AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile Comparison
AMD Radeon RX 7600M
RTX A4500 Mobile
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
Where Each One Wins
The recorded benchmark data splits cleanly between these two mobile GPUs. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile wins the only head-to-head comparison available, taking the Geekbench OpenCL test with a score of 105307 against the AMD Radeon RX 7600M’s 63775. That is a 65.1% advantage, a decisive margin in raw compute throughput. The NVIDIA part also has a Geekbench Vulkan score of 76960, while the AMD side has no recorded Vulkan result, so in any Vulkan workload the data simply shows NVIDIA as the only measured option.
The AMD Radeon RX 7600M does not win any benchmark in the database. However, its positioning tells a different story. It sits at the 89th percentile among all GPUs, while the RTX A4500 Mobile sits at the 93rd percentile. Both are high performers, but the NVIDIA part is further up the overall distribution. The AMD card’s average benchmark score is 63775, placing it in the same performance band as the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (63830, a 0.1% gap) and the NVIDIA CMP 30HX (63842, also a 0.1% gap). The RTX A4500 Mobile’s average of 91134 is much closer to the desktop NVIDIA RTX A4500 (91671, a 0.6% gap) and the AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 (92466, a 1.4% gap).
The use-case split is therefore not about trade-offs between two measured sets of wins. Instead, the database shows a clear hierarchy: the RTX A4500 Mobile is built for compute-heavy tasks where OpenCL throughput matters, and the RX 7600M is a lighter, lower-power option that still lands in the upper tier of GPU performance but with a smaller footprint in the benchmark data.
Architecture Differences
The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile uses the GA104 chip built on Ampere architecture, fabricated by Samsung on an 8 nm process. It packs 17,400 million transistors into a 392 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 44.4 million per square millimeter. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, built by TSMC on a 6 nm process. It contains 13,300 million transistors on a much smaller 204 mm² die, giving a higher density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The AMD part is the more modern process, but the NVIDIA part is the larger and more complex chip.
Core counts differ substantially. The RTX A4500 Mobile has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. It also includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, the latter being absent entirely from the AMD card. The RX 7600M has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 28 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA part has more than three times the shading units and roughly 1.6 times the TMUs and ROPs. The tensor cores on the NVIDIA side enable dedicated AI and deep learning workloads, a feature the AMD card does not offer in this configuration.
Memory architecture is another major divergence. The RTX A4500 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s. That is exactly half the bus width and half the bandwidth, with half the capacity. Both run the memory at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, but the wider bus on the NVIDIA part is what doubles the throughput.
Clock behavior also sets them apart. The RX 7600M has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2410 MHz. The RTX A4500 Mobile has a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost of 1500 MHz, with no game clock listed. The AMD part runs at significantly higher frequencies, but the NVIDIA part compensates with far more execution resources.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The only direct comparison in the database is Geekbench OpenCL. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile scores 105307, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775. The delta is 65.1% in favor of NVIDIA. That is a large enough margin that it would be visible in any compute-oriented application, from rendering to simulation to machine learning inference.
Looking at the NVIDIA card’s Vulkan score of 76960, it is lower than its OpenCL score by roughly 27%, indicating that the card’s compute performance is not fully replicated across all APIs. Still, the absence of a Vulkan score for the AMD part means the database cannot quantify how the two compare in that API.
The average benchmark scores reinforce the OpenCL result. The RTX A4500 Mobile averages 91134 across its two recorded tests, while the RX 7600M averages 63775 from its single test. The NVIDIA part’s average is 42.9% higher than the AMD part’s average, consistent with the 65.1% OpenCL margin when accounting for the Vulkan score pulling the NVIDIA average down.
The percentile ranks tell a similar story. The RTX A4500 Mobile is at the 93rd percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 7600M is at the 89th. Both are strong, but the NVIDIA part sits four percentile points higher, which in a large database represents a meaningful performance tier gap.
Specification Differences
The table below isolates the fields where the two GPUs differ, based solely on the database records.
| Specification | NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| Chip | GA104 | Navi 33 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Codename | None listed | Hotpink Bonefish |
| Generation | Ampere-MW (Ax000) | Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Foundry | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistors | 17,400 million | 13,300 million |
| Die Size | 392 mm² | 204 mm² |
| Transistor Density | 44.4M / mm² | 65.2M / mm² |
| Base Clock | 930 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2410 MHz |
| Game Clock | None listed | 2070 MHz |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 1792 |
| TMUs | 184 | 112 |
| ROPs | 96 | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 28 |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | None |
| Pixel Rate | 144.0 GPixel/s | 154.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture Rate | 276.0 GTexel/s | 269.9 GTexel/s |
| FP32 | 17.66 TFLOPS | 17.27 TFLOPS |
| FP16 | 17.66 TFLOPS (1:1) | 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| TDP | 140 W | 90 W |
| Slot Width | None listed | IGP |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Release Date | 2022-03-21 | 2023-01-03 |
| Predecessor | Quadro Turing-M | Polaris Mobile |
| Successor | Ada-MW | None listed |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 105307 | 63775 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 76960 | Not recorded |
| Average Benchmark Score | 91134 | 63775 |
| Percentile vs All GPUs | 93 | 89 |
The NVIDIA part has a higher FP32 throughput at 17.66 TFLOPS versus 17.27 TFLOPS, a narrow 2.3% edge. The AMD part has a much higher FP16 throughput at 34.55 TFLOPS, double its FP32 rate, while the NVIDIA part runs FP16 at a 1:1 ratio matching its FP32. For workloads that use FP16 arithmetic, the AMD card has a clear advantage on paper.
Pixel rate favors AMD at 154.2 GPixel/s versus 144.0 GPixel/s, a 7.1% margin. Texture rate is nearly identical, with NVIDIA at 276.0 GTexel/s and AMD at 269.9 GTexel/s. The AMD card draws only 90 W, while the NVIDIA part draws 140 W, so the AMD part delivers its performance at a 35.7% lower power envelope.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU is faster in OpenCL compute?
A: The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile scores 105307 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775. That is a 65.1% advantage for NVIDIA.
Q: Does the AMD Radeon RX 7600M have any benchmark win over the RTX A4500 Mobile?
A: No. The database records one head-to-head benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL, and the NVIDIA part wins it. The AMD card has zero wins in the recorded data.
Q: How do their memory subsystems compare?
A: The RTX A4500 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 7600M has 8 GB on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both run at 16 Gbps effective memory speed.
Q: What is the power draw difference?
A: The RTX A4500 Mobile has a TDP of 140 W, while the RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W. The AMD part consumes 35.7% less power.
Q: Which GPU has better FP16 compute capability?
A: The RX 7600M delivers 34.55 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX A4500 Mobile delivers 17.66 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The AMD card has roughly double the FP16 throughput.
Q: How do their overall performance percentiles compare?
A: The RTX A4500 Mobile sits at the 93rd percentile of all GPUs, and the RX 7600M sits at the 89th percentile. The NVIDIA part ranks higher in the overall distribution.