pedigree. For desktop users seeking a consumer GPU with a specific edge in OpenCL, the RX 9070 GRE offers that advantage, but its lower average score suggests it may not be as well-rounded. The data ultimately favors the RTX A4500 Mobile for sustained, diverse workloads, while the RX 9070 GRE is the specialist that wins the one test where they are directly compared. The launch MSRP for the RX 9070 GRE is 549 USD, though no comparable figure exists for the mobile NVIDIA part.